RIAA Fines up to $1.5 Million

2008-01-30 by Trey STAFF | 23 Comments
The RIAA's litigious nature is well known, as is the group's habit of seeking massive damages from anyone that tries to dispute the group's accusations of file sharing but ends up losing in court. $150,000 per album illegally shared has been the ludicrously high going rate in recent court battles, but if the RIAA succeeds in pressuring Congress to pass the PRO-IP Act, statutory damages will rise as high as $1.5-million in the case of compilation albums illegally shared.

A fine of $150k is enough to put many individuals and families into the poor house. $1.5-million is pretty much a life-breaker for 99% of the population, and even bankruptcy in the face of such a claim will mean a destitute life afterwards. Illegal file sharing is wrong, but is the singular act of sharing a movie soundtrack enough to justify crushing entire lives and families permanently? The RIAA's lack of touch with reality is has been blatant for years. Sadly, the greatest defense the American people have against the entity is Congress, which, should it allow the PRO-IP act to pass, will prove itself entirely divorced from the concerns of the general citizenry.

Note: I know that IGN is frowned upon at this site, but it's news not a music review from our friend...

http://gear.ign.com/articles/848/848771p1.html

Tagged:

Comments:Add a Comment 
Thor
January 31st 2008
10354 Comments


Get the album when it leaks and preorder it...that's my policy.

AngelPhoenix
January 31st 2008
2761 Comments


Get the album when it leaks and if it's good, preorder/buy it. If it sucks, which many do, just delete the damn thing. That's my policy ;)
This Message Edited On 01.30.08

kmagnum
January 31st 2008
81 Comments


Yay for Canada and the blind eye to piracy!

*salute*

ColdDamnation
January 31st 2008
159 Comments


in all areas of reality, (excluding, "legal rights") they have no fucking right to claim that much money over any one person.
I swear, if I was a violent person, I'd spend whatever life I have to kill those crooked fuckers.
they're just about the only inspiration I would ever have to become a lawyer.
I almost hope they do try to file a lawsuit against me, just so I can spit in their piece of shit faces.

ColdDamnation
January 31st 2008
159 Comments


seriously...maybe once record labels start putting out quality music, I'll stop my pirating ways. legally, I'm a couple billion dollars in the hole...sweet deal! keep it coming.

...that is ludicrously overkilling on the value of one item...I don't think human lives are valued at that these days. I can't believe they're not being prosecuted as criminals, where do they get that number? did they sit around a table and brainstorm until they arrived on, "ok, so if we prove somebody is in the wrong just ONE time, we have rights over every penny they've saved and every penny they work for from this point on"
...I don't understand what gave them a right to arrive on that sort of fine. get real, bank robbers are my new heros...

ColdDamnation
January 31st 2008
159 Comments


"Hilary Rosen, the RIAA's president and chief executive officer from 1998 to 2003, was an outspoken critic of peer to peer file sharing[citation needed], and under her direction, the RIAA waged an aggressive legal campaign trying to eliminate file-sharing worldwide. Rosen has since expressed "concern that the lawsuits have outlived most of their usefulness," and that music devices should try "to work better together."

ColdDamnation
January 31st 2008
159 Comments


"In November, 2006, a Judge in a Brooklyn Federal court upheld the legal theory behind a defense claiming that the RIAA's damages theory — which calls for aggregating statutory damages of $750 per song in its lawsuits — is unconstitutional, since the record companies' actual damages are less than $0.70 per song."

Oblivioncry
January 31st 2008
602 Comments


so if i steal some music compilation in the local store and give it some friend of mine, i have committed a 1,5 million dollar crime

WTF???



SynGates
January 31st 2008
2467 Comments


How would they know if you did or not

Jacaranda
January 31st 2008
684 Comments


write your congress on this one fella's

i wrote one of my senators for gov't and this was my topic.

sickjesus
January 31st 2008
163 Comments


these people are fucking evil

jrowa001
January 31st 2008
8752 Comments


are the RIAA ran by old white men? because if so they have just found another way to make more money. they just care about what's best for them, and that is to take everybody's money

barbarian
January 31st 2008
341 Comments


While the RIAA has a death grip on a few classic artists, come on, most of their music sucks. You should be fined for downloading that crap!

Psyclone
January 31st 2008
432 Comments


[quote=kmagnum]Yay for Canada and the blind eye to piracy!



*salute*[/quote]
:chug:

XSebbyMcMuffinX
January 31st 2008
490 Comments


So I guess the way they see it is if you steal a cheeseburger's worth of money from people who do nothing but sit on their asses all day (sorry, I'm not quite aware of what record company execs do), they have the right to take every penny out of your pocket?

I'm in a band and I support piracy. Shut the fuck up, you pricks.
That's it, I'm moving to Sweden.

hegster90
January 31st 2008
96 Comments


Well with EMI (i believe) pulling out i guess they're getting desperate.
It is unconstitutional, and they've been doing things that way for a while now.
It's only a matter of time before they run themselves into the ground.

Fosster3567
January 31st 2008
76 Comments


Most bands don't give a **** if people download their stuff illegally. Why? Because only the greedy record companies profit from the actual music. I buy cd's, just not that often. The exception is if the band needs the money and self release their stuff.

You want to support a band? Go see them live and buy their merch. That's what I do. F*ck the RIAA.

SCREAM!
January 31st 2008
15755 Comments


Wow....I'd be a few billion in the red by now....

Gotta love canada

ColdDamnation
January 31st 2008
159 Comments


the actual chances of them winning a 1.5M lawsuit, are very, very slim.

ColdDamnation
January 31st 2008
159 Comments


it would have to be against the inventor of Torrents or the people who host servers to soulseek, something like that.

JumpTheF**kUp
February 1st 2008
2722 Comments


Guys.
Just check this site before downloading anything and you're all set
http://www.riaaradar.com/

camdizzle
February 1st 2008
58 Comments


To me this is just a desperate gesture from a shrinking industry. They really should have just started selling CDs for much cheaper...

Steerpike
February 1st 2008
1861 Comments


I think we're looking at the last days of the RIAA. This move is bound to infuriate people and sound the deathknell.

Even if the RPO-IP act passes, I'd like to see them enforce it without having to bribe a judge first.



You have to be logged in to post a comment. Login | Create a Profile





MOST VIEWED NEWS

Jesse Lacey Allegations
Jayyvon Opens Up About Abuse
The Fall of Troy bassist melts do..
The Story So Far's vocalist dropk..
Deftones stream new single
R.I.P. Lemmy
Killswitch Engage debut new single
Scott Weiland dead at 48
Nothing But Thieves accusations
Lil Peep Dead At 21



OTHER RECENT NEWS

In Aevum Agere stream new LP
Motley Crue returns
Dysrhythmia tease upcoming album
Knocked Loose x Poppy
Burzum announces new LP, single
Lotus Eater Machine on hiatus
Eye Release Second Single
Typhuzz kick off their jam
Hard Times for David Byrne
Conifere stream debut LP
Alcest release Flamme Jumelle
(Julie) Christmas in June
Amusi re-release Adapt in Codes
DGD Say Goodbye to Tilian
2nd new Six Feet Under single

» see all news

STAFF & CONTRIBUTORS // CONTACT US

Bands: A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z


Site Copyright 2005-2023 Sputnikmusic.com
All Album Reviews Displayed With Permission of Authors | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy