Oh, hell yeah.
|
| |
Yeah, oh hell.
|
| |
Never thought I'd see the day where these guys made a comeback. Songs are good, and its refreshing to hear their sound again. However, they're nothing close to Hold Your Colour
|
| |
Hell, yeah oh.
|
| |
I just discovered that Devin Townsend remix'd Crush 2 years ago. :=O
|
| |
they're decent I guess, but their sound is permanently stuck in the mid-late 00s mentally for me and it's hard to really see these as anything but a sum of nostalgic parts
|
| |
Hell, oh yeah.
|
| |
Hmm I dunno yet. Driver in particular is very generic sounding. Nothing for Free at least doesn't sound like an Immersion B side, that one was pretty cool.
|
| |
everything Sint said
|
| |
Haven't heard them yet but I fear what Sint said, I think there's a very high chance I'll feel the same about these two, that is if they didn't shake up their sound incredibly (and there's no way they did!).
|
| |
i just want an absolute banger like Crush or Watercolour, i dont care about the instrumental d'n'b nonsense.
Just 1 banger pls
|
| |
Watercolour yassss
Tarantula was a hit jam in high school
|
| |
''i just want an absolute banger like Crush or Watercolour, i dont care about the instrumental d'n'b nonsense.'' YEEEESSSSSSSSSS!!!!!
Exactly this.
|
| |
Hmmm, those two (especially Driver) are not yet dispelling my apprehension.
|
| |
Watercolour blows + most of the best Pendulum songs have one foot over and one outside of the pop threshold
|
| |
''Watercolour blows + most of the best Pendulum songs have one foot over and one outside of the pop threshold''
First part NO second part yes they do.
|
| |
First part NO second part yes they do. [2]
|
| |
i just want an absolute banger like Crush or Watercolour, i dont care about the instrumental d'n'b nonsense. [3]
and no pop nonsense like Nothing for Free either. Man these two singles are nothing :/
|
| |
Still waiting for them to go full-on Self vs. Self for an entire album.
|
| |
yea these are very mediocre especially driver
|
| |
Wow so they didn't end up upgrading their sound at all
This shit sounds like it's from 2011
|
| |
Driver is very unnecessary. Very.
|
| |
Sweet nostalgia
|
| |
these both rule tbh
|
| |
What’s so wrong with sticking to the roots and progressing? Old school sounds rule
|
| |
Very true. But I've never really been a fan of their heavier moments à la Slam.
|
| |
trif trif trif
|
| |
Hi budgie hello!
|
| |
"What’s so wrong with sticking to the roots and progressing? Old school sounds rule"
Agreed, they are not pushing boundaries like Radiohead. They make fun, dumb, loud music. If fans want 'progression' they should satisfy themselves with the Knife party dumbster fire.
|
| |
the problem is when you stick to your roots you have to make it good or at least satisfying, especially after teasing it for so long, and neither of these tracks would make the cut on any of their previous albums
|
| |
I don't necessarily disagree with your general point here, but I think these tracks might have been jammed into Immersion. I'm not expecting this album to be much better than a 3/5 but it could be enjoyable for a few listens - its the equivalent of a Hollywood franchise reboot.
|
| |
''its the equivalent of a Hollywood franchise reboot'' Accurate!
''I think these tracks might have been jammed into Immersion'' perhaps they could have been b-sides, but I don't really see them fit on the actual album. They would stand out as very bland compared to the more obvious catchiness of the Immersion tracks.
|
| |
they're a good choice to comeback with. two songs that represent the two most visible sides of Pendulum's sound in an accessible way that might appeal to new audiences as well. I have no doubt they've got weirder shit in the pipeline but these are the smart choice for first
|
| |
maybe, if they at least have a couple real bangers in the works i'll be happy
need another propane nightmares in my life
|
| |
like butane nightmares amirite?
|
| |
How the hell did I miss this? Man... what a nostalgia trip.
|
| |