">
 

Cianide
The Dying Truth


1.5
very poor

Review

by Dethtrasher USER (232 Reviews)
August 15th, 2006 | 34 replies


Release Date: 1992 | Tracklist


HISTORY
They come from Chicago, they play old-school death-metal in very slow tempos and is probably one of the oldest death-metal bands from Chicago. This band is called Cianide, formed in 1998, they came to the world with some of the heaviest and slowest death-metal around. Their music was between standing on the edge of death-metal and doom-metal, their music was very heavy, dense, brutal and slow. And with the vocalist's deep and slow growling made the band seem even more gloomy and spooky.

ALBUM INFORMATION
This album is their first album and it is called ''The Dying Truth''. The material in this album can only be described in one word: slow, every song is sluggish, deppressing, gloomy and very heavy. The only exception is the faster Human Cesspool, this is the only song with a faster pace than the other songs. The rest of the songs are fast as a snail, they are very slow in other words. The vocals are deep and slow growling, there is not much variety in the vocals which make them very boring and uninteresting. The overall sound production sounds very dense and thick, there are not many clean moments (there is basically no clean moments on this album). The lyrics is typical death-metal stuff, the band focus their lyrics towards dark themes such as war, violence, bad attitude and so on.

BAND MEMBERS
This album was performed by a small trio, we start with vocalist and bassist Mike Perun. This must be the slowest growlings I have heard, he delivers growlings in very a deep, dark and dense format. There are no signs of variety in the vocals, the chance of getting bored by them is very high. And his bass, what about it? The bass is eqully as heavy and dense as the guitars, the only clear tunes you can hear from the bass in only one song, otherwise there are no standouts or special sections with the bass as ''front-instrument''. Scott Carroll is the guitarist in this blury death-band, I can't admit that this performace was great or good. These guitars were bad, the guitar work was quite ''single-tracked'' in all the songs, the riffs/shredds were anything else but catchy. None of the songs grabbed my and thats because of the dull and slow guitar work, the variety among the poor structured riffs was also bad. Jeff Kabella was the drummer in this album, his performance was equally as poor as the other members. The drumming was very low-tech drumming, the patterns were boring, slow and very uncatchy. The drums maybe was a bit heavy but that is the only good thing I can say about the drum performance.

MY THOUGHTS ABOUT THIS ALBUM
Man, this album is so hard to judge! Just kidding, this was one of the most uninteresting death-metal bands I have ever heard! I will be totally honest with you, there was nothing that I can call enjoying in this album. The whole album was just as interesting as watching a stone trying to beat the c**p out of a shovel. One reason why I didn't like this album was the sluggish tempos, there was oly one song that had a faster tempo than the other songs but it didn't make that song better than the rest. Some of the songs were increasing in speed but not much, none of the songs had that little thing called catchy. Another thing that bugged me was the ultra-slow growling, death-growls are though a classic feature in the death-metal genre but this was just so dull, boring and even more boring.

MY CONCLUSION
As you can see this review wasen't written with big enthusiasm, I just saw this band on the internet and I thought that I could check them out, now I realize that this was just a huge waste of time. This was the most uninteresting death-metal band I have heard yet, but if I never took myself time to look at this I would maybe miss something special. If I should recommend this album to someone it would be serious death-metal fans, though I think there are some fans out there who would give this one a chance. But I suggest that you listen to at least one or two songs before you get this album. I will not recommend any of these songs to be honest, get the whole thing if you like death or doom-metal or you can just leave this alone. I'm sorry if this review seemed uninspired but I did my best on this one and I hope I have given some guidance to you people.

This album will be given a 1.5/5 because of its sluggish and uninteresting overall material



Recent reviews by this author
Opeth DamnationFleshcrawl Made of Flesh
Sear Lamentations of DestructionTormented Rotten Death
War (SWE, Black Metal) We Are...Total WarCrucified Barbara Til Death Do Us Party
user ratings (51)
3.9
excellent
other reviews of this album
ffs (4)
...



Comments:Add a Comment 
south_of_heaven 11
August 15th 2006


5611 Comments


Not quite as good as your other reviews, but still informative. I guess this one is going on the list of albums I hope I don't hear...

Thor
August 15th 2006


10354 Comments


Only 3 left! Great work, too. Before reading this, I got a good laugh out of the band's name.

I won't be looking into this one.

Dethtrasher
August 15th 2006


2211 Comments

Album Rating: 1.0

I guess that you shouldn't judge a band just because of one album but this was C.R.A.P. in my ears. Its hard to get a good review when you don't like the material =/

Thor
August 15th 2006


10354 Comments


I can agree with you on that, some of my crappier reviews are on the albums I hate.

south_of_heaven 11
August 15th 2006


5611 Comments


I agree, it's really hard to review albums you don't like. The descriptions you want to give for songs are hard to explain, and usually turn out to just be "Man, this song sucks".

Thor
August 15th 2006


10354 Comments


Haha, that's how my reviews at the end always end up. I tried to do my best on my review of Korn's Take a Look in the Mirror and I think that one turned out ok, but my Hammerfall review is pretty lame.

metallicaman8
August 15th 2006


4677 Comments


The format's getting old.

...still it's rather astounding how speedily you can write reviews.

Cravinov13
August 15th 2006


3854 Comments


I like this format though...

This band is worse then Six Feet Under in the death metal realm.

Dethtrasher
August 15th 2006


2211 Comments

Album Rating: 1.0

I thought that you liked these guys Crav. Just by looking at your favorite bands you might think that you have listen to everything in metal. (almost though)

Freezing Moon
August 15th 2006


63 Comments


You guys are all retarded, this is actually quite good. It's old-school death metal that gets it done by being slow and crushing. I like the vocals as well.

You probably all like Dying Fetus and Devourment though, so this should be expected.

This band is worse then Six Feet Under in the death metal realm.

You've got to be kidding me. That is the most ridiculous thing I've ever heard.This Message Edited On 08.15.06

Cravinov13
August 15th 2006


3854 Comments


I've heard a lot of metal, but I don't like this band one bit.

Freezing Moon
August 15th 2006


63 Comments


Judging by your "favorite bands" list, I'm not suprised at all.

ninjamonkey
August 15th 2006


6 Comments

Album Rating: 5.0

I had to give this an inflated rating just to make up for all the bad ratings it's gotten. This album is awesome death/doom. It is meant to be a slower tempo and not technical.



It's like giving Mozart a low rating b/c it doesn't have blast beats.

Cravinov13
August 15th 2006


3854 Comments


I gave it a low rating cause itdoesn't appeal to me like most death/ doom metal does.

TheDevilsOwn
August 15th 2006


91 Comments

Album Rating: 2.5

Nice review. This band is pretty descent, but not that bad. This is not a good album of theres to get into though.

Dethtrasher
August 16th 2006


2211 Comments

Album Rating: 1.0

As I said before, yes it wrong to judge a band by just listen to one album. But the first one is the one that makes the first impression. This was my first doom/death experience and I found it horrible.

Freezing Moon
August 16th 2006


63 Comments


Maybe if you did less reviewing and more concentrated listening you'd appreciate it more and take time to get to know it past your first impression while listening for things you think would make a good review.

bmaos
October 23rd 2006


1 Comments

Album Rating: 5.0

this is a fucking great album and band .. why do you review death metal albums when you listen to crap like in your profile. Leave death metal reviews to people who know it

Dethtrasher
October 23rd 2006


2211 Comments

Album Rating: 1.0

I review whatever I wan't, I will never listen to doom/death after this. Even I would listen to this several times a day, weeks, months, or years my opinion wouldn't change.

Mikesn
Emeritus
October 23rd 2006


3707 Comments


Yes, Deth obviously doesn't know what he's talking about just because he gave it a low grade. How did you ever come up with brilliant reasoning such as that?


Its hard to get a good review when you don't like the material =/

Heh, I know how that feels. But apparently they turn out okay, so yay. Also, the monster on the cover looks like the thing on Iron Maiden's Live at Donnington...This Message Edited On 10.23.06



You have to be logged in to post a comment. Login | Create a Profile





STAFF & CONTRIBUTORS // CONTACT US

Bands: A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z


Site Copyright 2005-2023 Sputnikmusic.com
All Album Reviews Displayed With Permission of Authors | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy