Hmm...spunky Metallica....
|
| |
I have a feeling this will actually be a pretty fine album
The new song sounds okay. The solo was kinda coolThis Message Edited On 12.10.06
|
| |
I have a feeling this is going to be St.Anger part 2. And for anyone else that doesnt know me by now on SputnikMusic, I am the biggest hater of St.Anger ever. Worst album Ive ever heard. Rod Stewart shitting his pants sounds better than that.
|
| |
Ok, the fact they fucked up their base guitar tells me they should have retired long ago (I mean, musicians make mistakes but never outright stop a song). Also, the song sucked so bad that I have lost hope for Metallica forever. The solo was aweful and reminded me that they have not even moved past The Black Album. How do you go from writing some of the best thrash metal ever to this. Metallica, please pack it in before you start writing songs like Nickleback.
|
| |
Yay to fan whorage over artistic integrity!!! :thumb:
|
| |
I actually liked this. Pretty good vocal job by Hetfield, considering it was improvised. This album will probably sound like St. Anger, but the drums will be in tune, there'll be solos and the production probably won't suck. So, I'm predicting a solid 3.5
|
| |
The recording quality is pretty good for a live recording. I don't really like the song though. Hetfield's voice sucks nowadays.
|
| |
I'm banking a lot on whether this is good or not. Their one chance of redemption is at hand...
|
| |
Hetfields' voice sucked on that. I liked the rest, though.
I think I'm gonna give Metallica a second chance.
|
| |
on the picture on ultimate-guitar hetfield looked like he was 90 years old
|
| |
haha i saw that.
|
| |
[quote=mynameischan]You'll rate it over a 3 even if it sucks so why does it matter?[/quote]
Goddamn you for beating me to it.
I'm predicting a solid pile of suck.
|
| |
meh, decent song, lyrics are nothing special but the solo kicks ass.
|
| |
Ahh! Someone else with a "Sludge" name!
|
| |
I don't think anyone would expect anything great if it's improvised.
I wouldn't be surprised if they weren't improvised, though.
|
| |
james's vocals are pretty much atrocious but the riff is cool
|
| |
Yea, that sounded pretty dull. The riff was boring. The vocals were bad. It sounds like St. Anger No. 2, but with a solo thrown in. The solo was actually pretty good, but the rest was boring. It's so hard to take Metallica seriously these days.
|
| |
You'll rate it over a 3 even if it sucks so why does it matter?
Then why do I have St. Anger pegged at 2.5, nub?
|
| |
because St. Anger sucks so much.
|
| |
Because you're a fanboy, which is the point I was making. Nub.
Well, I am a fanboy, but your point was null because St. Anger sucked and I didn't give it above a 3.
|
| |
i think it is funny how for every album since cliff has died, lars has been saying it's gonna be their best album since master.
|
| |
Kirk's technique has really gone downhill, the solo also lacked alot of melody. But the most shocking thing of all is that there was no wah wah! Hopefully by the time the actual CD is done Hetfield will have worked on his vocals, Hammet will have more time to come up with melodic solos, and the final thing wont suck.
|
| |
not expecting much out of them, hopefully they'll surprise me
|
| |
the riff to the new song is cool but the vocals really kill it.
25 songs? they should make this a 2 disk album to make up for st anger
This Message Edited On 12.10.06
|
| |
Wow. This gets a suck minus. I don't care if its improvised.
|
| |
I HOPE the new cd isn't St.Anger 2.
I HOPE! I HOPE! I HOPE!
I'm confident it won't be as bad as St. Anger, but I have a feeling it'll be a bad ReLoad.
If this cd tanks, the best thing for them would be to die in a plane crash.
That way they won't have to they'll be looked at as classic Talica. The new stuff will be ignored.
|
| |
[quote=chan the god]No, my point is not null because when you review this album you'll probably hail it as a return to form for Metallica and give it at least a 3. I wasn't saying anything about ratings of previous Metallica albums, I merely predicted what you will give this album.[/quote]
pwned
This Message Edited On 12.10.06
|
| |
average songThis Message Edited On 12.11.06
|
| |
this is great, this new album might actually be good. the only downside is the graying hair.......
|
| |
Well, I am a fanboy, but your point was null because St. Anger sucked and I didn't give it above a 3.
But you proved his point by admitting that St. Anger sucked, while you still have a 2,5, or average, rating for it.
|
| |
Hahaha holy crap this is awful
|
| |
I have not seen this video. Do I want to?
|
| |
Damn, the sound stopped wrking on my computer today!
I think most of the songs on Anger were better than most on Load & Reload (cept for a few standouts like Outlaw & Fixxxer & Bleeding Me), but this band has been all but dead since Justice.
And yet still, they've fired Bob Rock! And Rick Rubin has been known to work miracles (even though Slipknot took a dive when they replaced Ross Robinson w Rubin). But still - Maybe Rubin can bring Metallica some Slayer magic.
|
| |
OK, I fixed my sound and I watched the video.
Lyrics: suck ass
intro: suck ass
solo: awesome!
thrashy bridge: awesome!
Progression: pretty good
song as a whole: eh
It was ok... but my hopes are stillpretty dashed
|
| |
I'm gonna go download some Sepultura, I suggest you all do the same
|
| |
Helll yea that new song kicks maximum ass i wasnt feelin it too much at first but it really grew on me and i cant stop listening to it! i just think james shouldnt try and yell/scream the chorus (yea he cant do that well lol) other than that AMAZING old school solo from the best kirk hammett cant wait 4 this new album
|
| |