Blitzkrieg
A Time Of Changes


2.5
average

Review

by Itsonlyme USER (12 Reviews)
December 22nd, 2018 | 9 replies


Release Date: 1985 | Tracklist

Review Summary: Dinner tonight is: a heated up nice hodgepodge of Maiden, Priest, New Wave and Saxon, but... served a bit too late

In 1984 the restive vocalist Brian Ross re-established the once promising NWOBHM representatives Blitzkrieg, recruiting some old names as new members (notably from groups associated with Wallsend's Neat Records) to reanimate the evanished band. Main reason and aim was to release the debut album that shipwrecked at the end of 1981. And thus the album considered dead eventually showed up under the title A Time of Changes in 1985. And times surely had changed! The striking cover art and angular band logo were designed by Nigel Ballard, to me a big unknown, but I must admit that his rendering of the Great Bird of Armageddon is convincing and suitable for a delayed NWOBHM album. And a great improvement compared to the awkward drawing featuring their first single 'Buried Alive'. The fact that this cd emerged in 1985 in stead of 1982 is of decisive importance and a main factor of appreciation, and one of the reasons why it's release went relatively unobserved. Imagine this traditional metal album in a sea of modern 'classic' metal and thrash washing up: Anthrax, Iron Maiden, Helloween, Megadeth, Exodus, Celtic Frost: anonymously it will go under and drown .

Although it contains some good, energetic songs and reveals occasionally confidence, the album as a whole never is a high flyer. It seems to lack cohesiveness and character, demonstrating some mediocre or anaemic compositions, lacking passion or boldness. The scrape together character of the album also is partly responsible for the impression of imbalance and turmoil that I sense. The album breathes a formulaic, hurried atmosphere leaving no opportunity for surprise. The production is reasonable, although there is a lot of echo and reverb especially on the vocals. Sometimes they got lost in a mush. Bass is audible (ok!), and the drums also (to my regret!). O, these drums spoil the atmosphere of the album: they sound like kettels and are way too simplistic and annoying. Productionwise it is not a bad album, but I prefer the raw and crude production of the 1981 single.

Although Blitzkrieg 1985 really fits in the heavy metal genre, relying on early NWOBHM acts, the songs seem to lack the passion and conviction, the attitude that belong to it. Take for example the title track or Vikings, they tend to become nagging songs, leaning against New Wave or Glam Rock. The 'Shout-shout'-refrain especially reminds me of the Tears for Fears eponymous song, and although this is a good song in it's own right, it's not a fitting metal song. The title track, a spiced up glam rock song, nice but aimless, also does not convince me, even though it is one of the most characteristic songs by the band. The vocals of Brian Ross are worth highlighting in particular here, for they seem dividing. I am part of the critics group. His singing style is quite monotonous, pale and static, in spite of his Halfordesque high pitched swipes his voice better fits a New Wave band. Others regard him as a vocalist of importance, but he is not one of my favourites. The guitar tandem Jim Sirotto and Mick Proctor on the other hand is solid and robust, dueling in the well known Thin Lizzy and Judas priest tradition, but never really explosive.

The album contains 8 songs, all worthwhile in their own way but not one exceptional or special. Inferno is an energetic song that bursts in after the obligatory synth intro Ragnarok. Blitzkrieg is the band's most famous tune, thanks to Metallica's cover version. It's a nice metal song recycling Focus'main riff from te song Hocus Pocus. Pull the Trigger is a song written for Satan, Ross's other brainchild and consists of an up tempo metal track with double bass drumming. The other songs are stuck in good intentions and never rise above mediocrity. Maybe A Time of Changes would have been a great release back in 1982, with a better production and the right intention. In this respect Court in the Act (1983) provides a way better example of inspired, dynamic heavy metal composed in this period.



Recent reviews by this author
Michael Schenker Group MSGStatus Quo Live!
Vengeance (NL) ArabiaAlcatrazz No Parole from Rock 'n' Roll
Demon The Unexpected GuestHelloween Pink Bubbles Go Ape
user ratings (28)
Chart.
3.9
excellent
recommended by reviewer
Satan Court in the Act
Raven Wiped Out


Comments:Add a Comment 
Voivod
Staff Reviewer
December 22nd 2018


8398 Comments


Time is not important for good music to arrive.

Digging: Meridian (CHE) - The Seventh Sun

BallsToTheWall
December 22nd 2018


49709 Comments


This album is cash af!

Digging: Black Sabbath - Headless Cross

Thalassic
December 22nd 2018


3118 Comments

Album Rating: 4.5

Oh damn, pos for writing a review anyway!

One of the greatest NWOBHM records imo.

Itsonlyme
December 22nd 2018


115 Comments

Album Rating: 2.5

Did not want to be negative but had to be honest. And I Love nwobhm.

Thalassic
December 22nd 2018


3118 Comments

Album Rating: 4.5

Incorrect score and opinion; still a solid review.

Casavir
December 23rd 2018


3638 Comments

Album Rating: 4.0

Definitely not a 2.5.

MrSirLordGentleman
December 23rd 2018


12639 Comments


Nice to see that this got a review, and a well written one but yeah, this is at least a 3.5, at least

lostforwords
December 25th 2018


451 Comments


Court in the Act IS better, but this one deserves so much more than a 2.5. I' m not sure I find the whole "too late" idea reasonable enough to dismiss this album. As far as I'm concerned, a good record is a good record.

Itsonlyme
December 26th 2018


115 Comments

Album Rating: 2.5

A, this is a nice discussion. Thanks for all the comments. Yes, I think the moment of release matters. Does anyone here think Metallica's Kill 'em All would have the same impact and appraisal when they had launched the album in 1988? Or 2016? Venom's Black Metal released in 2003, how is that? I agree that it can not determine the quality of the music. But context, history, moment, yes they do matter. Furthermore: I don't dismiss the album, but regret it is not so good as I expected. The vocals are not so strong, the concept not a surprise, the drummer is boring and the album lacks energy. And this, gentlemen, is my opinion.



You have to be logged in to post a comment. Login | Create a Profile





STAFF & CONTRIBUTORS // SITE FORUM // CONTACT US

Bands: A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z


Site Copyright 2005-2017 Sputnikmusic.com
All Album Reviews Displayed With Permission of Authors | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy