Death From Above 1979
The Physical World


4.0
excellent

Review

by brandaao USER (5 Reviews)
September 8th, 2014 | 48 replies


Release Date: 2014 | Tracklist

Review Summary: Fact: This is one of the best albums I've heard so far in 2014

Since 2004 I’ve been incessantly searching for new bands, new sounds, but, somehow, i’ve never heard about Death From Above 1979 before. It’s actually quite amusing that I stumbled before their work right after becoming impressed with Royal Blood’s recently released debut and realising how much a bass-drum duo was not just actually feasible, but had potential for some really impressive and captivating stuff.

The main difference between Royal Blood’s and Death From Above 1979’s sound is that the former has more of a hard rock sound, with heavier cadenced riffs, and the latter is kind of a disco punk, with faster and more direct riffing.

Apparently, DFA1979’s debut is a really cherished album, and, given the fact that it was released ten years ago, expectations were really high for “The Physical World”. I have never listened to their previous record, so, for me, this is an unbiased look on their new material and all I can say is that this is some pretty good stuff. The songs featured in this album are energetic, filled with catchy choruses and attention grabbing riffs. This album is filled with so many great moments that it makes its short length (only 34 minutes) seem even shorter.

Standout tracks are “Right On, Frankenstein!”, which is a track that goes by in a pretty standard manner and then features a great breakdown that catches the listener by surprise; “Crystal Ball” with its heavy and groovy riff makes it impossible for whoever is listening don’t want to move their body and the title track that closes the record in high fashion. “The Physical World” is probably the heaviest between the 11 tracks and features some excellent drum work and great riffing that hits the listener with a wall of sound before breaking down in some Sabbath-like bridge. It’s unexpected, and it’s awesome.

Spotify recommended me these guys based on my music taste and I confess that, mostly out of ignorance, I wasn’t expecting nothing great from them, but I’m glad I was wrong. I’ve been spinning this record a lot in the last few days and I’m pretty sure that when december comes, The Physical World will be featuring one of the top 3 positions in my favorite albums of the year list. This is fun, this is compelling, this is some serious beer chugging and mosh pitting music.


user ratings (326)
3.6
great
other reviews of this album
Rudy K. EMERITUS (3)
Indeterminate form....

paradox1216 (4)
The virgins in Paris may be gone, but Death From Above 1979 is back....

WizardZombie (3.5)
10 years is a long wait, but hopefully the longest we have to wait for another DFA album...



Comments:Add a Comment 
brandaao
September 8th 2014


248 Comments


Is this too short?

Please, constructive feedback would be awesome. I'm still learning how to write reviews in English...

ps: album is awesome, everybody should check it out.

BMDrummer
September 8th 2014


15100 Comments


and so it begins

Frippertronics
Emeritus
September 8th 2014


19513 Comments

Album Rating: 3.0 | Sound Off

would recommend using less verbs in first-person, but it's all fine besides that

brandaao
September 8th 2014


248 Comments


Hey Fripper, I actually wanted to describe my experience and surprise from discovering this album but it
kinda got a little bit repetitive.

Thanks for the feedback though

VheissuCrisis
Emeritus
September 8th 2014


1389 Comments

Album Rating: 3.5

Review is too basic, but if English isn't your first language then props for giving it a go.



An example of where you should be expanding and selling the album more:



"Standout tracks are “Right On, Frankenstein!”, which is a track that goes by in a pretty standard manner and then features a great breakdown that catches the listener by surprise" -- You say its a standout track and then quickly say it mostly goes on in a standard manner, expand on your point on the breakdown or mention other good things about the track, describe it a bit.



"i’ve had never heard about Death From Above 1979 before." Get rid of the had here. I'm not going to neg, but encourage you given that you're still learning, and obviously trying.

Jots
Emeritus
September 8th 2014


7562 Comments


Yeah, review is pretty ok. Being a DFA1979 fan already I was hoping for something that would tell me something I didn't already know from listening to their first album...

I mean, if it's their first album in 10 years then you should've done your research and listened to the first one. I get the whole 'unbiased perspective' thing, but obviously people reading this might expect something more.

Sleaper
September 8th 2014


3480 Comments

Album Rating: 2.5

this album bored me to death...was semi disappointed

brandaao
September 8th 2014


248 Comments


@VheissuCrisis
Thanks for the feedback!
I'll definitely work harder on describing the songs, and the album on my next review.

@JohnnyOnTheSpot
From what I've read about people's 'affection' torwards the first record, my intention to do this one
without listening to the "You're a Woman..." was deliberate. I'm sure there will be other reviews that'll
make comparisons between both albums, so I kinda wanted my one to be different, to appeal to non fans. But
I get what you mean. Thanks for the comment though.



Jots
Emeritus
September 8th 2014


7562 Comments


A review can appeal to non-fans without making comparisons to the debut album, I agree. However, the vast majority of the
people excited for this record are already fans of their other LP.

Now, if we assumed that wasn't the case, this review doesn't really make that strong a case for the album. If I wasn't already
interested in the album before reading the review, your description of it would have done nothing to peak my interest.

It's just not a very 'strategic' review on your part. I didn't neg, but I honestly don't know why you chose to review this

brandaao
September 8th 2014


248 Comments


I get what you're saying. I probably should've realised this review better. I guess I rushed myself into writing it.

I'll take these next few days to improve this review.



Kman418
September 8th 2014


13271 Comments


yeah surprisingly good

Gyromania
September 8th 2014


37091 Comments


in agreement with vheissu regarding criticisms, but keep at it man.

i'm glad to hear this is good

clander270
September 8th 2014


433 Comments

Album Rating: 4.0

Album rules, not as great as their debut though in my opinion

Albus
September 9th 2014


89 Comments

Album Rating: 3.5

Cheap Talk is basically Romantic Rights Part 2. But dem riffs are still awesome. Also the closer is probably their best song ever.

makrand
September 9th 2014


52 Comments

Album Rating: 3.5

Great review. Posd'

Ricochet
September 9th 2014


2690 Comments


"fact" ...**writes opinion**

Frippertronics
Emeritus
September 9th 2014


19513 Comments

Album Rating: 3.0 | Sound Off

Sputnik in a nutshell

Ricochet
September 9th 2014


2690 Comments


nutnik in a sputshell

osmark86
September 9th 2014


11387 Comments


so sources tell me this really isn't as impressive as anticipation would have it. are my sources at fault?

Frippertronics
Emeritus
September 9th 2014


19513 Comments

Album Rating: 3.0 | Sound Off

it all depends on how high your expectations are. it's best to not to have them abnormally high.



You have to be logged in to post a comment. Login | Create a Profile





STAFF & CONTRIBUTORS // CONTACT US

Bands: A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z


Site Copyright 2005-2023 Sputnikmusic.com
All Album Reviews Displayed With Permission of Authors | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy