Darkthrone
Transilvanian Hunger


5.0
classic

Review

by bloodsorcery USER (3 Reviews)
April 16th, 2011 | 68 replies


Release Date: 1994 | Tracklist

Review Summary: So cold, so pure...


Contemporary popular music has brought about a rather strange development in artistic creation, mainly that it has become the norm for it to be collaborative or at least semi-collaborative. This has of course led to eclectic experiments and some major creative triumphs. Yet I believe that something is lost in this collective approach, perhaps a bit of coherence, clearness in vision and direction. But most importantly some truth is lost, because the only time any of us is truly honest is when we are all by our lonesome. Even with our closest friends we change, however slightly; the purity of our thoughts is lost, truth is sacrificed.

“Beauty is truth, truth beauty, and that is all ye need to know”
-John Keats

Da Vinci could have never painted the Mona Lisa with a friend. Miguel Angel demanded to be left alone as he toiled for years painting the walls of the Sistine Chapel. Beethoven’s 9th was a product of his continuing isolation, his accumulating grief, his increasing solitude. Similarly, Fenriz could not possibly have written this album in any other manner rather than in complete solitude.

“But wait Tony” black metal history buffs will cry, “Varg wrote the lyrics to most of the songs! And Nocturno Culto recorded the vocals! You’re an imbecile!” While these facts are certainly true (save the last one) let us look at them more carefully. Varg wrote the lyrics to most songs, sure, but I can bet my ass that none of you understand the lyrics he wrote for the album (in fact less than 1% of the world’s population could, assuming they could decipher the shrieking) and the only ones you do understand are those written by Fenriz, and they are thus the only ones that add to your experience of the album. As for Nocturno, sure, he contributes vocals, but he had no creative input into the album.

And it is thus that we can state once more, with confidence, that this album is all Fenriz’s. So ***ing what? Well, what differentiates Transilvanian Hunger from most other black metal albums is a feeling of purity, of authenticity, of honesty. The riffs are jam-packed with brutally real desperation and anger, not an ounce sounds faked or forced. The relentless and shameless repetition and monotony (the first four songs are all in the exact same tempo and have the exact same beat throughout) are evidence of how self-indulgent the album truly is: Fenriz doesn’t need to make compromises for anyone or anything, bandmates, producers, all these superfluous elements of the process are eradicated and Fenriz is left to pour himself out on the music.

So why then is not every single one man-band this ***ing good? Firstly because Fenriz is a good musician, one who understood his genre and expanded upon the best characteristics of his influences to create a masterpiece. From Bathory he took the widespread use of shifting intervals, from Von the unrelenting blasts and the guitar sound. But perhaps far more important than this is the fact that Fenriz was going through a very troubled and confusing period of his life at the time of the recording, and thus every note is vibrant with sincere darkness, anger, hatred and sorrow. To capture raw emotion and then filter it through knowledge and skill in a particular craft is the making of all lasting and influential art, and thus is Transilvanian Hunger.

This album could not have been made by a group, be it a duo or an octet. This album could not have been discussed and analyzed even with a producer. That’s because this album is pure, honest, raw emotion. That’s because this album is ***ing trve.


user ratings (1649)
4.2
excellent


Comments:Add a Comment 
bloodsorcery
April 16th 2011


109 Comments

Album Rating: 4.0 | Sound Off

More so than a review I guess this is just kind of me pretentiously babbling on about one of my favorite albums but oh well. I had fun writing it as I hope you do reading it.

gaslightanthem
April 16th 2011


5208 Comments


darkwho?

Defeater
April 16th 2011


5780 Comments


I like the concept and emphasis of the individual presented in the review; it's true, there are as many moments of personal genius throughout history as there are collaborative efforts. Personally, I don't like the use of cuss words in a review because it takes away a little credibility while removing a lot of professionalism. And the swearing doesn't really add anything either. This is a great first review though.

Crysis
Emeritus
April 16th 2011


17626 Comments

Album Rating: 3.5

Not a 5

bloodsorcery
April 16th 2011


109 Comments

Album Rating: 4.0 | Sound Off

Thanks Defeater, I'll keep that in mind for next time. I wanted to expand upon that whole concept of the individual and throw Descartes into the review too but I thought it would have gotten a bit too pretentious, haha.

twlight
April 16th 2011


8742 Comments


Great review, makes me want to listen to this album more with a new perspective on it. Pos'd

Mordecai.
April 17th 2011


8406 Comments

Album Rating: 4.5

not gonna read but fuck yes pos for 5'ing this

AngelofDeath
Emeritus
April 17th 2011


16303 Comments

Album Rating: 3.5

Not a 5[2]

Wizard
April 17th 2011


20510 Comments

Album Rating: 3.5

Crysis and AngelofDeath are the only ones who know what's up with this album. I'm starting to like their newer stuff more than this.

Crysis
Emeritus
April 17th 2011


17626 Comments

Album Rating: 3.5

Panzerfaust, A Blaze and Under A Funeral Moon are all much more enjoyable. This has the title track and that's more or less it.

Hawks
April 17th 2011


87529 Comments

Album Rating: 5.0

Their first 4 black metal albums are all pretty great and hard to rank for me.

Relinquished
April 17th 2011


48734 Comments

Album Rating: 4.5

of course hawks they would be hard to rank for you

Hawks
April 17th 2011


87529 Comments

Album Rating: 5.0

Don't sass me motherfucker!

AngelofDeath
Emeritus
April 17th 2011


16303 Comments

Album Rating: 3.5

I'm starting to like their newer stuff more than this.




'Cause you're cool, Karl.

VeilOfOsiris
April 17th 2011


380 Comments

Album Rating: 1.0

garbage

AngelofDeath
Emeritus
April 17th 2011


16303 Comments

Album Rating: 3.5

Nah, Veil of Maya and Born of Osiris are garbage. This is just decent.

VeilOfOsiris
April 17th 2011


380 Comments

Album Rating: 1.0

not decent, this is really bad. drums suck, guitaring sucks, vocals are garbage, not heavy enough. Audio mixing is laughable at best.

bloodsorcery
April 17th 2011


109 Comments

Album Rating: 4.0 | Sound Off

Way to get it

Crysis
Emeritus
April 17th 2011


17626 Comments

Album Rating: 3.5

bad troll is bad

VeilOfOsiris
April 17th 2011


380 Comments

Album Rating: 1.0

garbage band is garbage.



You have to be logged in to post a comment. Login | Create a Profile





STAFF & CONTRIBUTORS // CONTACT US

Bands: A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z


Site Copyright 2005-2023 Sputnikmusic.com
All Album Reviews Displayed With Permission of Authors | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy