Foo Fighters
Concrete and Gold


3.5
great

Review

by sugarcubes USER (19 Reviews)
September 15th, 2017 | 47 replies


Release Date: 2017 | Tracklist

Review Summary: The Foo Fighters create 11 solid tracks of pure rock that won't reinvent the wheel, but which are better off for it.

This is the first Foo Fighters album I’ve ever listened to. Although they’ve always been something that would be right up my alley, and even though they’ve made some songs that I’ve enjoyed listening to for years, I’ve never considered actually listening to a Foo Fighters record. This may make me a poor contender for writing a review this early for a band that’s still surprisingly popular among the general public, but if this album is good enough to make me want to listen to the full back catalog of a band that I’ve never really bothered with, then… well, I guess that means something, right?

The Foo Fighters have always had a knack for writing simple and direct rock songs, and that habit doesn’t stop on their ninth release, Concrete and Gold. Even though most of the band are reaching their fifties (with Pat Smear edging out 60!), they really don’t sound their age or show any signs of slowing down any time soon. The first single off the album, “Run”, is wonderfully heavy and huge – a brilliant slab of atmospheric, hard rock that is a perfect taste of what you’re in for - although it should’ve been cut a minute before it finishes.

Delve further into Concrete and Gold, and you’ll find that “Make It Right” offers nice riffs that could’ve fit perfectly on a Led Zeppelin record, though still remaining original and true to the Foos’ sound. Tracks such as “T-Shirt”, which begins the album with a simple acoustic guitar part before blowing up into an enormous, electric rocker, and “Happily Ever After (Zero Hour)”, another more laid-back song with orchestral ornamentation and Beatle-esque guitar and vocal melodies, finely showcase the band’s depth and their ability to still create captivating material 22 years after their first, self-titled release. One of my personal favorites here has to be “Sunday Rain”, which creates a wide soundscape while harkening back to something that could’ve been on Blur’s own self-titled album. It’s restrained when need be, but when they need to rip and create a brilliant, big sound, they just let all that energy release and it’s truly wonderful to hear.

I may be mentioning other artists in this review quite frequently, but it’s important to notice that the Foo Fighters don’t sound like they’re derivative of them on this record, and that it’s more a case of them deciding not to reinvent the wheel and just going out and creating the fine sort of rock that they’ve been doing for the last 20-odd years. And for that, I think they’ve done quite a fine job here. This album won’t be something you’ll go to listen to because it’s something that changed music forever or because it makes you think deeply about everything you’ve ever done; rather, it’s more of something to listen to when you just need some good-old fashioned rock in your life. And really, it’s nice to see that somewhere out there, there’s still a huge, major rock band that’s doing just that.



Recent reviews by this author
Lil Nas X 7Nickelback All the Right Reasons
Drake ScorpionThe Clash Cut the Crap
Hopsin No ShameMoby Animal Rights
user ratings (518)
3
good
other reviews of this album
Jordan M. EMERITUS (2.9)
Pretend there’s nothing wrong, you can sing along with me....

James Enwright (4)
Happy ever after, counting down to zero hour....

ajcollins15 (3)
Ummm...ya it's decent!...

MercuryToHell (4)
The kings of playing it safe have a point to prove....



Comments:Add a Comment 
Tunaboy45
September 15th 2017


18424 Comments


What Foo Fighters do, they do very well.

sugarcubes
September 15th 2017


399 Comments

Album Rating: 3.5

Yup. Definitely

DoofusWainwright
September 15th 2017


19991 Comments

Album Rating: 1.5

'What Foo Fighters do, they do very well.'



Auto-pilot rock?

DrGonzo1937
Staff Reviewer
September 15th 2017


18256 Comments

Album Rating: 2.5

This disappointed me somewhat. I was expecting more, given how good the singles were.

karlulol
September 15th 2017


54 Comments

Album Rating: 3.0

Nice review man! Really is a fun album

sugarcubes
September 15th 2017


399 Comments

Album Rating: 3.5

@karlulol thanks!



and I think it's a good album. nothing too deep but I wouldn't call it autopilot at all.

DoofusWainwright
September 15th 2017


19991 Comments

Album Rating: 1.5

I was expecting nothing, considering how embarrassing 'Run' was.



Probably the strongest cut here too.

DrGonzo1937
Staff Reviewer
September 15th 2017


18256 Comments

Album Rating: 2.5

Doof, you crazy man, Run was great.

Toondude10
September 15th 2017


15184 Comments

Album Rating: 4.0 | Sound Off

I just realized the symbol in the middle are two F's. I feel silly.

sugarcubes
September 15th 2017


399 Comments

Album Rating: 3.5

Run's a great track, a bit long but... eh, I don't care that much.

BlackwaterPork
September 15th 2017


4390 Comments


How much do you reckon that average is gonna drop?

sugarcubes
September 15th 2017


399 Comments

Album Rating: 3.5

Eh I'd say it's probably gonna hover around a 3.6/3.7

Sabrutin
September 15th 2017


9649 Comments


T-Shirt is cool

Toondude10
September 15th 2017


15184 Comments

Album Rating: 4.0 | Sound Off

probably a 3.3 if you ask me because people like Doof want to see it drop even more while others are trying to defend it with their sanity at risk.

DrGonzo1937
Staff Reviewer
September 15th 2017


18256 Comments

Album Rating: 2.5

"I just realized the symbol in the middle are two F's. I feel silly."



Never noticed that myself. haha

DoofusWainwright
September 15th 2017


19991 Comments

Album Rating: 1.5

'People like Doof'



The worst people honestly

butcherboy
September 15th 2017


9464 Comments

Album Rating: 2.0 | Sound Off

should i give this a 2 without listening or 1.5 it without listening?

DoofusWainwright
September 15th 2017


19991 Comments

Album Rating: 1.5

Right on cue, another of these worst sort of people.



2 without listening is fair.



1.5 with listening is fair.



Your choice, that's the objectivity incentive.

Toondude10
September 15th 2017


15184 Comments

Album Rating: 4.0 | Sound Off

seems legit

butcherboy
September 15th 2017


9464 Comments

Album Rating: 2.0 | Sound Off

i listened to a foo fighters album fifteen years ago, so i feel like i already listened to this.. so 2 it is..



You have to be logged in to post a comment. Login | Create a Profile





STAFF & CONTRIBUTORS // CONTACT US

Bands: A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z


Site Copyright 2005-2023 Sputnikmusic.com
All Album Reviews Displayed With Permission of Authors | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy