King Crimson
Starless and Bible Black


4.0
excellent

Review

by tarkus USER (17 Reviews)
January 6th, 2012 | 35 replies


Release Date: 1974 | Tracklist

Review Summary: Standard '70s Crimson

Starless and Bible Black is an album to love and to not. A stereotypical classic era King Crimson album to the fullest extent, Starless… contains the songs most expected by King Crimson. With straightforward rock tunes, King Crimson’s signature improvisations of the ‘70s, the lengthy progressive behemoth ‘Fracture,’ and not without a ballad found on nearly all Crimson albums, Starless… is what we come to expect as listeners of King Crimson.

The first half of the album is mainly studio compositions, except for the improvisational ‘We’ll Let You Know,’ and fails to disappoint. Songs like ‘The Great Deceiver’ and ‘Lament’ serve a dose of hard rocking King Crimson, and the standout lyrics and vocal focus of ‘The Night Watch’ keep the album interesting, and not being interesting enough is the main fault of the second half of the album. Another element to drag in the listener straightaway are the initial lyrics of the album “health food faggot,” found on ‘The Great Deceiver’.

‘We’ll Let You Know,’ unlike the other improvisations on the album, is straight and to the point, not hesitating to get right into the actual song. ‘Trio’ is a calm ballad that never breaks cadence, and is a key part of the second half of Starless And Bible Black, as well as the entire album. Although ‘Trio’ does not have much going on in the song, it is still attention grabbing with the questing violin of David Cross leading throughout and some interplay with Robert Fripp.

‘Fracture,’ the legendary King Crimson song, the centerpiece of Starless and Bible Black, is an improvisational mixed bag which is slightly disappointing at first but yields a large reward when all is said and done. The style of starting calm then exploding, only to calm back down again and repeat the process until a final explosion is reached is a bit boring in the first section, which is the only downfall of the track, but the magnificence of the rest of the song makes up for it and more. Robert Fripp proclaims this song as the most difficult guitar work he ever played, and this element props up the second half of Starless…, the half which suffers from monotony, and monotony is definitely absent from 'Fracture.'

‘The Mincer’ isn’t really a horrible song, but is a bit boring and monotonous throughout and just as it picks up and starts to get interesting, the song ends. The biggest disappointment on the album is easily the title track, which is just over nine minutes of nonsensical improvisation. ‘Starless and Bible Black’ is similar to ‘Providence’ from the Red, except not nearly as good because it doesn’t go anywhere, and the buildup is hardly a feat, just a more intense and harsh guitar played without much melody at all, and some random percussion which intensifies as well throughout the song, that grows progressively less random as the song advances. Cross and his strings don’t really play a big part, and sort of just play a few notes in the background. The title track would be nearly unlistenable without the legitimate drum beats and bass play during the climax of the song.

Starless and Bible Black is the worst of the Richard Palmer-James era King Crimson albums, but that by no means translates to it being bad, because the other two are fantastic. A few slight downfalls make the album an easy candidate for least likely to be listened to of the trio of albums, but songs like ‘Fracture’ and ‘The Night Watch’ increase the chances of giving this album a listen. Not an outcast among the classic era Crimson albums, Starless and Bible Black contains everything loved about King Crimson, and also all the things that are not.



Recent reviews by this author
Sims More Than EverWild Nothing Nocturne
The West Coast Pop Art Experimental Band A Child's Guide to Good and EvilThe Brian Jonestown Massacre Strung Out In Heaven
Van der Graaf Generator H to He, Who Am the Only OneHawkwind Onward
user ratings (934)
3.9
excellent


Comments:Add a Comment 
tarkus
January 6th 2012


5568 Comments

Album Rating: 4.0

yea

AllGabrielsAreGlass
January 6th 2012


431 Comments


The only problems with this review is that it could do with being more spaced out and easier to read, as it is quite easy to get lost in that massive middle paragraph. But apart from that, good one.

AllGabrielsAreGlass
January 6th 2012


431 Comments


The only album of the Richard Palmer-James era that I still havent listen to yet.

tarkus
January 6th 2012


5568 Comments

Album Rating: 4.0

broke it up idk if for better or worse but whatever



thanks

KjSwantko
January 6th 2012


12082 Comments


decent review, but yeah holy shit break up that 2nd paragraph.

Edit> nvm, you did it as I was reading.

KILL
January 6th 2012


81580 Comments

Album Rating: 3.5

great album

jefflebowski
January 6th 2012


8573 Comments

Album Rating: 4.0

rules hard and is underrated

tarkus
January 6th 2012


5568 Comments

Album Rating: 4.0

truth

greg84
Emeritus
January 6th 2012


7654 Comments

Album Rating: 4.0

Their 4th best, but still awesome.

AllGabrielsAreGlass
January 6th 2012


431 Comments


I think it could use a new paragraph break after "found on ‘The Great Deceiver’." (Sorry, Im being ultra nitpicky here.) But yeah, now you've broken it up it reads better as well, have a pos.

tarkus
January 6th 2012


5568 Comments

Album Rating: 4.0

thanks for the critique and the pos, fixed it up

1drummer
January 7th 2012


330 Comments


The word Stereotypical and King Crimson should never be in the same sentence.

tarkus
January 7th 2012


5568 Comments

Album Rating: 4.0

depends on your preference

JamieTwort
January 7th 2012


26988 Comments


Good review. Album rules.

tarkus
January 7th 2012


5568 Comments

Album Rating: 4.0

i think wake is a little better than this album but i like the sinfield era style better



if you like the hard rock thing they have going then this is probably better than wake for you

tarkus
January 7th 2012


5568 Comments

Album Rating: 4.0

well yeah but its worship of a good album so if its similar its good too



it falters because originality

Jethro42
January 13th 2012


18275 Comments

Album Rating: 4.0

Good review, posd.

tarkus
January 13th 2012


5568 Comments

Album Rating: 4.0

thanks jethro

Jruined
January 13th 2012


1308 Comments

Album Rating: 4.0

I love this album. I love KC. I love twittering birds in the trees, especially as a patient zero bipedal type carrier of avian flu.



See you on the other side of the apocalypse.

tarkus
January 13th 2012


5568 Comments

Album Rating: 4.0

intoxication



You have to be logged in to post a comment. Login | Create a Profile





STAFF & CONTRIBUTORS // CONTACT US

Bands: A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z


Site Copyright 2005-2023 Sputnikmusic.com
All Album Reviews Displayed With Permission of Authors | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy