Album Rating: 0.5
Album stream (for expert use only): https://open.spotify.com/album/2XS5McKf3zdJWpcZ4OkZPZ
"I hate all of you" -Squidward probably
|
| |
Album Rating: 2.0
I want to meme
|
| |
Album Rating: 3.0
unbelievable really
|
| |
Album Rating: 3.5
...Now tell us how you really feel.
|
| |
Album Rating: 0.5
it sucks
|
| |
Album Rating: 1.5
I can fuck with this
|
| |
Your review doesn't mention a single song by name. It doesn't even refer to one specific moment that you took issue with. You're just throwing out generalizations and making sweeping claims without doing any of the leg work to back them up. The album may be as bad as you suggest (I haven't listened to it and don't plan to), but this is not an effective review.
|
| |
Album Rating: 0.5
i'm just speaking the harsh reality (and having fun while doing it)
|
| |
Your review would be much more effective at conveying that harsh reality if you used examples to support your claims. You can’t conclude that “nothing is listenable” without identifying a single song or moment that you didn’t like. There is nothing in this review that suggests you even listened to the album.
|
| |
Album Rating: 3.5
Everything about 10000 gecs is a valuable lesson on how not to make music, how not to meme, and how to successfully communicate to the lowest common denominator and get away with it by making The 1975-tier garbage appeal to idiotic pseudo-mainstream hipsters who slam pop music for simply existing.
|
| |
Album Rating: 2.5
I would say take yourself semi-seriously on a music journalism site when posting a music review but this is sputnik
but yeah I agree with Ebola. You only spend a couple of sentences referencing the actual music, also you never explain why they sound like Brokencyde. This reads like more of an attack on the band / their style than the actual music on the album, which I am sure I will agree is shite after I listen to it
|
| |
Album Rating: 3.0
nothing IS listenable
noBTHIS IS entertaining
Nothing IS original
yes!!!
spite is bendy
|
| |
Album Rating: 0.5
"I would say take yourself semi-seriously on a music journalism site"
If they (allegedly) dont take themselves semi-seriously then why should I
|
| |
Album Rating: 2.5
because you're the critic, you should want people to take your writing seriously (or else who is going to read your work?). If you have a harsh take, be ready to defend that take. This is hardly a defense
|
| |
Album Rating: 3.1
first sentence of that second para would make for a great parting shot in a real review
|
| |
Album Rating: 3.0
Gonna agree with the OP. I post my reviews because it’s fun, i don’t give a fuck about if my reviews are professional and formal. It’s a hobby and we aren’t the league of album critics, let people write wacky over the top reviews if they want. Adds to the fun, if anything was a dry wall of text (which I am very guilty of), then this place would be boring
|
| |
Album Rating: 3.0
the nature of the hobby (be honest) begets knowledge of degrees of humor and the ways in which discursive manipulation of it differentiates itself from banal to fun. the issue in question has more to do with public imagination than with "formality" imo
|
| |
Album Rating: 2.0
good rev
|
| |
Album Rating: 3.0
Not gonna lie homie, that was all just white noise.
|
| |
You should absolutely have fun with this hobby! But it’s flat out wrong to suggest that having fun and producing quality writing are mutually exclusive. Asking OP to cite a few examples to support their extreme point of view is not demanding “a dry wall of text,” and it’s dishonest to suggest otherwise. You don’t have to write formally to write effectively.
|
| |
|
|
