That video is so fucking hilarious, seriously, the single worst live vocalist ever.

too bad the film wont see the light of day till prolly 2011

lol dukes, I was about to say the same thing. wasted money.

Ahh there are so many worse vocalists than him, the cover isn't bad but it is rather pointless.

wait, when you say "worst vocalist" you mean Bob Dylan, right?

^ couldn't agree more! ^

ITT people who know absolutely nothing about human sexuality.

watchman movie was gonna suck anyways, so im glad its not gonna come out for forever.
lol video too

yeah i saw them open for green day just before they hit big. and remember the singer couldn't sing to save himself. thats only live, his fine in the studio.

Please, no.

i wonder how many fan boys and girls thought that this was a new MCR song.

I'm thinking the ones who aren't familiar with Bob Dylan's music, instead preferring a more modern take on angst that is no more and no less than Bob Dylan ever really was.

That dude with the poofy hair in the photo looks like he's wearing lipstick.

above comment makes no sense whatsoever

I mean that Bob Dylan was the cure for angst felt by young people in his time, now MCR is used similarly. Aside from interesting lyrics Bob Dylan isn't on a higher pedestal than MCR and bands like them, they serve(d) the same exact purpose. I just have a problem with people who think their musical taste is superior than others because they dabble with a few bands that Top-40 enthusiasts would have difficulty recognizing. And in all due respect, that comment I made previously actually makes a lot of sense and is very easy to decipher.This Message Edited On 12.29.08

That video is so ****ing hilarious, seriously, the single worst live vocalist ever.

And in all due respect, that comment I made previously actually makes a lot of sense and is very easy to decipher.

I just have a problem with people who think their musical taste is superior than others because they dabble with a few bands that Top-40 enthusiasts would have difficulty recognizing

did anyone else read this as "MCR SHOOT DYLAN"

yeah without Bob Dylan's influence we wouldn't have other "great" musicians like Tom Petty

Oh wow...that was a clearly wasted 3 minutes...

That dude with the poofy hair in the photo looks like he's wearing lipstick.

Benzum, Bob Dylan was a part of a movement that overshadowed the real movement happening underground. The 60's...they were not exactly an era to be proud of outside of our musical accomplishments, his influence has not surfaced in modern times outside of music. I'm not saying hes a bad musician, because that wouldn't make any sense. I'm saying that his purpose in the eyes of the listeners isn't any different than MCR's.

What I just wrote makes perfect sense. A phase for impressionable young teenagers? What the fuck was the 60's? The same exact thing, if you can't see that your ignorant to the time-line of human behavior towards musical artists. You should know that you come off as an elitist who will be condescending towards anything young people listen to that is played on MTV and FUSE. Its not healthy to be that way, you have far too much hate in you to accurately judge anything.

Yeah that was bad.

Your not telling anybody anything truthful, your just spouting generic hatred towards a band that doesn't deserve it. If they were killing babies, raping women, and burning housing projects to the ground, then yes, hatred is the right emotion. They covered a Classic Rock song, who the fuck cares, move the fuck on, stop being an elitist (and I know you know that you are one, do not deny). Future generations will not benefit from your mindless hatred of a band you probably haven't even delved that deep into anyway. MCR serves their purpose as a mainstream rock group, Bob Dylan served his purpose as a mainstream folk solo artist.

There is no one more calm than I, and you can't come out of this looking like the successor just by copping out like that, ish don't work no more. There is no reason to tone down anything I'm saying if somebody else's view is so horribly misguided, otherwise I have left the world that much worse of a place.This Message Edited On 12.31.08

Your opinion is one that downplays the credibility of one thing while defending another without offering any substantial evidence, therefore your opinion is invalid. On a cultural scale, Bob Dylan is more famous yes, but he is not more special, not 'better', not any more effective and certainly not the better man; he has recently expressed flimsy negative opinions on modern music such as you are doing right now.

See your not looking deep enough. Just take some advice and do some research before you make comments like 'that statement makes no sense whatsoever' when in reality it actually does. Learn a couple things, embrace new world-views, don't be an elitist and use periods.

That was a bit of an exaggerated statement I'll admit but what I'm really getting at is don't judge things so quickly and don't judge differing opinions so quickly. Take in everything everybody has to say, think about it for a while and then come back with your opinion. You consistently claimed my statements didn't make any sense at all when they really did, they probably just weren't what you wanted to hear about Bob Dylan.

Then you should have said 'this is not what I want to hear about Bob Dylan', why did you feel the need to mislead me? But it seems the thickness has yet to un-bloat anyway.

Thats not what I'm saying, I'm saying think for yourself. You don't have to agree with me at all, you just have to respectfully disagree for a reason.

I dunno, maybe (and this is just a shot in the dark) MCR wanted to cover Bob Dylan because they thought it would be a good or interesting song to cover.