Nessly
Still Finessin'


2.5
average

Review

by iloveyouall USER (6 Reviews)
July 15th, 2016 | 25 replies


Release Date: 2016 | Tracklist

Review Summary: A missed opportunity.

Riding the success of a strong breakout-single (Crying in Codeine -- which is a throwback to Atlanta's poster-boy in more than just theme) and collaborative-joints with trap-star Lil Yachty, and Canadian export Night Lovell, Still Finessin’ in many ways is Nessly's first attempt at cementing his position as a potential mainstay amidst the countless one-hit wonders that populate the Atlanta scene. At this Still Finessin’ struggles, Nessly’s autotune-inflected, sing-songy cloud-trap all-too-often feeling a pastiche of influences, recalling those that have already gone on to bigger and better things rather than defining a sound that is truly "Nessly's". This wouldn’t be such a problem were it not for the inconsistency of Nessly’s songwriting, that at times shows the prowess of those he so aspires to stand alongside whilst exposing his inexperience at others. The big name features deliver in half-measures, Night Lovell's by-numbers verse ungraciously adorning the largely underwhelming title track, and Lil Yachty phoning in a verse that sits perfectly well alongside the equally half-baked hook of Season. The beats, whilst perfectly sufficient, often lack any kind of punch, sitting in that void of ineffectuality between success and failure, drifting past without mention. Even when everything comes together -- as it does on the TNGHT/TMRW produced The Sky, that contrasts catchiness and poignancy; the hazey, subdued melody of the beat sitting against the catchy, droning sing-rapping of Nessly (“I just turned 21, yeah/I been 21 my whole life, yeah”) -- things seem squandered. Wedged between tracks that feel more filler than killer, moments like these are neutered by Nessly's inexperience, the whole affair becoming a symbol of missed opportunity. This inexperience, combined with an almost half-arrogant sense of complacency, is Nessly's biggest flaw, with many likely to tune out before he truly hits his stride, instead moving on to one of the countless Future-clones, whose newest mixtape adorns the front page of HNHH. It feels harsh to call this the end of Nessly’s fifteen minutes of fame, but with so much promise gone begging, it seems all-too-likely that Nessly’s fate lies in feature-rapping -- playing second fiddle to those that didn’t make these crucial mistakes; that didn’t let things slip as he has.



Recent reviews by this author
Aine O'Dwyer GegenscheinMåla Carnal Sense
Roro Perrot Ultra Shit FolkRae Sremmurd SremmLife 2
Sewer Election Wreck
user ratings (4)
3.5
great


Comments:Add a Comment 
iloveyouall
July 15th 2016


6312 Comments


woo, another review i struggled to put together.
feels like it's been forever since the words just flowed off the fingertips...
cc is appreciated as always, hope y'all are having a good day. : ) ) )

Jots
Emeritus
July 15th 2016


7562 Comments


(edit: fixed)

i'm being kinda picky. idk. this is a good, concise review


iloveyouall
July 15th 2016


6312 Comments


i actually hated writing this so much.
didn't even bother proofing. will give her a squizz.

Jots
Emeritus
July 15th 2016


7562 Comments


i hate writing anything in the 2-2.5 range because it isn't awful enough to bash totally but isn't good enough to praise so it's kinda just a series of different ways to say "this is mediocre" which is no fun to write indeed

iloveyouall
July 15th 2016


6312 Comments


most of it should be fixed.
don't know what the go with compound adverbs is so I've left it.
but yeah, fuck 2.5 reviews. too much hassle.

iloveyouall
July 15th 2016


6312 Comments


how fucking fruity is that cover btw?

Pon
Emeritus
July 15th 2016


5985 Comments


Break it up into paragraphs a wee bit. Alright, gonna nit-pick hard.

First sentence could use some condensing. Instead of using the word "scene" twice you could've said "Still Finessin’ in many ways is Nessly's first attempt at solidifying a position in the Atlanta scene, amidst the countless one-hit wonders" for example. Also describing the collabs as "well-received" isn't entirely necessary as their good reception is implied by the success you cited at the start of the sentence.

I'd also just say "collaborations with Lil Yachty, and Night Lovell" instead of what you have there now 'cause as it is it's just more unnecessary info in what is already a very tightly packed sentence.

I'd also prob use a synonym for "recalling" in the second sentence as you've used "recall" in the first, doesn't matter that much though. Or you could just drop the "recalling those that have already gone on to bigger and better things" because it sort of just restates what you wrote immediately before.

Third sentence could be also condensed (especially in the second half) to something like "This wouldn’t be such a problem were it not for Nessly’s inconsistent songwriting, at times showing the prowess of his idols while exposing crippling inexperience and growing pains at others."

"The big name features deliver in half-measures, Night Lovell delivering a Night-Lovell-by-numbers verse" -- more repetitive word usage. Perhaps replace "delivering" with a phrase like "laying down" and get rid of the second "Night Lovell" because we know who you're referring to.

"The beats never miss the mark, but rarely ever hit it" -- I know what you're trying to say but you can come up with a better metaphor than that. You should probably break that second last sentence in two as well, because it's a bit of a run-on as is.

Otherwise, nice job. Gave me a decent idea what to expect should I listen to this (which I won't). Pos.

Pon
Emeritus
July 15th 2016


5985 Comments


Oh shit Johnny already fixed you up on half o' that. Well, never mind then.

iloveyouall
July 15th 2016


6312 Comments


I like tightly packed sentences, fucker!
but yeah, idk, I had it as paragraphs, then it seemed like too many small ideas, so I lumped it into a blurb and tried to connect things and it became run-on-on-on. I feel the crit.
didn't have much to say really. ended up trying to conjure an argument out of nothing lmao.

Pon
Emeritus
July 15th 2016


5985 Comments


Even as a block of text the review still has a definite intro-body-conclusion structure. First three sentences would make a fine into, for example.

iloveyouall
July 15th 2016


6312 Comments


k, i gave that fucker some liposuction. hopefully it reads a bit better now.

p4p
July 15th 2016


1959 Comments


what's with the snapchat cover that is so bad

iloveyouall
July 15th 2016


6312 Comments


it's a terrible cover ya.

TVC15
July 15th 2016


11372 Comments


It's always a good day when Sach publishes a review. Pos

iloveyouall
July 15th 2016


6312 Comments


thanks fam.

Conmaniac
July 15th 2016


27677 Comments


really intrigued me. checked his hit single and its pretty dope. howd he get so famous though like how did that song blow up?

iloveyouall
July 15th 2016


6312 Comments


idk tbh. it just went nuts on soundcloud for whatever reason.

Conmaniac
July 15th 2016


27677 Comments


crazy man. weird how like songs just blow up like that yknow. like who starts that

iloveyouall
July 15th 2016


6312 Comments


i feel like someone kinda famous probably dropped his name and/or compared him to all of the artists he sounds like (future, post malone, travis scott to an extent).

Conmaniac
July 15th 2016


27677 Comments


man oh man imagine doing that like you're so popular you just name drop some random dude you found and he like has a mini explosion of popularity and youre just like yeah man

crazy



You have to be logged in to post a comment. Login | Create a Profile





STAFF & CONTRIBUTORS // CONTACT US

Bands: A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z


Site Copyright 2005-2023 Sputnikmusic.com
All Album Reviews Displayed With Permission of Authors | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy