CHVRCHES
Every Open Eye


3.5
great

Review

by NordicMindset USER (160 Reviews)
October 8th, 2015 | 23 replies


Release Date: 2015 | Tracklist

Review Summary: Taking a step backwards.

While it may not be completely fair to hold Every Open Eye to the extremely high standards that The Bones of What You Believe set, comparisons are inevitable in the music business. The sheer quality of CHVRCHES’ debut album was a landmark achievement for the world of modern synthpop, and it should come as no surprise that that record is being held as the current “gold standard” for their new material. Songs like “The Mother We Share” and “Recover” ranked amongst the best of 2013 due to their addictive synth lines and Lauren Mayberry’s luscious vocals. They quickly rose to fame not only in their native Scotland but all across the world, opening the door for more opportunities with the second go-around.

Every Open Eye isn’t much different from The Bones of What You Believe, yet it feels much less immediate and memorable than its predecessor. Make no mistake – there are some great songs on the album, but not many of them match up to the quality that they previously delivered. Tracks like “Empty Threat” and “Make Them Gold” may be in the upper half on Every Open Eye, but they would be B-side material at best on their debut. The melodies are just weaker than they were on Bones, and that’s unfortunate for a band like CHVRCHES that uses them heavily as one of their strengths. Songs like the aforementioned “Make Them Gold” come off as too safe, culminating in a chorus that feels incredibly flat, while “Bury It” has not even a shred of catchiness within its entire runtime. Above all, Every Open Eye is too consistent in sound; the variation is kept to a minimum, leaving listeners with an endless barrage of uptempo, synth-laden electropop that rarely deviates from the mean.

Yet for all its imperfections and blemishes, the album still is a far cry from subpar. Mayberry’s vocals still soar with a smooth beauty, alternating between the definitive dismissiveness of “Leave a Trace” and the audible desperation present in “Keep You On My Side”. Her voice cuts through the layers of synthesizers so seamlessly, filling the air with a feeling of sweetness whenever she sings. There’s also “High Enough to Carry You Over”, the most polarizing track on the album. In a record dominated by a repetition of the same sound, hearing Martin Doherty step up to the mic for once is a breath of fresh air, especially when his performance is much improved from “Under the Tide” on Bones.

While Every Open Eye definitely takes a few steps back from CHVRCHES’ debut, it’s a decent enough album in its own right. It’s one step forward and another two back, which is frustrating because of the potential they displayed on The Bones of What You Believe. In all honesty, the chances of them improving on what they already had going for them was less than the chances of them regressing to a worse version of themselves. If you think about it that way, maybe it’s not so surprising.



Recent reviews by this author
Green Day Father of All MotherfuckersLinkin Park One More Light
Incubus (USA-CA) 8Highly Suspect The Boy Who Died Wolf
From Ashes To New Day OneFrank Turner Mittens
user ratings (620)
3.5
great
other reviews of this album
Sowing STAFF (3.5)
Chvrches craft a focused and energetic follow up to their celebrated debut, and perhaps even top it ...



Comments:Add a Comment 
ScuroFantasma
Emeritus
October 8th 2015


11992 Comments


Good rev Green

granitenotebook
Staff Reviewer
October 8th 2015


1271 Comments

Album Rating: 3.5

great review, consistent and gets the point across.

SoundEscape
October 8th 2015


21 Comments


Firstly, In my opinion there aren't many songs here that would even fit in their debut, the album has the same synth pop basis, but the sound goes for a different mood. Both the production and the vocals are much cleaner and warmer. The album itself is just much sweeter.
Secondly, this album isn't as immediate? The songs and the melodies within them are mostly simpler than the ones on their debut, without losing the catchines and even improving on the sweetnes factor. So, this is another one of those "Simpler = Worse" opinions/reviews?
Thirdly, you are pointing out that most of this album's songs are lacking in quality compared to the debut's, so to me you sound like one of those TBOWYB fans acting like that album was consistently great with no subpar songs. That it was a perfect album except for a pair of songs, "Under The Tide" for sure , and that's just not the case. That album had clear standout tracks with a pretty big part of the album being much less immediate, memorable and consistent. There aren't any songs here, that are such low points on the album and It's much more consistent for it.
And I don't want to come off as a hardcore fanboy saying that Every Open Eye is a 5, no, it's absolutely not, but is it noticably worse than their debut? Hell no. Many of you, the TBOWYB super-fans are just repeating the idea that this such a step backwards, it's the same, but worse, or just so streamlined, and then the only argument for that are a few songs, the best songs on the last album, that this albums best songs for some reason can't even touch, come on dude, that's the best you've got?

DropdeadWHA
October 8th 2015


1396 Comments

Album Rating: 4.5

Really cannot see the step backwards perspective with this album.

Snake.
October 8th 2015


25255 Comments

Album Rating: 3.0

bones is better

Jots
Emeritus
October 8th 2015


7562 Comments

Album Rating: 2.0

"So, this is another one of those "Simpler = Worse" opinions/reviews?"

- he said he thought the melodies were weaker and less immediate, which is an opinion. the thesis of the entire review isn't that simplicity makes this inferior - you're putting words in his mouth. he just found the record a bit samey in comparison and less engaging. deal with it.



"Thirdly, you are pointing out that most of this album's songs are lacking in quality compared to the debut's, so to me you sound like one of those TBOWYB fans acting like that album was consistently great with no subpar songs."

- well, maybe he genuinely thinks Bones is better.



"but is it noticably worse than their debut? Hell no."

- he gave it a 3.5/5 so clearly he liked it regardless.



"come on dude, that's the best you've got?"

- it's not a reviewer's duty to convince you that you're wrong for liking an album. all he can do is be honest about how he feels.

Mutantsnowstorm
October 8th 2015


514 Comments

Album Rating: 4.0 | Sound Off

I love this sooo much more than the debut, I don't understand why people think this isn't as good if not better

JWT155
October 8th 2015


14953 Comments

Album Rating: 3.5 | Sound Off

This album takes a giant leap towards mainstream appeal, it's structure is a lot more streamlined and run of the mill than their debut but I still really enjoy this.

SoundEscape
October 8th 2015


21 Comments


Johny, you are serious with giving this a 1,5.....? Is it on Blood on The Dance Floor's level of bad?


Jots
Emeritus
October 8th 2015


7562 Comments

Album Rating: 2.0

I would never listen to a full BOTDF album so I suppose I'll never know

luci
October 8th 2015


12844 Comments


he rated it the same as the new julia holter record. just an fyi for whoever is deciding whether to give his rating attention

Jots
Emeritus
October 8th 2015


7562 Comments

Album Rating: 2.0

sassypants

JWT155
October 8th 2015


14953 Comments

Album Rating: 3.5 | Sound Off

Anarchy on Sputnik

Isaacdiaz
October 10th 2015


91 Comments

Album Rating: 4.0 | Sound Off

He gave this and twenty on pilots 1.5 and 1 respectively smh

treeqt.
October 10th 2015


16970 Comments


yeah this and something about wilderness are solid 2.0s johnny should stop rating

Jots
Emeritus
October 10th 2015


7562 Comments

Album Rating: 2.0

will amend if and only if y'all gimme an a-men

Jots
Emeritus
October 10th 2015


7562 Comments

Album Rating: 2.0

i said a'can I get an aaaaaamen

treeqt.
October 10th 2015


16970 Comments


there you go https://youtu.be/QoyVfPcE3ks?t=42m50s

Jots
Emeritus
October 10th 2015


7562 Comments

Album Rating: 2.0

there, amended. now errbody can rest easy

Parallels
October 10th 2015


10146 Comments

Album Rating: 4.0

idk i think a 3.5 is a damn good album even if it isn't perfect



You have to be logged in to post a comment. Login | Create a Profile





STAFF & CONTRIBUTORS // CONTACT US

Bands: A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z


Site Copyright 2005-2023 Sputnikmusic.com
All Album Reviews Displayed With Permission of Authors | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy