Album Rating: 4.0
didnt have a review and i wanted to bump so i solved the issue myself.
anyways sweet album.
|
| |
Album Rating: 3.5
Gotta hear this asap.
|
| |
Album Rating: 4.0
Thank you for your sacrifice.
Gud jam.
|
| |
Album Rating: 3.0
a quick review was just what I needed
need to hear this now, appreciate it
|
| |
Album Rating: 3.0
never really loved this one but it's a reasonably solid album
|
| |
norway good
|
| |
new album rules btw!
|
| |
Album Rating: 3.0
listened to it once and made me wish it was disharmonic orchestra
its all right, kind of has a jank, punk edge that I personally dont vibe with
|
| |
Album Rating: 4.0
apparently the new album is unreleased tracks from 1992. half of them are songs that ended up on this album.
|
| |
That's neat. the remastering is really great; had no idea they were thirty-year-old tracks.
|
| |
Album Rating: 4.0
yeah me neither but I was jamming and I was like “damn I’ve heard all these tracks before” lol.
still cool though and there’s a couple new ones.
|
| |
i went through both tracklists and it seems like the original In Distortion is the only old track not copied to the new album and the new track Maltreated Mind Makes Man Manic isn't a new remaster from this album. I like the new version more either way tho, those new drums have so much more power in the mix now.
|
| |
The only common trait of the new album and ...In Pains is that both song collections were recorded in the early '90s, but the first collection was shelved, probably because it was too experimental for the time...
|
| |
how are they experimental they're like the same songs?
|
| |
In a review of the album, it said that the songs of the new album were unfinished and in raw form, when …In Pains was released.
I compared track lists of both albums and they are different in terms of song names, and number of songs.
If both track lists refer to the same songs, why change their names afterwards?
|
| |
Album Rating: 4.0
idk but I’ve listened to this album quite a lot and i can verify that 70% of the tracks are the same between the two.
which again isn’t a problem, the new one is advertised as an “unreleased album” so they probably recorded it and shelved it for what ended up as in pains. quite a common occurrence back then.
|
| |
Album Rating: 3.5
About to jam this now.
|
| |
@Hyperion1001
Havent't listened to …In Pains, I plan to do so sooner than later, but I don't think it has the magnitude of Voivod/Virus references that the new album has for sure.
The drumming, in particular, is so volatile, while some guitars transmit Dimension Hatross dissonance.
|
| |
Album Rating: 4.0
you’d be surprised. the reason I reviewed this one is cause it’s one of my fav weirdo 90’s dm albums.
the biggest difference is this one is produced in a much more typical Scott burns style where as the new one has a lot more organic and punky tones.
I’d imagine that might be one of the reasons those recordings were shelved.
|
| |
I just listened to this, and yeah, there are only a couple (tops!) of those weird chords that are more prevalent in the new album.
If I were to rate this; if Death's Human is a 5 for progressive/desth metal, this sounded to me in between 3-3.5 and closer to a 3 (listening to the debut right now, and to my ears, it sounds way superior!).
-- the new one has a lot more organic and punky tones.
you just described the production in Voivod's Dimension Hatross ;-)
|
| |
|
|
