The Verve
Urban Hymns


3.5
great

Review

by Med57 EMERITUS
May 1st, 2005 | 73 replies


Release Date: 1997 | Tracklist


The Band: Richard Ashcroft (Vocals/Guitar)
Nick McCabe (Guitar)
Simon Jones (Bass)
Pete Salisbury (Drums)
Simon Tong (Guitar/Keyboards)

Released: 1997(Virgin)

You know how quite frequently there are albums that absolutely everybody knows one or two songs from" Think Blood Sugar Sex Magik by The Red Hot Chili Peppers, or All That You Can’t Leave Behind by U2. These come along quite frequently, and are often maddening to greater fans of the band in question, since suddenly everybody and their parents are singing along to one or two smash hits. It’s not as often though that albums spawn four or so singles, all of which are contenders for the best song of the year. The one that most immediately springs to mind is (What’s The Story) Morning Glory"; Oasis’s 1995 monster album that encapsulated the spirit of Britpop in less than an hour. Slightly less known, but nevertheless a similar phenomenon, is this album, widely regarded as The Verve’s best. Moving away from the psychedelic jams that had been all over their earlier music, this is an album of indie ballads, which at times seems to be not so much music, as Richard Ashcroft personally stabbing the listener through the heart with all the emotion conveyed in his voice. The songs which do this all had a massive amount of success in the UK, making this one of the albums of 1997. However, there’s a problem with this album that on repeated listens becomes very hard to ignore; namely the massive gulf in quality that exists between the outstanding singles, and a lot of the rest of the album, which suffers from Be Here Now syndrome, otherwise known as the need to cut some songs from the album entirely, and take a few minutes off others.

A classic example of this is third song on the album, The Rolling People. Weighing in at 7 minutes long, it’s clearly a step down in quality from the incredible opening double salvo of Bitter Sweet Symphony and Sonnet even within the first four minutes. The thing is though, the band could simply have ended the song at that point, without leaving the listener exposed to what becomes little more than formless jamming, making the song twice as long as it needs to be, and ensuring that a lot of people will skip it after the first few listens. That’s not to say that this is true of every long non-single on this album, because it definitely isn’t. Catching The Butterfly, for example, is a brooding masterpiece of a song, and sounds like it’s coming directly from someone tripping on acid on the floor, with distorted vocals making it reminiscent of a lot of psychedelica from the late 1960s. It’s six and a half minutes long, but nevertheless flows beautifully, as all sorts of effects fly around in the background. It couldn’t sound less similar to the singles, but shows that The Verve weren’t a one trick pony, and remembered a lot of what they had done with their previous music.

Since we’re now three paragraphs in, it’s about time to actually look at these singles, which most people of a certain age in Britain during 1997 will be able to tell you something about. Probably the most well known is Bittersweet Symphony, which features a string sample from The Rolling Stones, and actually meant that The Verve didn’t receive a penny for the song, after an unsuccessful legal battle. It’s a majestic song, with drumming that perfectly complements the string section, along with Ashcroft’s melancholy vocals, singing “You’re a slave to money then you die” in a way beloved of Mancunian vocalists (Morrissey, anyone"). The Drugs Don’t Work is, speaking personally, one of the best songs of the decade, acting as a tribute to Richard Ashcroft’s father, who was dying of cancer at the time of recording. As can easily be imagined, this lends an unbearable air of poignancy to the song, although it also offers a message warning against drug use, fuelling rumours at the time of release about Richard Ashcroft’s possible use of drugs. Like Bitter Sweet Symphony, the use of strings here is superb, although they’re more understated than on the opening song of the album, with the emphasis far more on Ashcroft’s singing. Lucky Man was another smash hit from the album, along with Sonnet, and listening to them both again, something that’s very striking is just how good a lyricist Richard Ashcroft is. Although often self-referential (it’s hard not to believe that even the more oblique lyrics here don’t have some resemblance to his everyday experiences), lines such as “Happiness, more or less, it's just a change in me, something in my liberty” are right up there with most lyrics written by more respected songwriters, showing how unfortunate in a way this band was, releasing albums at the same time as so many other respected British bands, which got far more attention at the time, in spite of often being far inferior.

Something that has been said about The Verve, somewhat unfairly, is that they were the Travis of the 1990s, in that they wrote some great singles, albums that were easy to listen to, but ultimately they won’t be remembered even in 10 years time. The Verve were more than that, and could unquestionably write music that’s frankly far superior to anything that British “easy listening” bands such as Travis and Keane have ever come up with. But even for fans of The Verve, nagging at the back of your mind is the question of whether the detractors of the band are right. Leaving aside the four singles, this album does have some good songs, such as Velvet Morning which is constantly threatening to turn into a U2 stadium anthem, but that’s the problem. These songs stop just short of taking the next step, and it’s actually hugely frustrating, knowing what the band is capable of, seeing them threatening to make a truly brilliant album, and then pulling back at the last minute repeatedly. As the last release by the band before their final split, it’s a maddening legacy, as they were improving with each release, and this album could so easily have been something with which they wrote their name on the list of great bands of the 1990s. Instead though this album eventually settles for something less, damning Richard Ashcroft and his cohorts with far less praise than they might have otherwise got. Sadly, in spite of the four massive singles, that’s all this album really deserves.



Recent reviews by this author
Guns N' Roses Appetite for DestructionHanoi Rocks Two Steps From The Move
Savage Garden AffirmationTool 10,000 Days
Scott Walker TiltThe Pogues Rum Sodomy & the Lash
user ratings (638)
Chart.
4.1
excellent
other reviews of this album
HolidayKirk (4.5)
For Tomorrow: A Guide to Contemporary British Music, 1988-2013 (Part 32)...



Comments:Add a Comment 
Adam Jones is GOD
May 1st 2005


113 Comments


I always wondered if their album material matched up to their singles. Its always frustrating when a band with talent gets bogged down with losing direction on songs.

Keep 'em coming Med

jonno_2010
May 1st 2005


58 Comments


these guyz r class....can blame ppl for liking bittersweet sympony the most...its the song most ppl think of when u mention the verve!

The Ashtray Girl
May 2nd 2005


108 Comments


Completely agree with you.

People keep saying this is one of the best albums ever... I don't get it. Some fantastic songs, yes, but quite a few poor ones too.

Serenity
June 8th 2005


20 Comments


Good review though I have to say that I'm surprised you only gave it 3.5.

It has its weak points, though I think the strength of the good songs, which are amazing (Weeping Willow is my favorite) far outwigh them.

I think this is one of the ten best albums of the decade.

Knoxvillelives
August 17th 2005


342 Comments


Med57: How come your reviews are always so good? You just seem to know ALL the bands you review really well. Bravo. But why do you say songs 'threaten' to become stadium anthems? Is it necessarily a bad thing?

Great album, could have been better.

Med57
Moderator
August 17th 2005


1002 Comments


(A) I love it when people ask me questions like that. :p Seriously though, thanks for that. Personally I really love good stadium rock...I'm one of the few people using this site who seems to actually really like U2, so I definitely like the sound...the problem with some of the songs here is that they sound like they're going to be amazing, and then they just fall flat. That's what drags the rating down.

Lunarfall
February 5th 2006


3178 Comments


This was the second album I have ever bought (Dookie by Green Day was the first). An amazing album that deserves an amazing rating.

Morvit
March 17th 2006


71 Comments

Album Rating: 4.5

i never liked the album cover...itz so bad

les paul al
April 1st 2006


51 Comments

Album Rating: 4.5

the review is two long Med 57 smells saying that there was only four or five good songs is way wrong. What about ` come on`, ` the rolling people` and ` space and time`. three great songs.This Message Edited On 04.01.06

tom79
April 9th 2006


3592 Comments


^ definetly not. The review was great.
Lucky Man a great song and this album is good. Its too bad they couldn't really duplicate the success of this album though.

Digging: Iron Chic - You Can't Stay Here

Krash100
January 4th 2007


37 Comments

Album Rating: 4.5

I don't know what you guys are talking about...



The Verve have been my favorite band for a long time and this album always amazes me from start to finish. The only thing I have a problem with is the lack of harder songs like they had on previous albums. Their b-sides from this era are more experimental and more true to traditional Verve form.



One of these days I'll get around to reviewing "A Storm in Heaven" and "Verve EP"

MassiveAttack
January 4th 2007


2754 Comments

Album Rating: 4.0

I really liked this album. Like Krash said this album does lack a lot harder feel to their songs from previous albums. Yet, this album is great, though I'll agree there are some weak songs I still think the great songs outweigh the weaknesses of the album

Cravinov13
August 6th 2007


3854 Comments


Aside from the first song, this bores the crap out of me.

aguzman
April 13th 2008


62 Comments

Album Rating: 3.0

Just two songs are good. The rest of the album is so boring

Krash100
October 24th 2008


37 Comments

Album Rating: 4.5

I think you're review gets a little too harsh at the end. Now the Verve are back together and this album has since proved not to be their final statement. Their sold out reunion tour and #1 album Forth pretty much shows that people do remember them 10 years on and Urban Hymns cemented them as legends of Brit pop. If anything, their new album reinforces that legacy

slan
September 17th 2009


50 Comments


This is Alt-Country

EVedder27
December 20th 2009


6088 Comments


cause it's a bittersweet symphony...

royscoop19
March 22nd 2010


137 Comments

Album Rating: 3.5

Never ever a classic as some people say. So melancholy and actually boring in parts.

Collis
July 1st 2010


553 Comments

Album Rating: 3.5

Very over-rated, still got a few good songs to bring it up a bit. Prefer 'A Storm In Heaven'.

AliW1993
July 1st 2010


7511 Comments

Album Rating: 3.5

Underrated on sputnik, overrated pretty much everywhere else. This has the potential to be a classic but outside the singles never really delivers.



You have to be logged in to post a comment. Login | Create a Profile





STAFF & CONTRIBUTORS // SITE FORUM // CONTACT US

Bands: A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z


Site Copyright 2005-2017 Sputnikmusic.com
All Album Reviews Displayed With Permission of Authors | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy