June of 06, huh. It better be an improvement.

Ah, I don't see how they can make a good album in less than a year.

I sure hope they get better with this. I wasn't a fan of Out of Exile.

There were a few songs on Out of Exile that were great. Perhaps if they waited longer, they could use the cut axe on the rest.

The first album was fantastic. I hated Out of Exile.
Since they said they are going into a different sound... I hope the sound goes in the right direction.

out of exile wasnt good. Though, i cant believe you guys arent supporting the fcat that there maing loads of albums, most bands are lazy goits, they release maybe every three years, i mean i would prefer two a year that werent great than one good one every three years. Also this measn there touring, so hopefuly they may play the festivals and tour in general, which is good.

Why would you want two bad CDs as opposed to one good one in the same time span? Are you really going to buy two crappy CDs that were churned out in a few months? I wouldn't. I'd go for the one with more time and effort put into it. But that's just me...

You guys are all retarded "I wan't an album with more effort and time put into it." Did you know that an album that took 5 years, could have just as much effort as one that came out in 1 year.

And is everyone oblivious to the 50's, 60's, and 70's when bands actaully made one or more cd's in a year. But I guess all those band's sucked. I mean look at the beatles, Sgt. Pepper, Magical Mystery Tour, and the White Album all came out within 2 years, and those are totally the worst albums they ever made *rolls eyes*

Same goes for the Stones! And Elvis, and Bob Dylan. So stop trying to say Audioslave aren't putting any effort into their music, if anything there the only band who's not being lazy, and actually "making" music like their supposed to.