Starset
Vessels


2.0
poor

Review

by Ben Kupiszewski USER (15 Reviews)
January 22nd, 2017 | 164 replies


Release Date: 2017 | Tracklist

Review Summary: Starset: Sci-fi rock opera here! Starset: Much less than what meets the ear!

I hear there is another Michael Bay Transformers movie, subtitled The Last Knight, to be released this summer. Columbus, Ohio-based space rock enthusiasts Starset must have heard about it too because the quartet’s latest LP Vessels sounds, at least, like an over-the-top attempt to be featured on the film’s butt rock soundtrack. At most, it’s as if Bay commissioned the group to compose an accompanying dramatic score worthy of Hollywood’s notoriously bombastic director.

To that would-be end, Starset largely succeed. They capture Bay’s stylistic lack of subtlety, overabundance of huge computer-driven special effects, and his bloated, incoherent -- both in regard to action and plot -- narrative and transmute it horribly right to music. Frontman and lead vocalist Dustin Bates and Bay are truly artistic kindred spirits. The duo’s back catalogue is full of flashy science fiction epics that are devoid of substance, produced by a big budget and full of contrived and banal dialogue or lyrics. And no matter how much we enjoyed Bay’s original Transformers (2007) and Starset’s 2014 debut, Transmissions -- like how much we ogled Megan Fox’s glistening midriff and lovely bosom dangling over a steamy radiator and or head-banged to “My Demons” -- this time it’s hard to be content with superficial sensual and sensory overload. The novelty has worn thin. Bay’s Transformers sequel Revenge of the Fallen sucked and pretty much everything else that followed. Accordingly, Vessels as an experience is epitomized in a classic scene in which Fox, who has both the looks and acting chops of a porn star, pouts to Shia LaBeouf, “I’m not going to go without you!” The committed couple proceed to run together in slow motion, holding hands, while Fox's boobs bounce and the world around them goes to explosive hell, literally and figuratively, thanks to Bay’s keen pyromaniac and voyeuristic direction.

The fault, of course, in both cases, lies with the people making the creative decisions behind the scenes. Bay, the suits at Paramount and Dreamworks and the film’s producers chose to up the ante, get bigger and louder, as it were, and throw a bunch of money for parlor tricks in making Revenge of the Fallen instead of focusing on storytelling basics such as character development and a screenplay that makes sense. So too do Bates and producer Rob Graves, better known for his touch with Christian nu-metal outfit Red, double down on Starset’s idiosyncrasies and forego shoring up the fundamentals and flaws in the band’s brand of alternative rock. Bates and company aspire to take listeners to the outer limits of the galaxy, heavily relying on synths, strings, inaudible recordings and science-themed lyrics to craft their astral rock. This time, however – and forgive me – they go down the wormhole and never exit out the other side.

For starters, Bates intones too much along the lines of “Satellite…shine your light,” on “Satellite,” or about “Something blocking your reception / It's distorting our connection…You've tuned me out / I've lost your frequency” on – you guessed it – “Frequency.” My favorite example comes from “Ricochet”: “You'd hang on every word I'd say / But now they only ricochet…But when I send my heart your way / It bounces off the walls you made / Ricochet.” It’s the perfect song with enough melodrama for an embattled Marky Mark and Josh Duhamel to stare off in the distance in anguish while Optimus Prime clashes in an incomprehensible metal-on-metal brawl with harebrained Decepticons. Anyway, the clumsy physics metaphors about yearning for unrequited love get stale quickly. They only work great if you want to take a hit of Jack every time you hear a reference to “starlight,” “gravity” or crashing to earth.

That is if you can make them out at all in the din. Bates is far from the best suited vocalist to carry a tune through the sonic chaos Starset create. He lacks the charisma and strength of a Michael Barnes, Benjamin Burnley, Jared Leto, Chino Moreno or other peers and inspirations to do so. To compensate for his relative weakness, his vocals are overly layered and auto-tuned throughout the 70-minute, 15-track run-time. They seemingly undergo more modulations than Bay’s iteration of Bumblebee, a killer robot who doubles as a Chevy Camaro and speaks as if someone’s flipping channels on radio or TV. After all, like Bay, Starset don't subscribe to the theory that less is more.

While this strategy in production enhances tracks like “Starlight,” “Back to Earth” and the funky outlier of the album, “Telepathic,” it is not a cure when Bates really needs to be dynamic with clean and harsh vocals on the massive and promising melody of “Into the Unknown” or the screeching choruses in the horrendous “Gravity of You” and “Last to Fall.” His monochromatic delivery of mechanized growls and cries works at times for the futuristic, sterile soundscape of imagined AIs and faster-than-light travel. Conversely, it often falls flat for projecting emotion and angst in supposedly aggressive anthems like “Bringing It Down” and “Unbecoming,” condemning them and others as underwhelming nu-metal filler.

So while Starset intend to have their listeners escape the confines of gravity and marvel at the dangerous wonders of the universe in the vacuum of space, I can’t help but wish the band grounded itself on earth – on actual rock. For Vessels, guitar riffs and bass licks are vassals to artificial beats, synths and Bates’ augmented voice when it should precisely be the opposite. The atmospheric electronics and strings should exist to embellish the arena rock serrated by powerful vocal inflections. Instead, many tracks sound written for the express purpose of being remixed for the clubs and discotheques.

Despite this overproduction, like in Revenge of the Fallen, there are on occasion some diverting moments – John Turturro’s off-color remark about being “directly below enemy scrotum” stirred a chuckle in me. Vessels has the ominous instrumentals of “The Order” and the pretty denouement in “Richochet.” Closer “Everglow” actually is awesome and strikes the difficult stylistic balance for which Starset had been aiming; it starts dissonant and bright before roaring into a glorious maelstrom of Deftones-influenced cosmic fury. Even so, to reach this summit, it’s hard to slog through what sounds like Owl City’s tribute to nu-metal that's also punctuated by too many forced and needless symphonic epilogues added for extra gravitas.

Skip Vessels for the same type of reasons you should pass on Bay’s latest flick.

Recommended(ish) tracks:
"Starlight"
"Back to Earth"
"Telepathic"
"Everglow"



Recent reviews by this author
Breaking Benjamin EmberBirdy Beautiful Lies
Panic! at the Disco Death of a BachelorRed Sun Rising Polyester Zeal
Breaking Benjamin Dark Before DawnKodaline Coming Up for Air
user ratings (218)
3.5
great
other reviews of this album
xtrole (3.5)
While “Vessels” doesn’t quite measure up to “Transmissions,” it is still able to stand on ...

Toondude (3)
Starset attempt a somewhat more streamlined version of their debut, yet it still leaves a lot to be ...



Comments:Add a Comment 
Kupasexy15
January 22nd 2017


364 Comments

Album Rating: 2.0

I added "recommended tracks."



I know fans are probably going to hate, but I really could not get behind this. Hopefully, I made a compelling argument as to why.

betray
January 22nd 2017


9392 Comments

Album Rating: 2.0

" I really could not get behind this. Hopefully, I made a compelling argument as to why."



not one bit tbh

betray
January 22nd 2017


9392 Comments

Album Rating: 2.0

posd tho

Kupasexy15
January 22nd 2017


364 Comments

Album Rating: 2.0

Why not though? Just curious.

Kupasexy15
January 22nd 2017


364 Comments

Album Rating: 2.0

Thanks, betray.

betray
January 22nd 2017


9392 Comments

Album Rating: 2.0

i'll try again tomorrow but you keep losing me dude



is seeing the transformers movies a prerequisite to reading this review?

Kupasexy15
January 22nd 2017


364 Comments

Album Rating: 2.0

Yeah, but I thought most people have seen them, especially here at place where people are interested in a form of mass culture -- popular music.

Kupasexy15
January 22nd 2017


364 Comments

Album Rating: 2.0

I didn't think it was too much of a stretch.

betray
January 22nd 2017


9392 Comments

Album Rating: 2.0

I mean I get where you're going with it. Perhaps I just prefer a negative review to get to the point of why it sucks instead of the comparisons and analogies



but thats why it's your review and not mine



it's probably me, not you lmao

AsleepInTheBack
Staff Reviewer
January 22nd 2017


10114 Comments


seems like an analogy that went a little too far, thus confusing to those who aren't that familiar with the films, but it made sense and was amusing to me as someone who has seen most of the movies

Kupasexy15
January 22nd 2017


364 Comments

Album Rating: 2.0

No, that's fair enough.

Kupasexy15
January 22nd 2017


364 Comments

Album Rating: 2.0

Well, thanks Asleep.

Kupasexy15
January 22nd 2017


364 Comments

Album Rating: 2.0

I mean the movies make hundreds of millions of dollars worldwide, so I thought it was a safe bet that people have seen them.

AsleepInTheBack
Staff Reviewer
January 22nd 2017


10114 Comments


Nah thats fair enough man, they are absurdly popular and well known. Its certainly a well written review and I actually like the line of comparison, I was just elaborating on why some may not get it. Its the issue that you'll always get whenever you make a review requiring some prerequisite knowledge on the part of the reader, can't be helped

Kupasexy15
January 22nd 2017


364 Comments

Album Rating: 2.0

Well, you're not missing much but a whole lot of sex appeal and explosions.

Kupasexy15
January 22nd 2017


364 Comments

Album Rating: 2.0

Anyway, I need to try to get some sleep, but think long and hard about what I mean, folks (cue Linkin Park's "What I've Done" and fade to black). Lol.

Kupasexy15
January 22nd 2017


364 Comments

Album Rating: 2.0

Or this might help and give those who have not watched the movies an idea: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TKN8y6KBsnQ

Mort.
January 22nd 2017


25062 Comments

Album Rating: 1.5

album sucks and all the high ratings are from fools like snide

Sinternet
Contributing Reviewer
January 22nd 2017


26572 Comments


concept of this sounds fucking stupid

Toondude10
January 22nd 2017


15184 Comments

Album Rating: 3.0

I'm kinda torn on this. Transmissions felt like its own thing while this just borrows from other bands like Red and Breaking Benjamin yet at the same time I think this had the better songs for the most part.



You have to be logged in to post a comment. Login | Create a Profile





STAFF & CONTRIBUTORS // CONTACT US

Bands: A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z


Site Copyright 2005-2023 Sputnikmusic.com
All Album Reviews Displayed With Permission of Authors | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy