Mumford & Sons post new song

2011-07-06 by Fortheloveofmusic | 107 Comments
English folk act Mumford & Sons have premiered a new song entitled 'Home' on radio station KBCO.

http://soundcloud.com/twentyfourbit/mumford-sons-home-untitled

Tagged: Mumford and Sons

Comments:Add a Comment 
pmmets07
July 6th 2011
5984 Comments


fuck this band

AliW1993
July 6th 2011
7511 Comments


There's something about Mumford And Sons that makes my skin crawl. I fucking despise them.

Waior
July 6th 2011
11778 Comments


yesss it's another mumford song that is fantastic out of context

but within whatever album it'll inevitably be from, it'll sound like every other one

whoops

AliW1993
July 6th 2011
7511 Comments


Like listening to wallpaper.

Although there's a new Frightened Rabbit song on the sidebar so clicking on the link wasn't a total waste of time :D

Eko
July 6th 2011
2118 Comments


the masses finally like an indie band and this is what they choose smh

conradtao
Emeritus
July 6th 2011
2090 Comments


"Like listening to wallpaper."

Perfect description

NateT
July 6th 2011
185 Comments


so good, stoked for their next album

mothercountry
July 6th 2011
447 Comments


the world didn't explode?

CelestialDust
July 6th 2011
3170 Comments


didn't keep my interest for too long

spaceclaw6
July 6th 2011
40 Comments


"fuck this band"

this^

I love listening to the same banjo part over and over in every single one of their songs

wabbit
July 6th 2011
7059 Comments


god I hate this band more than any other band ever.

Knott-
Emeritus
July 6th 2011
10260 Comments


when you were young, i was not old, but our story was not told


Genius. Fucking genius. You know, I thought that real meaning and depth in songwriting had disappeared from the mainstream but here are Mumford & Sons, defiant and proud, proving me wrong yet a-fucking-gain.

FUCK.

THIS.

BAND.

Dogget
July 6th 2011
781 Comments


I like that one song by them that starts off fairly subdued but gradually builds up into a kind of crescendo.

Sanders
July 6th 2011
2416 Comments


I caught part of their Glastonbury set on tv and nearly punched my own face off.

sexualsoybean
July 7th 2011
931 Comments


Artificial, manufactured indie rock

TMobotron
July 7th 2011
7253 Comments


had no idea there was this much hate for these dudes. ive never heard them personally but a few of my friends i know like them

AliW1993
July 7th 2011
7511 Comments


It's just plastic and lifeless folk music with no imagination or genuine heart.

sleepyhead
July 7th 2011
593 Comments


nothing mindblowing, but nothing really wrong with it either

sexualsoybean
July 7th 2011
931 Comments


To be fair, they werent as grating when they first debuted but almost everyone paying attention could see where it was heading.

AliW1993
July 7th 2011
7511 Comments


Their music isn't atrocious, it's just so bland and inoffensive and blatently written purely to shift units.

Synesthete
July 7th 2011
240 Comments


|the hate for this band on sputnik| = |the love for limp bizkit|

LetoAtreides
July 7th 2011
314 Comments


Screw you

I love me some Mumford

inb4 some elitist prick combs my ratings to prove their superiority to me

Douglas
July 7th 2011
9303 Comments


I still like this band, fuck you all.

YouthCat
July 7th 2011
261 Comments


That was ok. Was never a huge fan of these guys, but there music is nice to listen to now and then. Never knew there was so much hate for them.

wabbit
July 7th 2011
7059 Comments


No this is everything that is wrong in modern music. I have no problem with vapid catchy harmless unoffensive bland boring unoriginal uninspired pop music (I like Enrique more than Godspeed) as long as it knows that is all it is. But this IS that but pretends to be "good" music which is just so bad and makes it fail artistically on every possible level...also their songs aren't well written and don't vary at all.

Deviant.
Staff Reviewer
July 7th 2011
32289 Comments


Oh do shut up rabbit

Douglas
July 7th 2011
9303 Comments


still say FUCK YOU ALL i love my mumford

Eko
July 7th 2011
2118 Comments


owl city is better and i mean that very seriously

DJD
July 7th 2011
42 Comments


Bah, "pretense" as a concept is just something people slap on music in recent times. But who calls Led Zeppelin pretentious? They didn't name their first four albums. Or Rush, who released Hemispheres (a prog album of 4 songs)? No, pretense is a rather dumbfounding term to use in the music industry.....

deepintheorchard
July 7th 2011
644 Comments


You hate this band because they got big you elitist fuckers. Stop being preschoolers.

rjmunthe
July 7th 2011
395 Comments


this band is good. fuck you guys. *listens to the cave*

ScrotieMcBoogerballs
July 7th 2011
116 Comments


deepintheorchard speaks the truth. You are all whiny turds that need to get pissed on. you've probably never seen or touched a vagina because that's too "mainstream" and only fags do unoriginal shit like that.

Platypuss
July 7th 2011
1 Comments


Loved it at first, then it got boring.

Aids
July 7th 2011
24509 Comments


don't like the music fine but don't accuse them of writing it just to "move units" that's retarded. they didn't blow up until about a year after their debut was released. I agree that they're kind of annoying now (I was rolling my eyes when I watched their set streaming from Coachella) but the hate they're getting here is just ridiculous. I saw them at Sasquatch "before they were big" and they were so good.

anyway fuck you all I still like this band. I don't love them but they're good.

CrownOfMagnets
July 7th 2011
2334 Comments


lol you guys calm the fuck down

deepintheorchard
July 7th 2011
644 Comments


Yeah that "writing to move units" part pissed me off also.

Aids
July 7th 2011
24509 Comments


yeah so just listened to the song. that was pretty bad.

now I don't know, was I wrong about this band? I don't remember Sigh No More being so fucking boring... but that song was... not good.

CrownOfMagnets
July 7th 2011
2334 Comments


it certainly was no deftones

NickelbackFTL
July 7th 2011
232 Comments


YES A MUMFORD & SONS BANJO SOLO

farglesnuff
July 7th 2011
241 Comments


i liked them when i first heard them, but they got old real fast cuz basically all the songs sound the
same. things got really out of hand when the masses tuned in, then i was outright sick of them.

Skoj
July 7th 2011
1885 Comments


You hate this band because they got big you elitist fuckers.

^^Yeah, this. It's one thing to think they're bland, but you children are taking it to hatred based solely on their level of popularity.

UnderJOath
July 7th 2011
79 Comments


OMG This band is popular? HATE HATE HATE HATE!!

sexualsoybean
July 7th 2011
931 Comments


don't like the music fine but don't accuse them of writing it just to "move units" that's retarded. they didn't blow up until about a year after their debut was released.

The fact they didnt catch on until 6-12 months after their debut is not proof that they arent a generic mass market "indie" band manufactured by a giant record label. I think the fact they came out of no where, did no touring really at all before their album, and had a giant budget video for their single 2 hours after the record was released speaks more about their credibility than the speed at which mainstream America decided to get on the bandwagon.

zxlkho
July 7th 2011
3493 Comments


meh

BloodSweatandBeers
July 7th 2011
1034 Comments


"No this is everything that is wrong in modern music. I have no problem with vapid catchy harmless unoffensive bland boring unoriginal uninspired pop music (I like Enrique more than Godspeed) as long as it knows that is all it is. But this IS that but pretends to be "good" music which is just so bad and makes it fail artistically on every possible level...also their songs aren't well written and don't vary at all."

lol, just wow lol

zxlkho
July 7th 2011
3493 Comments


Yeah, that was quite the epic fail.

RooseveltsGhost
July 7th 2011
863 Comments


lame as possible

BloodSweatandBeers
July 7th 2011
1034 Comments


"(I like Enrique more than Godspeed)"

that about sums it up right there

Aids
July 7th 2011
24509 Comments


sexualsoybean, your comment didn't respond to what I said really at all. their music was clearly not written to "move units" as their relative obscurity when their debut was released proves. if they were only in it to move units then why did they not pinch out an EP or two in the past year to rake in more cash? oh yeah because that's not why they make music.

like i said, dislike the music fine, but don't try to blame it on anything other than personal taste. itt people are hating this band for all the wrong reasons. except that lyric Knott quoted, that's a terrible lyric and a legitimate reason for disliking the song.

Deviant.
Staff Reviewer
July 7th 2011
32289 Comments


I've never felt the need to strangle a person I have never met before, but somehow Rabbit proves himself the catalyst for change once again

Waior
July 7th 2011
11778 Comments


i agree with everything aids said

Apollo
July 7th 2011
10691 Comments


god so many idiots posting

So its cool to hate this band because they are 'popular'? Stfu, seriously, you hipster fucking tards. You most of all Rabbit. Your a fucking idiot.

Sanders
July 7th 2011
2416 Comments


I can quite easily listen to one or two of their songs, but I couldn't listen to a whole album in one sitting. It's nothing to do with being elitist, I just find it boring.

LiveByFaith
July 7th 2011
141 Comments


because every fucking song sounds the same.

Waior
July 7th 2011
11778 Comments


yeah but that's not reason to call them worse than owl city i mean

i don't like them but i refuse to bandwagon and be all FUCK THIS SHIT THIS BAND IS THE BIGGEST PIECE OF RUBBISH SINCE THE HOLOCAUST because it's just okay, repetitive music with shit lyrics



Douglas
July 7th 2011
9303 Comments


i agree with everything aids{...}


You heard it here first folks!



Aids
July 7th 2011
24509 Comments


I was in love with Sigh No More when it came out, I gave it a 4.5 (I think i have it as a 3.5 now). Then like a year later everyone on sputnik started saying they were the worst band of all time. It was all very confusing for me; this is why you need to feed me my opinions on new music before I listen to it, come on sputnik.

Uranium
July 7th 2011
7549 Comments


it was.... ok?

IAmHollywood
July 7th 2011
1443 Comments


"The fact they didnt catch on until 6-12 months after their debut is not proof that they arent a generic mass market "indie" band manufactured by a giant record label. I think the fact they came out of no where, did no touring really at all before their album, and had a giant budget video for their single 2 hours after the record was released speaks more about their credibility than the speed at which mainstream America decided to get on the bandwagon."

Implying that musical quality degrades with funding. wait, what the fuck kind of logic is this?

Knott-
Emeritus
July 7th 2011
10260 Comments


The arguments in this thread have decided my 150th review for me.

Chrisjon89
July 7th 2011
3833 Comments


"Implying that musical quality degrades with funding. wait, what the fuck kind of logic is this?"

That's indie logic my man. For example, I'm a big fan of Arcade Fire and loved their album, The Suburbs. But then it won a Grammy, and although that didn't change their existing recordings per sé, their songs all changed at that moment.

And in all honesty I understand both sides of the argument for Mumford & Sons.

CutMan
July 7th 2011
1926 Comments


Ah, undue hate. I've been on the internet long enough that it doesn't motivate me to argue or actually get mad, but sometimes I just slump onto my desk and ask "Why...?"

I enjoyed it.

BonRurgundy
July 7th 2011
358 Comments


Haters are most likely stupid fat americans that don't like the accents or something. Mumford and Sons are the shit!

NateT
July 7th 2011
185 Comments


"You hate this band because they got big you elitist fuckers."

This. The hate for this band is unwarranted. They make good music and just because they're popular isn't a reason to dislike them... Damn, hipster society fucked up royally when it decided that a popular band can't be good.

TheStarclassicTreatment
July 7th 2011
2910 Comments


Incredible band. Still absolutely certain that these will go down as one the biggest bands of all time one day; they're gonna be timeless.

Dig this song, it's nice and chill. I still think they're yet to release a poor track.

conradtao
Emeritus
July 7th 2011
2090 Comments


"Haters are most likely stupid fat americans that don't like the accents or something. Mumford and Sons are the shit!"

Ha.

They're not egregiously bad or anything but they're very, very bland.

duckies
July 7th 2011
143 Comments


"There's something about Mumford And Sons that makes my skin crawl. I fucking despise them."

This a million times over.

HBFS
July 7th 2011
1562 Comments


good song

AjayStewart
July 7th 2011
73 Comments


Zzzz

Fortheloveofmusic
July 7th 2011
493 Comments


Wow, I didn't expect this when I made the article. I don't necessarily like this song, but I really enjoyed Sigh No More (I have it at a 4). I actually like that they're popular, it adds variation when I listen to the radio and Little Lion Man or The Cave comes on. I'm not saying that I don't enjoy pop radio, but some of it gets old over time. I admit, some of Mumford & Sons' songs bore me, but as a whole I think that they are a very talented band

nash1311
July 7th 2011
8045 Comments


Bands get big and all of a sudden people think they get hate because they are big. Use logic. If a band is now big or bigger, of course they will get more hate, because more people know about them and listen to them. More people probably like them too.

That being said, I have not listened to this band other than this song... and it was quite weak.

EDIT: Wow, like super weak. It went nowhere.

sexualsoybean
July 7th 2011
931 Comments


sexualsoybean, your comment didn't respond to what I said really at all.

Because I agree with you. I dont think they "write music to move units" thats just silly. However I do think they are bland, generic, boring and a bit manufactured.

I still have their album at a 3 or 3.5. I dont think they are terrible. I just hate that this is the indie band girls on facebook shout about when there are much better options out there.

rjmunthe
July 7th 2011
395 Comments


Writing music to move units? LOL, these fools didn't get popular until like 12 months after their album came out? Shut the hell up you f'ing douchebags. They aren't excellent, but there's lots of room for an improvement. I mean, it was a 3.

Aids
July 7th 2011
24509 Comments


That's indie logic my man. For example, I'm a big fan of Arcade Fire and loved their album, The Suburbs. But then it won a Grammy, and although that didn't change their existing recordings per sé, their songs all changed at that moment.


that is the most retarded thing ever. no they fucking didn't, you're just a dipshit who cares to much about how the public perceives the music you listen to. that album winning a grammy had literally zero effect on my enjoyment of the album. if it did for you then you suck at music, hard.

Knott, oh man excited. It will probably be like your Noah and The Whale review except I will disagree with it haha.

sexualsoybean
July 7th 2011
931 Comments


I'm a big fan of Arcade Fire and loved their album, The Suburbs. But then it won a Grammy, and although that didn't change their existing recordings per sé, their songs all changed at that moment.


This is a joke post right?

thebhoy
July 7th 2011
4460 Comments


too many people on this thread suck. Song was a step above anything on their debut, but it's still the same rehashed lifeless stuff.

Aids
July 7th 2011
24509 Comments


thebhoy - I thought it was a definite step down; I liked their debut.

QuestionableScum
July 7th 2011
116 Comments


The hate for Mumford and Sons is not simply because they got popular, but because there is a lot better indie folk that is much better than them, that gets no credit in the mainstream. Furthermore, Mumford and Sons music is quite gimmicky and tends to rely on a few songwriting cliches. The band is not bad, but for the most part they are just decent, not good by any stretch of the imagination.

mothercountry
July 7th 2011
447 Comments


the one reason why were talking about this right now; little lion man. they wrote one catchy song the masses could latch onto and it turned into a wildfire.

why the hate for this band and the people that listen to them? expand your musical horizons dude--



ziroth
July 7th 2011
1260 Comments


song was fine, wtf is everyone bitching about? band is kind of a bore but who the hell cares? listen to what you want to listen to why the hell do others opinions change yours? that's why they're opinions.

Eko
July 7th 2011
2118 Comments


everyone go read Knott's review right now

ziroth
July 7th 2011
1260 Comments


someone write a hipster-dissing counter review

Douglas
July 8th 2011
9303 Comments


still stay the are awesome

CrackwhoreBatshit
July 8th 2011
95 Comments


So yeah, fuck this band.

xcharlesx
July 8th 2011
192 Comments


good band, good band

IrishJay91
July 8th 2011
688 Comments


ew

Aspenshadow
July 8th 2011
376 Comments


Lol you guys are stupid. This band isn't nearly as bad as you make them out to be.

Chrisjon89
July 8th 2011
3833 Comments


Just clarifying that the first half of my comment was sarcasm. It was satire poking fun at the hipster mentality, based on reactions I saw after the Grammy win. I thought the way I worded the last sentence would be a giveaway, and I also said per sé.

Gotta relax Aids. Gonna bust a fufu valve.

WhiteNoise
July 8th 2011
3885 Comments


I had no idea it was cool to hate these guys!

808muzik
July 8th 2011
1153 Comments


Don't like them, but they aren't bad. Idiots in this thread.

porch
July 8th 2011
8459 Comments


sputnik cares very deeply about the sincerity and integrity of its chosen musical artists all of a sudden

porch
July 8th 2011
8459 Comments


going back to titus andronicus now thats real music about my real life

Dogget
July 8th 2011
781 Comments


Where's all this "manufactured" shit coming from. The main reason they blew up so fast is because they had connections with Laura Marling and through her record label people.

So many fucking chinstrokers on sputnik.

porch
July 8th 2011
8459 Comments


i just read apollo's responses here and in knotts thread, his blood is boiling

TheStarclassicTreatment
July 8th 2011
2910 Comments


The fact that so many people have called these 'manufactured' has made me realise that there are a lot of people on this site that don't understand the record industry.

freedomofspeechnoway
July 8th 2011
426 Comments


Comments in news articles like this is exactly why I love sputnik. Full of idiots.

freedomofspeechnoway
July 8th 2011
426 Comments


made me realise that there are a lot of people on this site that don't understand the record industry.


Sputnik is good for the laughs though.

steadyriot
July 9th 2011
477 Comments


stupid hipster poseurs. this band is great and this song is good

XSebbyMcMuffinX
July 9th 2011
490 Comments


This is a song. Not much else to say about it. I mean, my brain is telling me these notes sound good together (until the end, at least), but my heart was completely unaffected... Wouldn't give two shits about folk if this were to be considered good folk. Maybe that's why there's hate? B/c the popularity makes this a common interpretation of what folk is and that might make people who are open to the message but not into folk yet lose interest and discredit the genre without anyone to let them know any better? Which would be a disservice to good folk artists pouring out their tortured and well-weathered souls to try to make a more collectively fulfilling life experience. Just sayin'.

sexualsoybean
July 9th 2011
931 Comments


dont like bland, generic indie? FREAKIN HIPSTER POSER!!!

CrackwhoreBatshit
July 10th 2011
95 Comments


Hey everybody we're getting off topic here, remember...Fuck this band

Parallels
July 10th 2011
10144 Comments


This was horrendously overplayed at my work. I wanted to throw all the copies of it in the dollar sale bin.

tombits
July 11th 2011
3582 Comments


hate this band

bab808
July 11th 2011
456 Comments


"i thought this was a step up imo at least its not an exact soundalike to every song on their debut"

did you even listen to the funeral? lol

bab808
July 11th 2011
456 Comments


"i thought this was a step up imo at least its not an exact soundalike to every song on their debut"

did you even listen to the funeral? lol

squidwardtentacles
December 28th 2011
39 Comments


Fuck the haters, Sigh No More was a fantastic album.

feanaro
December 28th 2011
1055 Comments


nope.



You have to be logged in to post a comment. Login | Create a Profile





MOST VIEWED NEWS

Jesse Lacey Allegations
Jayyvon Opens Up About Abuse
The Fall of Troy bassist melts do..
The Story So Far's vocalist dropk..
Deftones stream new single
R.I.P. Lemmy
Killswitch Engage debut new single
Scott Weiland dead at 48
Nothing But Thieves accusations
Lil Peep Dead At 21



OTHER RECENT NEWS

Motley Crue returns
Dysrhythmia tease upcoming album
Knocked Loose x Poppy
Burzum announces new LP, single
Lotus Eater Machine on hiatus
Eye Release Second Single
Typhuzz kick off their jam
Hard Times for David Byrne
Conifere stream debut LP
Alcest release Flamme Jumelle
(Julie) Christmas in June
Amusi re-release Adapt in Codes
DGD Say Goodbye to Tilian
2nd new Six Feet Under single
Century tease upcoming tour, album

» see all news

RELATED REVIEWS
Mumford and Sons
Delta
Mumford and Sons
Johannesburg
Mumford and Sons
Wilder Mind
Mumford and Sons
Live From Bull Moose
Mumford and Sons
Babel
STAFF & CONTRIBUTORS // CONTACT US

Bands: A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z


Site Copyright 2005-2023 Sputnikmusic.com
All Album Reviews Displayed With Permission of Authors | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy