Its okay, i think. Starts off well, but gets kind of boring somewhere around the middle.
|
| |
Didn't they add the 1979 to their name to avoid any lawsuits or whatever?
|
| |
yeah, james murphy sent them a c&d because their name was identical to his label's. apparently now that nobody gives a shit about this band they're in the clear.
|
| |
song is kinda pretty boring tbh
w/e glad theyre doing something, still need to see them live
|
| |
Shit's meh
|
| |
Why does this sound like Muse
|
| |
What can I say, it's very catchy and I dig it.
|
| |
Awh, I liked the 1979 tag as well.
|
| |
ehh it seems like they're really losing their punk edge and going for a more radio-friendly sound and i don't think that's gonna work out too well in the end
|
| |
I liked the 1979 tag [2] | It grew on me.
Song's a snore
|
| |
Yeah the 1979 tag just fits now. Band already loses a bit of charisma from removing it.
And holy shit this does sound like Muse wow
|
| |
can't believe they changed the name back, their last album was disappointing, probably won't check this stuff out
|
| |
Last album was a grower, but this is certainly pushing the commercial aspect of the band; can't say I'm massive on the track, but it's not bad.
|
| |
Last album was a grower [2]
Gonna peep this later today.
|
| |
not enough fuzzy bass lines
I am sad
|
| |
eh, it was okay.
|
| |
is this the song from the newest silicon valley episode
|
| |
is their name a thrice reference?
|
| |
thrice sure is great
|
| |
This is about as exciting as the last Thrice album, yeah. Probably took full inspiration from them.
|
| |
This one doesnt sound like DFA1979 LUL I dont like it
|
| |