The Strypes
Little Victories


1.5
very poor

Review

by ArtBox USER (29 Reviews)
June 19th, 2016 | 2 replies


Release Date: 2015 | Tracklist

Review Summary: The best necromancers of the modern era.

We’ve heard this story before. Once upon a time, in the vein of Jet and Wolfmother before them, The Strypes were supposed to be that band that made rock and roll great again, that ended up decidedly not making rock and roll great again, and inevitably came out as a hollow shadow of bands that made their mark decades ago. However, with their sophomore release The Strypes manage to defy the main defining figure of the revivalist attitude: the perpetual cycle of releases all sounding the same. Instead, The Strypes transition from standard, derivative blues stereotypes to standard, derivative millennial indie rock stereotypes.

As much as I give them flak, they’re good with their instruments, and the rhythm section in particular has stepped up its game from Snapshot, with a crunchier bass tone and occasional restraint from doing every possible fill at every possible moment. It may be less insipid than it was before, but it's still insipid, and at this point in their career, the main cause of debate – fawning over the contrast between their age and the style of music they play – has inevitably been outgrown, and irrelevant to the discussion. The larger problem that comes from the stylistic shift is that where songs could previously just sound like any bluesy pub band, the songs now sound like other artists more than the genre. With its staccato guitar and consistent tom pounding, “Eighty-Four” could fit on any early Arctic Monkeys album, and album opener “Get Into It” has more than a passing resemblance to Franz Ferdinand’s “No You Girls,” if Franz Ferdinand decided to throw away their quirkiness. Respite comes in the softer cuts like “(I Wanna Be Your) Everyday” and “Three Streets and a Village Green”, but these are few and far between, and still don’t fix the issue lying behind the majority of The Strypes’ output.

A major reason for crucifying the band in the past was the lyrics, and the generic wordplay and subjects (sorry, Mr. Ross Farrelly, but I don’t find it notable to know a ‘Blue Collar Jane.’ There are a lot of blue collars and a lot of Janes.) Of course, with maturity comes the need to address the modern era in a hard-hitting fashion, and yet going through with it with titles like “Status Update” and songs about hitting it off with a girl through online chat (see: “Get Into It”, with a stunning chorus of “Ahh… get into it”) makes it all seem rather disingenuous. With guitarist Josh McClorey making himself more prominent on harmonies, it emphasises even more that these guys agree with each other on singing “I’m at the panic station / Trying to catch a train to relief” with a straight face. By the time “Cruel Brunette” comes around, they’ve exhausted all the objects they could compare women to, including but not limited to: caffeine, chewing gum that “tastes like girls,” and a full cup of tea. Come to think of it, this food fixation is strangely fetishised.

In a disappointing way, The Strypes fall into a case of Jake Bugg Syndrome; whatever potential they have is hampered by an inability to escape the lyrical clutches of evil women, or the excessive fascination with emulating the templates of those before them. The days of being labelled "One Direction with instruments" have long passed, and they're steadily improving - but the banality has stuck firmly in place.



Recent reviews by this author
Ripship Fearsome EngineBarenaked Ladies In Flight
ODE Willie's Funky Bunch 4Blu Fish Shments
ODE Willie's Funky Bunch ThrockmortonSaint Tomorrow Households
user ratings (3)
1.5
very poor
related reviews

Snapshot
recommended by reviewer
Anyone Else, Really Anything Else, Really


Comments:Add a Comment 
ArtBox
June 19th 2016


315 Comments

Album Rating: 1.5

I had to add this to the database today. It was released in July last year. That's how much Sputnik forgot The Strypes after the initial wave.



I don’t usually think I write negative reviews well. Probably because the band seem like nice guys, and I genuinely liked “Everyday,” despite (or because of) its familiarity.



Also snorted at NME calling out this album's "dated and unoriginal sound" while praising the debut's '60s worship.

becomesmusical
June 20th 2016


87 Comments


You didn't exactly tear them apart, but you highlighted the lack of pros well. Previously established biases aside, what I gathered from this review is that the album's a derivative mess that draws from the most tedious facets of its influences. Bringing nothing new to the table makes for an unremarkable album; presenting "the old" as tepidly as possible makes for an atrocious one. I've gathered it's really not something I'd care to hear, so the 1.5 is more or less justified. Pos.



You have to be logged in to post a comment. Login | Create a Profile





STAFF & CONTRIBUTORS // CONTACT US

Bands: A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z


Site Copyright 2005-2023 Sputnikmusic.com
All Album Reviews Displayed With Permission of Authors | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy