I don't review enough to realistically apply for contributor 
|
| |
I now know what an Emeritus is.
|
| |
Pick me! Wait, I don't acually do well anything... damnit...
|
| |
I'm too lazy to even find out how to get a custom avatar
|
| |
I guess I should apply since I won't be as busy with school this term. Of course I'll probably be gone all summer....
|
| |
who wants to take my place!
123
|
| |
I could have sworn last time this cropped up I told myself I'd start actually churning out some reviews. I appear to have not done so.
|
| |
Alligator for staff. lolestation will follow
|
| |
I'm your man. Totally.
|
| |
I'll contribute. With my butt
|
| |
I'd like to be a contributor/staff at somepoint, but given I've only written 4 reviews (2 in the works), I wouldn't really say I qualify.
|
| |
neither i.
|
| |
me too,
|
| |
There's always next year I guess.....
|
| |
I'll contribute. With my butt
Isn't that what all contributors do? jklol
|
| |
"I'd like to be a contributor/staff at somepoint, but given I've only written 4 reviews (2 in the works), I wouldn't really say I qualify."
same here.
|
| |
Oy, I'd just like to make it official that my butt does NOT in any way contribute to Sputnikmusic.com.
|
| |
they should have a 'lazy contributors' section.
we'd all fit in swell.
|
| |
Might be fun.
|
| |
If I up my output somewhat I might be able to get a contributor position, so I'll apply after I've submitted a few more.
|
| |
Ross, (in Rob Schneider voice) "you can do it".
|
| |
Alligator for staff. lolestation will follow
Staff and 21st Century Breakdown sound WAY too alikeThis Message Edited On 03.29.09
|
| |
F**k, you're a cheeky ba$tard DavID.
|
| |
You don't need to have a huge output to be a staff writer or contributer, just need to find a nice balance between output vs. quality. Even if you've only submitted a few reviews, if they're good enough quality then you'll merit consideration.
|
| |
Whoot Davey for staff
|
| |
What... I don't need to have a huge output to be a contributor? And here I am writing 2 reviews a week. F**k quality, quantity is where it's at. ;-)
Seriously, I second what Daniel said.
And Ross, I ain't applying for staff until you become contributor*
(* comment can be changed, denounced or spat on at any time in which DaveyBoy sees fit)
|
| |
Well, the reviews I've submitted thus far are (I think anyway) of pretty good quality. Still, prob best to get some more experience before I apply.
|
| |
Yeah I can never understand how people can listen to an album just once and rate/review it straight after
|
| |
Yeh, a review i'm working on I think I've listened to the album at least 20 times now. I'm also incredibly lazy.
|
| |
i agree, i dont understand how people can process that much information on their first listen.
unless its chris cornell, then its just an automatic F for FREAKIN horrible
|
| |
I give myself a minimum of 6 listens before I review an album, although it is usually more.
|
| |
I don't think the number of times you listen to an album before reviewing matters too much. Some times I can formulate pretty strong opinions after a couple of listens, with other albums I spend a lot of time trying to grasp the essence of it.
There is no right or wrong answer as to how long you should listen to an album for before submitting a review on it.
|
| |
i think i write pretty solid reviews, but id love to be able to churn them out quicker. Itd be nice if there was a set forumla on how to write a good review haha
|
| |
Yeah, generally I write reviews about 3 to 5 spins and a day or two after I listen to it. Some exceptions can be made because i've written a review or two based off of 1 or 2 listens. I don't care.
|
| |
unless its chris cornell, then its just an automatic F for FREAKIN horrible
Thats exactly what I did on my review! I usually give new stuff about a week to sink in, but I judged that on pretty much my first listen. I've given it a few more spins and it hasn't grown on me one bit. I might apply but I've gt exams soon so meh i dunno.
|
| |
hello contributor! gogogogogoogog
|
| |
balls > all on resume grrr
|
| |
id apply for contributor, but stupid people neg my reviews just because of who I am. While I don't mind when they neg them because the review sucked, they normally just neg without an explanation so I ASSume.
|
| |
I hate you and I don't even know who you are!
|
| |
ditto man, ditto.
|
| |
staff more like wut
|
| |
Rasputin for mod I say.
|
| |
silverfang for shut the fuck up i say
|
| |
Rasputin for Administration I say.
|
| |
okay you got me
|
| |
I know, it's just the highest form of this sites' ranks man, you can't beat that.
|
| |
Get off Rasputins dick Fang.
|
| |
lol Jeze balls, low fucking blow.
|
| |
IDK people say that I write decent reviews, but I think that I should have a bit more experience before I apply.
|
| |
Gar- there's no way I would qualify for this now, I was hoping it would be sometime a little farther in the future. Oh well... maybe next time.
|
| |
Seriously guys, if you write well, you should apply... I got contributor status after only like 6 reviews.
|
| |
I'm working on it - I've been here for about a year, this is a new account. I wanted a fresh and clean approach. I hope to contribute quite a bit to the site this year. I'm interviewing a band this weekend, reviewing a new album later this week, and I'm getting a list together of artists/albums to add. Maybe same time next year I'll be able to say "I'm your man."
|
| |
I'll just have to crank out a few (quality) reviews between now and then. I have the new Doves and new Silversun Pickups release in the works... maybe that'll help my chances.
|
| |
I should apply. If I got contributor status it'd spur me on to write more reviews.
|
| |
Contributing reviewer shouldn't just be about writing reviews. It should be more versatile, like adding albums/bands to database, posting news posts, throw ina njournal or two, and essentially get people into shit.
|
| |
I add bands, albums, news articles, journals....not so much, but only because I don't know how to.
I'll probably leave it 'til the next time round.This Message Edited On 03.29.09
|
| |
I'd love to apply, but all I really do is review and comment in reviews (i do try and keep posts constructive/friendly though, for the most part)
Maybe next time, eh?
|
| |
I'd apply, but I haven't written a single review...
|
| |
Applied.
|
| |
Best of luck
|
| |
My reviews are not up to par.
|
| |
You kidding me wizard? You got some damn good reviews, I think you should go for Contributor.
|
| |
Contributor status is not metuhl enough for wiz, maybe if it was Kontributor or something...This Message Edited On 03.29.09
|
| |
lol, oh btw, good luck mark, I hope you get it, you're also a good reviewer.
|
| |
I don't think anyone should be discouraged from applying. I haven't read any of Wizard's review, but I know there's a need for "metal" guys.
|
| |
I would apply but I suck at reviewing and don't review enough. I do add quite a bit of albums, bands, & news though.
|
| |
get off Rasputins vagina.
|
| |
Out?
|
| |
just threw my hat into the ring.
|
| |
There are many hats friend.
|
| |
Posted.
|
| |
THORS FOR STAFF! CHANGE WE CAN BELIEVE IN!
|
| |
I know this one has only just started up...but can anyone tell me know when the next opening will be coming up, because I think I'll try and up my output/improve my writing and apply then.This Message Edited On 03.29.09
|
| |
^^^Ditto man
|
| |
lol i've never even posted news before...
|
| |
thats the whole point you noob!
|
| |
i know, i was using sarcasm...
|
| |
no you werent why lie no need
|
| |
can i have emeritus under my name just because it looks cool?
|
| |
I'm inactive, and boring. But you know, asides from that...
Good luck to those aspiring.
|
| |
when will there be the next opportunity to apply?
|
| |
I don't want to agree with willfellmarsy but this would be nice:
maybe we can bring back the my discussions tab so the site is worth going on again
|
| |
lol
|
| |
i dont get enough albums anyway....
|
| |
Promote Kane to being a mod so he can ban himself!
|
| |
Can I suggest somebody who probably won't want the position?
Roofi. Srsly.
|
| |
maybe we can bring back the my discussions tab so the site is worth going on again
why was it removed in the first place?
....worst decision really
|
| |
what, so having easy access to your last posts on whats basically a forum is a bad thing?
oh right i see now.
|
| |
all it would show was fucking shit you commented on like 3 years ago it was retarded
A more helpful comment would be to suggest to Jeremy that if he brings back the My Discussions tab, that he code it so that it only shows discussions that you have commented on in the last 2 weeks or something.
|
| |
zingggg
|
| |
more helpful comment would be to suggest to Jeremy
Expecting Chan to submit a helpful comment is like expecting cheese not to go mouldy.
|
| |
sputnikmusic needs more classical reviews
|
| |
It needs more reviews for every genre, so lets all hop to it.
|
| |
sputnikmusic needs more classical reviews
I see what you did there.
|
| |
probs best news so far this day
|
| |