King Crimson
The ConstruKction of Light


1.5
very poor

Review

by Nagrarok USER (219 Reviews)
June 18th, 2010 | 25 replies


Release Date: 2000 | Tracklist

Review Summary: King Crimson is feeling like a machine...

Perhaps, King Crimson has remained the most consistent classic progressive band up to this day. They never became overambitious as Yes did, or disowned their original sound for pop flavour like Genesis. This consistency is only a greater achievement considering their (especially in the 70’s) ever-changing formation. Their fourth album Islands, the last with Peter Sinfield as a lyricist, is the most obvious candidate for worst Crim album, but still had its unique transcendent style despite being poorly improvised. Beat and Three of a Perfect Pair were also quite the disappointment after the superb 80’s comeback Discipline, but really, really, who can rightly claim a single King Crimson record is not worth at least one listen for the seasoned progressive fan?

Those would be the people having had to deal with The ConstruKction of Light.

It was inevitable, of course. Virtually no musical groups can put an end to their career without having put at least one spot of shame in their discography, and King Crimson are no exception to this rule. 11 studio albums, they prevailed, their work ranging from relative lows ‘slightly disappointing’ to as high as ‘an uncanny masterpiece’. The ConstruKction of Light, however, is not just slightly disappointing. It is a incredibly poor record, especially by the standards this compelling group has set throughout their career.

The issue at hand here is that King Crimson has become too caught up in the dense and heavy sound set with THRAK. So much, in fact, that they sound drained of all sorts of emotion and passion: mechanical. Such is the word to best describe The ConstruKction of Light, a record that feels uncomfortably cold and empty. It still has many things Crimson, of course: the piercing riffs varied with lighter tones, continuing tempo changes, the works. The way those are carried out, however, is lifeless. This record lacks a heart, and with the exception of the minor standouts Into the Frying Pan (saved by Belew's charisma) and closer Heaven and Earth (a more ambient piece), the 56-minute ride is like being caught in a bad dream; a bleak world where everything keeps revolving and nothing really feels warm or familiar.

It’s the droning sound and ditto voice of ProzaKc Blues; the machine-like performance of The World's My Oyster Soup Kitchen Floor Wax Museum (yes, that's the actual song title); the headache-inducing experimentation and improvisation of the title track and Part IV of the Larks’ Tongues in Aspic series: they just never seem to end. Everything about the album feels wrong and unapproachable, and nothing really makes sense. You can’t even wonder what Fripp was thinking when he created this mess of unpleasant sounds that weaves a thick and cold musical rail.

The ConstruKction of Light is an unpleasant world to be found in. In some way, King Crimson found a way to create a record that just is a musical nightmare: impossible to sit through, and a horrid, forced experience if you succeed. While the sound is distinctively Crim, the typical sounds of the group’s post-Discipline-era are cold and lifelessly bound together, with the exception of two tracks that don’t work anyway because they’re an inevitable part of a whole. And that whole, to be frank, is rather bad. The most diehard of Crimson fans should still take a firm step away from this album.

The ConstruKction of Light's King Crimson was:

- Robert Fripp ~ Lead Guitar
- Robert Steven ‘Adrian’ Belew ~ Lead Vocals, Rhythm Guitar
- Trey Gunn ~ Warr Guitar
- Lee Patrick 'Pat' Mastelotto ~ Drums


TO BE CONTINUED...



Recent reviews by this author
Genesis Calling All StationsGenesis We Can't Dance
Genesis Invisible TouchGenesis Genesis
Genesis AbacabGenesis Duke
user ratings (465)
3
good
other reviews of this album
TheWalkinDude (2)
Every Prog Rock band worth their salt has a slump, and this is King Crimson's...

BurgerMcJackson (1.5)
An album that sadly caves in to the dark side of progressive rock, with nothing to offer but the sam...



Comments:Add a Comment 
Nagrarok
June 18th 2010


8656 Comments

Album Rating: 2.0

I would do anything but hear this record again.

Mclovin
June 18th 2010


293 Comments


The argument is fairly solid, and you do a fairly good job of maintaining a non-ranting stance. I wouldn't necessarily say it's a good or bad review, imo. I personally enjoyed the album, although I agree that it critically isn't that great.

edit: My biggest problem with the review is that only half of it directly relates to the album.

Nagrarok
June 18th 2010


8656 Comments

Album Rating: 2.0

Yeah, I already knew before posting this is definitely among my lesser write-ups. I already considered removing the first half partly, but I left it there in the end.



Edit: the first paragraphy was really unnesecary alogether, so I got rid of it.

Mclovin
June 18th 2010


293 Comments


I've had the same problem before. If I were you, I'd do some major trimming down on the beginning, and spend a little more time at the end describing the sound in addition to defending the negative rating. But as I said, I wouldn't say it's a bad review, and it's certainly well written.

edit: it's already looking a lottt stronger. I'll pos.

Nagrarok
June 18th 2010


8656 Comments

Album Rating: 2.0

Ah, it looks much better now. The main problem that sometimes comes back in my writing is that I become too caught up talking about the background of the album rather than the album itself. I am relieved to see what a good trim can do. So you see I must watch out not to go too easy on my own writing, even after 140 reviews.

Jethro42
June 18th 2010


18278 Comments


Good review, even if I didn't take time to translate it in french. I'll surely do it later.
I've never 'really' heard of this album, but I guess KC were badly missing Bruford and Levin. ;(

Mclovin
June 18th 2010


293 Comments


I gotcha dude, it happens to us all. The review went from being pretty mediocre to really good reallly quickly.

Nagrarok
June 18th 2010


8656 Comments

Album Rating: 2.0

I've never 'really' heard of this album, but I guess KC were badly missing Bruford and Levin. ;(




Luckily Levin's back now though. I wish Bruford had stayed with them though, he's probably been their best drummer (though I also love Michael Giles).

Jethro42
June 18th 2010


18278 Comments


Yeah, a friend of mine has announced me that Bruford is sadly not anymore in the business, since couple of months.. And I know that Gavin Harisson (Porcupine Tree) took the bar (part time)

Nagrarok
June 18th 2010


8656 Comments

Album Rating: 2.0

Harisson knows his stuff too though, so he's a very worthy replacement (although I think he must be about 20 years younger than the rest of the band, haha).

Jethro42
June 18th 2010


18278 Comments


ahah Yeah, pretty much like the kid playing bass for Rolling Stones (at least 30 years younger than his fellas). And yes, Harisson is such a beast on drums.
Edit: Same for 'The Who's drummer who is much younger than the rest of the band, too.

EVedder27
June 18th 2010


6088 Comments


Nice work Nag, probably won't ever bother with this.

edit: the album title is awwwful with that K

Deviant.
Staff Reviewer
June 18th 2010


32289 Comments


Perhaps, King Crimson has remained to most consistent classic progressive band up to this day.

Check that Nag. Otherwise, stellar review

ShadowRemains
June 18th 2010


27750 Comments


um contributor for this guy, now....

Jethro42
June 19th 2010


18278 Comments


um contributor for this guy, now....

Anndddd I second ShadowRemains =)
Rating KC 1.5. ughh god that bad...
I've heard some excerpts from Lark's Tong in Aspic part IV, on here.
For now I think it's still better than part III. IMO
Nagrarok rooolz!!! 140 quality reviews. It's always a pleasure to read you Cheers, and also
here is a link to obtain my 100 fav classic prock songs:

http://www.sputnikmusic.com/list.php?memberid=280733

You have to be a contributor, Nag. It would be about fucking time, You have to be up there
now, as a contributor...I mean Now. Contributor.

Rhino
June 19th 2010


71 Comments

Album Rating: 3.5

Good review Nag, although obviously by my rating I disagree with your rating. I certainly don't think it's their worst, although I can see why some would. Maybe their worst since Islands. Don't know if you still can, but for a while Adrian Belew had the original acoustic version of I Had A Dream available on his website for free download, the version Fripp wouldn't allow on the record. Also, Heaven and Earth was more a ProjecKt excerpt than a Crim song. My favourite stuff on this record is the instrumental stuff, though.



I agree with the others, you should be a Contributor.

Jethro42
June 19th 2010


18278 Comments


sup Rhino, buddy. I think I am older than you. What do you think

Jethro42
June 19th 2010


18278 Comments


http://www.sputnikmusic.com/list.php?memberid=280733
Welcome to my Prog World.

Nagrarok
June 19th 2010


8656 Comments

Album Rating: 2.0

Nice work Nag, probably won't ever bother with this.



edit: the album title is awwwful with that K




And you shouldn't because I know you would hate this just as much as I do. Stick to their 70's period and Discipline, that's what you'll appreciate most. The K in the titles was a thing Crimson had going on at the time, it doesn't make sense to me either.



Check that Nag.




Thanks for pointing out.



um contributor for this guy, now....




Once again, I am flattered.



I think I've seen that list of yours already Jethro.

Jethro42
June 19th 2010


18278 Comments


You've only seen part I bro. This is the definitive list.



You have to be logged in to post a comment. Login | Create a Profile





STAFF & CONTRIBUTORS // CONTACT US

Bands: A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z


Site Copyright 2005-2023 Sputnikmusic.com
All Album Reviews Displayed With Permission of Authors | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy