R.E.M.
Out of Time


5.0
classic

Review

by SpiridonOrlovschi USER (33 Reviews)
November 1st, 2022 | 10 replies


Release Date: 1991 | Tracklist

Review Summary: REM's most diverse album shows a still relevant fusion between chaos and harmony, between incoherence and sheer splendour.

In the moment of the release, "Out Of Time" was considered unanimously a great album. Some magazines declared it a masterwork. With the passing of time, the opinions became mixed, with the listeners recognizing in "Out of Time" the first moment when REM really felt uninspired and their music sounded dull and dusty. The album is too mainstream to be appreciated by college rock fans and too alembicated to be tasted by pop enthusiasts. Also, it misses the contemporary audience, the public recognizing in it a record with only two memorable songs surrounded by just pretty moments.

I think "Out of Time" deserves a better fate and reappraisal. At continuous listens, the chaotic mix between commerciality and experiment becomes the vehicle for one of the most varied statements of the nineties. Like a sunny variant of "Green", "Out Of Time" may be one of the strangest albums from the mainstream wave of alternative rock. A mix between dad rock, sentimental ballads, depressive moments, a questionable instrumental song and a spoken track, "Out Of Time" feels like the product of a band that was rushed to make another album to fulfil the magnificent fusion between commercial and personal released by "Green". Instead of focusing on dizzy soundscapes like its predecessor did, REM created this mix between chaos and pure pop mastery, enriching the entire creation with a decisive essence..

The album isn’t well organized, the order of the tracks feeling like a random mix. The first moment (and the worst due to an uninspired rap inclusion) continues with "Losing My Religion", whose melancholic character is followed by the depressive "Low". The upbeat tone of the beginning contrasts in a strident way with "Losing My Religion" and the hermetic "Low" defies the musical dynamism in favour of a sinking into depression. This order encountered all over the album’s course doesn’t fit with the status of a great creation, but REM’s songwriting and conception destroys this impression. What would have been disastrous for the majority of bands metamorphoses into a beautiful meditation. This bipolar tracklist makes the album more daring than any other REM record until "Monster", giving the entire sound an experimental stamp.

Also, the uncanonical construction becomes more and more evident with "Near Wild Heaven," which lights up the darkness expressed by "Low." From here, the work’s dissonant character is more apparent, unfolding in moments which oscillate between pop sensibility and country folk accents. Although "Endgame" is an uninspired instrumental that fails to elicit emotions and feelings, it serves as an excellent prelude to "Shiny Happy People". Even if "Shiny Happy People" isn’t considered among the best songs of REM’s career, its construction is truly outstanding. Without a memorable character, an engaging melodic line and Kate Middleton’s vocal accompaniment, the song wouldn’t be so massively played on almost every famous radio station and it wouldn't have raised so many views on Youtube.

"Belong" forms a beautiful exercise in atmospheric ambiguity, being a mysterious passage to the melancholic side constituted by "Half A World Away", "Texarkana" and "Country Feedback". These songs form the main reasons that make REM’s music so unforgettable: the sadness punctuated by emotional harmonies, the lush sentiment of lost and the regretful retrospection. They feel like folk-infused renditions of the alternative substance from "Green", this section creating a bridge between the previous work and the present orientation. "Me In Honey" summarizes the music’s strong points. The calm, the melancholy, the happiness, and, again, Kate Middleton’s voice, prove the record’s expressive beauty.

Being both accessible and experimental, "Out Of Time" gives a magnificent spectacle of emotional alternative rock nuances that will find an impressive extrapolation on "Automatic For The People", encompassing a sentimental multivalence. We have tenderness and depression, country and indie rock, disaster and construction, and, finally, a powerful album with a powerful voice. Feeling like a masterwork made in a short time (although the pause between "Green" and "Out Of Time" is nearly three years), the album presents something from all REM’s creative phases, thrown into an almost illogical mix, which amplifies the imperfect passion of a heartfelt melody.



Recent reviews by this author
The The Soul MiningTerry Riley A Rainbow In Curved Air
Bob Dylan Shadow KingdomThe Kinks The Village Green Preservation Society
Beastie Boys Ill CommunicationThe Rolling Stones Between the Buttons
user ratings (821)
3.6
great
other reviews of this album
Jack Fraser (3.5)
It’s crazy what you could’ve had....

Zebra (2.5)
...



Comments:Add a Comment 
e210013
November 1st 2022


6352 Comments

Album Rating: 4.0

This is really a very good album for what I can remember. I don't check it for centuries. Nice writing. I liked to read it, really. Pos.

fogza
November 2nd 2022


10224 Comments

Album Rating: 4.0

"They feel like folk-infused renditions of the alternative substance from "Automatic For The People", this section creating a bridge between the previous work and the present orientation"

"the moment of REM’s fall from the graces of the emotional alternative-rock that crowned "Automatic For The People"

"Out Of Time" feels like the product of a band that was rushed to make another album to pair with "Automatic for The People"."

I'm finding this review a little confusing, it's almost like you're saying out of time was released after automatic for the people?

SpiridonOrlovschi
November 2nd 2022


8 Comments

Album Rating: 5.0

Yes, that was my mistake. I mistook "Automatic For The People" for "Green" because of some strange correlation. I corrected the review anyway. Thanks for the observation.

fogza
November 2nd 2022


10224 Comments

Album Rating: 4.0

No problem, I'm not sure I really agree with this review (I don't really get the angle that this album was rushed or a product of pressure), but nice to see OOT get some love.

Minortimbo12
November 2nd 2022


1648 Comments


REM is overrated

kildare
November 2nd 2022


524 Comments


I don't know if I agree either, but I don't consider myself a fan (I only really love maybe fifteen or so tracks by the band and don't listen to the rest), so I can't really weigh in on quality. But I can definitely BELIEVE that it contains experimentation, because "Automatic For The People" strikes me as a change in style from their earlier stuff.

To my casually-listening ears it doesn't sound like R.E.M. were shiny happy artists when they made Automatic. Maybe this album represented a leaving-behind of "Radio Free Europe" and "Stand," and a shift to the more melancholy sound of "Low"?

Am I off base in saying they left behind the tracks with "country and indie rock, disaster and construction," and focused on the "depression" and "melancholy" sounds on OOT?

fogza
November 2nd 2022


10224 Comments

Album Rating: 4.0

OOT's biggest departure is that it focuses more on the personal and less on the political. Stipe even said in the documentary on the recording of it that he always avoided writing love songs and OOT marked the point when he was willing to go there

claygurnz
November 2nd 2022


7790 Comments

Album Rating: 3.5

Love this band and about half this album. It's not like this is a bad album by any stretch, but they have so many better ones and a few of the songs here don't really work imo.

fogza
November 2nd 2022


10224 Comments

Album Rating: 4.0

While I'd say country feedback is probably one of the most devastating songs in their catalogue, I'd don't think I'd call OOT overtly depressing as a whole

kildare
November 2nd 2022


524 Comments


"Avoided writing love songs and OOT marked the point when he was willing to go there."

Thanks. That clears up some stuff that I thought about years ago but never discussed with a genuine R.E.M. fan. I was hanging out with new acquaintances when Automatic came out, acquaintances with much wider tastes than mine, and I LOVED Losing My Religion at a party with them, and I'd decided to give REM a try and start with the new album (Automatic). But it was, man, it was really mellow and heartfelt and sad and I wasn't ready for it. None of my friends really appreciated it either. It grew on me but it took a couple years of musical maturing. And I agree that a cursory perusal of OOT has a more upbeat flavor, a little closer to Eponymous, the only other one that, along with Automatic, I feel entitled to rate.

But I don't want to rate them, because they'll only be "Good", and I know that to FANS they're a lot better than just "Good." Fans are gonna be like "What do you mean, GOOD? PULL YOUR HEAD OUT! THEY'RE CLASSIC!" And I know they're classic, but I just tend...to put in something else. It's kind of a paradox on Sputnik: We all have the right to rate something, but some true fans of a given band would probably like to restrict the vote to only fans. But if you guys at Sputnikmusic restricted people like me from voting, we'd never see what the non-fans at large think about it.

Ah...the tribulations of democracy.



You have to be logged in to post a comment. Login | Create a Profile





STAFF & CONTRIBUTORS // CONTACT US

Bands: A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z


Site Copyright 2005-2023 Sputnikmusic.com
All Album Reviews Displayed With Permission of Authors | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy