wyankeif1337
01.10.11 | list is recent digs. so pumped right now for new Ulcerate. |
wyankeif1337
01.10.11 | but isn't that the average rating? i thought objectivity also had to do with other shit |
couldwinarabbit
01.10.11 | It is when you rate not on how much you like an album but how good it is/how much I like it. |
Satellite
01.10.11 | FAQs
what the fuck are they? |
Spec
01.10.11 | ^ |
Hawks
01.10.11 | 10 is so good. |
wyankeif1337
01.10.11 | asshats
what the fuck are they?
but what i want to know is how the rating is actually calculated, it doesn't say there |
Josh D.
01.10.11 | Probs. |
wyankeif1337
01.10.11 | but that's what the Average Rating is |
deathofasalesman
01.10.11 | The average number of average ratings for each rating averaged. |
wyankeif1337
01.10.11 | it all makes sense now |
TomArnoldsArmpit
01.10.11 | Objectivity... how does it work? |
wyankeif1337
01.10.11 | miracles |
pizzamachine
01.10.11 | Neighbors... how do they work? |
deathofasalesman
01.10.11 | I'm against objectivity. |
pizzamachine
01.10.11 | u racist? |
TomArnoldsArmpit
01.10.11 | Ha! |
Hyperion1001
01.10.11 | It's bullshit, music taste isn't objective. |
liledman
01.10.11 | 3.00 avg rating is 100% objectivity, says so when you hover over your rating. pretty self-explanatory.
the musical neighbours thing on here is nowhere near as good as the rym one. |
Leatherneck
01.10.11 | yeah but what if you rate every album a 3.0, is that going to give you a 100% objectivity?
i don't think so, the ecuation is a little bit complicated and it has something to do with the rating variance
|
bloc
01.10.11 | There needs to be a rating variance, yet the average rating needs to be as close to a 3 as possible to get 100% |
omnipanzer
01.10.11 | "I think its like a mean of all your ratings"
and then compared to the mean of all other users. |
tiesthatbind
01.10.11 | It really doesn't matter, but yeah basically what they said^ |
americanmusicmachine
01.10.11 | |
