Haha, I'd love to see him review some Fueled By "Wentz" stuff... HONESTLY!
|
| |
The dedicated musicians are the ones that do things other than be in a band. Even though he's in a shitty band, props.
|
| |
Still doesn't compare to Bruce Dickinson or Dexter Holland, but at least he's trying to be something other than a one-trick pony.
|
| |
i bet he's been on sputnik all this time. as eliminator.
|
| |
He can't be any worse than their "actual" critics.
|
| |
^seconded
|
| |
someone who writes awful music being critical of others works? how does he get the nerve?
|
| |
I am guessing quite a few of the reviewers here are awful artists.
|
| |
He's not awful, it's Wentz who's stupid.
I like Stump the best in FoB, he's got a good voice, so props to himThis Message Edited On 02.06.09
|
| |
I was wondering if Rolling Stone had realized they were a joke of a music publication yet, I guess now I have my answer.
|
| |
He is qualified to be a critic in the same way that Hitler is qualified to run the NAACP.
|
| |
meh, anybody in the music industry, whether they write, record or produce etc can say whatever they want because thats the area they are knowledgable in. so even if you can't stand FOB (like me), It's stupid to say this guy CAN'T voice his opinion.
|
| |
What?! Now Wentz is a reviewer?! What the-oh... my bad.
|
| |
He's a pretty good reviewer. Made me want to to get the Peter Tosh thing.
|
| |
Patrick Stump is more eloquent and more knowledgeable about the technical aspects of music than just about anybody on this site. It's hilarious to watch you all criticise him.
That's what I was thinking.
|
| |
Other than being popular, in what way does Fall Out Boy suck? I've never heard a legitimate reason why
|
| |
