Sophie
Oil of Every Pearl's Un-Insides


2.0
poor

Review

by Winesburgohio CONTRIBUTOR (35 Reviews)
August 9th, 2018 | 227 replies


Release Date: 2018 | Tracklist

Review Summary: high concept low dividends all ambition no fun

The album begins. It begins before "It's O.K. to Cry" - a glitter bomb cunningly wearing the trousers of a song - glisters it's way into a luculent vocal performance. It begins before we see the album cover: Sophie looking uncomfortable in an outfit that would surely result in a ferocious lip sink for your life performance. It begins at the album title: "oil of every pearl's un-insides". Oil of" I love. With you so far girl. Every Pearl's un" uhh. Every pearlsons" Insides is abundantly clear. Somehow, never mind the awkward l tripping the wordplay, we're supposed to be left with "I love every person's insides". As an act of wordplay it's convoluted, tenuous, ambitious and, worst of all, laboured. For an artist who succeeded in deconstructing intonations, complicating the ubiquitous assurances of pop with distortion and dis-rhythmic patter, it's an inauspicious start that acts a synecdoche of the album: laborious conceptual hauteur has been foregrounded over pop immediacy.

That, for me, is why this album just doesn't work. I can't comment on "It's Okay to Cry" other than to say I admire it tremendously as a coming-out statement much more than I enjoy it, though I don't particularly like tears being conflated with femininity for the umpteenth time. I can't comment on the strength that many Trans and Queer individuals have found through this album (there are some very moving essays on tinymixtapes, and in an interview with teen vogue, Sophie said she wanted to remove the veil and join the discussion more candidly and all power to her). I can comment that to these ears Sophie has dispensed with the charm and nuance that marked her early work, a halcyon time when we waited on tenterhooks to see what she would do next; I can say that Lemonade and Hard were my go-to tracks when I was asked to put something on at parties; I can say that that Product beguiled on it's release, a glorious melange of naivety, wisdom, pop nous, intriguing physical texture and fun.

Oil, by contrast, is charmless: a cold, clinical exercise in territory -- and this is important -- that Sophie charted anyway. The joys of her early work evidenced everything she's being acclaimed for here: problemetizing the distinction between male and female dimensions of pop, integrating mechanical and discordant elements to interfere with tropes and push the boundaries of what pop, fundamentally, could do and what could be assimilated into them, without losing the sheer joy, even euphoria, generated by the song-writing. One upon a time, she could do this with complexity and nuance, without falling the prey to the demand for the abject, for public espousal of ideology, straddling blurred lines with the grace of an Olympic gymnast. And I mean Product, when it was released, came in butt-plug format (seriously). It was future-thinking but also harked back to a time where sexuality, gender, alienation and cultural expansion were being explored in the early days of Disco.

And people read between the lines. Bipp played in gay clubs to roars of approval. Queer DJ's integrated either Vyzee or, weirdly, L.O.V.E. into their sets.

The difference being now that Sophie thrusts the formal innovation and weirdness in your face; there's a suffocating lack of ambiguity; there is cleverness on display, but it's so obvious it paradoxically denies any possibility of gravitas, and it retreads the same territory she's already charted but in a less interesting, more clinical way. There are traces of her old brilliance. "Faceshopping" combines the pots, pans and scraping knives textures with a gorgeously intimate vocal (who needs a vulva when you've got that uvula girl) and my favourite, "It's Not Okay", is terrifying, giddy and thrilling all at once, though one wonders why it's so short and the cheaply paulstretched "Infatuation" and "Pretending" go on interminably, unable to sustain the weight of the fairly basic ideas that carry them.

Other tracks have excellent ideas that are poorly-developed or mixed in order to sound as bizarre as possible. Ponyboy has too much going on simultaneously, mixed in such a way that the cacophony yields no pleasure or depth; Immaterial not enough; and I mean I can do cheese, and I can do corn, but Whole New World's combining of the two is a difficult to stomach sarnie. There's no denying the ambition on display here: the problem is that the ambition is to make what was already evident on her early work manifest, at the expense of joy, or the ***-eating grin that smears one's face during the J-Pop section of Lemonade, or the warmth of the production. I can't help but feel condescended to, and feel that Sophie has broken a cardinal law of giving the listener room to interpret, to parse, to decipher for themselves.

And so again we turn to I love every pearlsons insides: a thematic purpose, a conceit, weighed down by a veritable tonnage of not quite having the mixing or the equalizers to pull it off. A labour of love, sure, but this isn't reciprocal, it's didactic. By embellishing all that made her so brilliant in the first place, she has forfeited those same qualities. I once loved the kinetic and animated quality of her music; after seeing her pull the strings with trained precision, the magic is ruined, the illusion revealed, the carnival over.

The albums ends, as it must, a whole new world, sputtering out, a whole new world, signifying the end of an old one. The new world is one where everything must be abject, finger-pointingly direct, hands wrung at infelicities. The world that died was bubblegum bass, clever, generous, vibrant. It deserved a bang. It got a whimper.



Recent reviews by this author
Dean Blunt Soul on FireJimmy Eat World Clarity
Yves Tumor Safe in the Hands of LoveScott Walker Tilt
Kanye West yeGrouper Grid of Points
user ratings (320)
Chart.
3.7
great
other reviews of this album
Kirk Bowman (4.5)
messy beauty...

Finn Baker (4)
Critique on the dehumanization of society, vulgar sex acts, and spacey epics all contained within on...

SherlockChris9021 (4.5)
A whole new world to the pop music scene....

related reviews

Lemonade/Hard


Comments:Add a Comment 
hal1ax
August 9th 2018


11702 Comments

Album Rating: 2.5

"The difference being now that Sophie thrusts the formal innovation and weirdness in your face; there's a suffocating lack of ambiguity; there is cleverness on display, but it's so obvious it paradoxically denies any possibility of gravitas, and it retreads the same territory she's already charted but in a less interesting, more clinical way."



agreed ahrd

Gyromania
August 9th 2018


25915 Comments

Album Rating: 4.5

No

Cygnatti
August 9th 2018


32634 Comments

Album Rating: 3.0

yes

Gyromania
August 9th 2018


25915 Comments

Album Rating: 4.5

I like you wines but this review comes across kind of flowery and obligatorily contrarian. Not to mention lots of small grammatical errors like "it's way". I'm all for divergent opinions, but this review doesn't sell me on your premise

Astral Abortis
August 9th 2018


6736 Comments


"The album begins. It begins before "It's O.K. to Cry" - a glitter bomb cunningly wearing the trousers of a song - glisters it's way into a luculent vocal performance."

holy poor sentence construction

Astral Abortis
August 9th 2018


6736 Comments


This may be the worst review I've ever read. I couldn't even get to the end of the first paragraph and none of it made a lick of sense. You've just thrown words at a page.

BlushfulHippocrene
Contributing Reviewer
August 9th 2018


2611 Comments


"holy poor sentence construction" It's two sentences and makes perfect sense.

Digging: Pictureplane - Degenerate

Astral Abortis
August 9th 2018


6736 Comments


"It's two sentences and makes perfect sense."

It really doesn't.

verdant
Staff Reviewer
August 9th 2018


2293 Comments

Album Rating: 3.8

lol snox mad

Astral Abortis
August 9th 2018


6736 Comments


steaming

BlushfulHippocrene
Contributing Reviewer
August 9th 2018


2611 Comments


Kinda curious what about it doesn't. (Not to sound blunt. I want to know.) "The album begins" is the simplest a simple sentence can be. And "It's OK to Cry... glisters it's way into a luculent vocal performance" is a perfectly fine clause -- the "it's" is technically wrong but doesn't impede on the sentence structure.

Astral Abortis
August 9th 2018


6736 Comments


"And "It's OK to Cry... glisters it's way into a luculent vocal performance" is a perfectly fine clause"

Ahh, what you've done there is tricky, but you see, you've just EDITED the original sentence. The original sentence presupposes two different tenses that turn against each other. See, the original clause is that "the album begins before It's Okay to Cry", and then he does the little em-dash to rattle on about the track briefly, which is fine, but the biggest mistake he makes is to use another em-dash, which then presupposes the original clause as being "It's OK to Cry... glisters it's way into a luculent vocal performance", but the sentence is actually reading now as "The album begins before It's Okay to Cry a luculent vocal performance".

See how that makes no sense whatsoever?

A good way to have re-written this would be:

wait, nevermind, it's all so badly written I'd need to take massive liberties to reconstruct the entire paragraph and throw out the long-winded "the album begins" crap entirely because it's just plain bad

Rowan5215
Staff Reviewer
August 9th 2018


40734 Comments

Album Rating: 4.5

lmao cos we thought u were gonna offer a suggestion but then you didn't do the thing we thought u would and did a mean thing instead



gotem good man

verdant
Staff Reviewer
August 9th 2018


2293 Comments

Album Rating: 3.8

that explanation is infinitely more convoluted than the paragraph itself

FearThyEvil
August 9th 2018


16637 Comments


I do agree though that starting a review with "The album begins." is pretty poor. Outside of that I don't really have much to say.

Astral Abortis
August 9th 2018


6736 Comments


The paragraph isn't convoluted, it's just bad and wrong

Winesburgohio
Contributing Reviewer
August 9th 2018


2373 Comments

Album Rating: 2.5

im going to astral abort my goddamn account



no i see what you mean about the first para, but in my defense i don't think the question mark glitch helps my case. as for the second em-dash, it's required in this context to finish the so it doesn't read "it begins before "It's O.K. to Cry" - a glitter bomb cunningly wearing the trousers of a song glisters it's way into a luculent vocal performance" which really would make no sense!!! in this instance i used the em-dash to function as parantheses and not a comma or colon

Digging: Main Attrakionz - 808s and Dark Grapes II

clavier
Contributing Reviewer
August 9th 2018


818 Comments

Album Rating: 3.0

"that explanation is infinitely more convoluted than the paragraph itself" yep



i'm actually trying pretty hard to interpret the sentence in a way that would make it wrong but i can't do it

Digging: Milanku - De Fragments

Astral Abortis
August 9th 2018


6736 Comments


"t's required in this context to finish the so it doesn't read "it begins before "It's O.K. to Cry" - a glitter bomb cunningly wearing the trousers of a song glisters it's way into a luculent vocal performance" which really would make no sense!!! "

Ah but you see, all you need to do is add "that" between song and glisters and hey presto it works

verdant
Staff Reviewer
August 9th 2018


2293 Comments

Album Rating: 3.8

AhhhHHhHH NOOOOO he could have done this ONE THING FOR ME but instead he did this OTHER THING i am CONSUMED BY R AGE



You have to be logged in to post a comment. Login | Create a Profile





STAFF & CONTRIBUTORS // SITE FORUM // CONTACT US

Bands: A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z


Site Copyright 2005-2017 Sputnikmusic.com
All Album Reviews Displayed With Permission of Authors | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy