Veil of Maya
Matriarch


2.5
average

Review

by chriskrispy USER (1 Reviews)
May 18th, 2015 | 12 replies


Release Date: 2015 | Tracklist

Review Summary: Veil of Maya swap their uniquely technical sounds for a much simpler product, which may welcome some, but will alienate previous fans.

As metalcore begins to fade from the spotlight, many bands have begun changing their sound so as to stay fresh, and differentiate themselves from their peers. August Burns Red has adopted a more symphonic sound, Of Mice & Men switched to radio rock, and Attila went from an actual guilty pleasure to being a horrid brodown. However, Veil of Maya always differentiated themselves using ridiculous riffs, weird time signatures, and breakneck drumming. Most importantly, they never relied on generic breakdowns to get the job done. Unfortunately, "Matriarch" shows a regression in the band's talents, opting for something that's hard to distinguish from any other progressive metalcore band.
That's not to say "Matriarch" is an atrocious album, it has its moments that are enjoyable. The band haven't forgotten how to play their instruments, and utilize many incredible riffs. Flashes of mind-bending technicality can be seen by the guitars and the drummer, but are spaced throughout the album, possibly as a benefit to the listener. "Teleute" and "Phoenix" are the highlights of the album, mixing some more popular elements of metalcore with usual Veil of Maya concepts. These songs undoubtedly represent the direction they should have taken with the album, as the rest of the album is easily forgettable.

A considerable difference from the group's previous releases is their new found reliance on vocals. New vocalist Lukas Magyar has a distinct feature separating him from the previous one: He sings very frequently, and to a degree that tends to become overwhelming. Modern progressive metal can obviously work with singing, but mediocre singing is mediocre no matter what genre it is. His screams are effective enough, perhaps slightly better than the vocalist he replaced. In no way is he the worst replacement that could have been found, his parts only serve to hinder the band.

Beyond the decent parts, there are truly disappointing moments of the album. Along with singing sections, the band has decided to rely on chugging for most of the album. Therein lies the true issue with "Matriarch," as the aforementioned chugging bogs down every track, and seems to only be used to attract new fans adorned with snapbacks and Nikes. The obvious change in writing seems to have been done late into the process, as "Aeris" is unquestionably the worst track the band has ever written. It begins with a rather serene lead part, then attempts to surprise the listener with an onslaught of screaming and moderate rhythm, and continues onward much like a wounded animal that could barely be considered a B-side. "Mikasa" also sets a new record for the band for most generic song, featuring boring chugging and a poor attempt at a chorus. These and many more poor choices made by the band only serve to reduce the shine on the finer parts of the album.

Even with the album's poor choices in songwriting, it's still much better than many metal bands' attempts to net a wider audience. It's not as much of a whiplash as Architects' switch from mathcore to borecore, nor is it as masterful as Mastodon's most recent LP. It has its disappointing moments, but still retains some of Veil of Maya's signature flair, albeit reduced significantly. Unfortunately, the many missteps reduce the replayability of the record, and any replays only serve to expose more of the flaws plaguing it. It's clear that the band hasn't descended into utter garbage, but they are teetering on the edge of the cliff. Hopefully, they don't make the jump.


user ratings (593)
3.4
great
other reviews of this album
peartnoy (3.5)
Rebuilding with a solid foundation....

Chris Maitland (3)
A new vocalist and refocused sound nets mixed results for Veil of Maya on "Matriarch"...

Kascade (4)
A solid album with a re-birth in sound....

paradox1216 (3.5)
Veil of Maya sacrifice some of their original melodic identity to bring us a catchy yet derivative m...



Comments:Add a Comment 
chriskrispy
May 18th 2015


22 Comments

Album Rating: 2.5

If a rating of 2.4999999999999 was allowed, I'd use it. Rounded up just because I like the band's previous works.

My first complete attempt at reviewing anything in a long time, any and all constructive criticism is more than welcome.

someguest
May 18th 2015


30126 Comments


Most importantly, they never relied on chugging to get the job done.


What the fuck

chriskrispy
May 18th 2015


22 Comments

Album Rating: 2.5

It was never prolonged, and usually segued into a nice riff. Perhaps I'm remembering their old stuff a little too fondly, but it was apparent they relied on it a lot more on this record

someguest
May 18th 2015


30126 Comments


Don't get me wrong, I find [id] to be an enjoyable record but 90% of it is chug.

chriskrispy
May 18th 2015


22 Comments

Album Rating: 2.5

It's definitely hard to say there was no chugging, virtually no band existing within a core subgenre doesn't do it at some point (They're certainly no exception), it just never felt like they were solely relying on chugging and a generic breakdown pattern to get through the song. I'll take chugging in weird time signatures above half-time chugs any day of the week.

ElegantElephant
May 18th 2015


1391 Comments

Album Rating: 3.0

dude, marc thrives on chugging, half of common man's collapse is a breakdown. theres honestly probably less on here than on that or [id].

chriskrispy
May 18th 2015


22 Comments

Album Rating: 2.5

The statement was more focused towards saying there was never a reliance on generic breakdown patterns that seem to exist just to bring the junz. I changed it to avoid future confusion. Either way you could easily pick an old Veil of Maya breakdown out of a crowd of their peers.

chinesewhispers
May 18th 2015


4767 Comments


So you're saying that even though their prior albums may have contained more chugging, they still pulled it off somewhat interestingly, but here it feels more forced and generic when it actually does come up?

chriskrispy
May 18th 2015


22 Comments

Album Rating: 2.5

Essentially, yes. As odd as that sounds, their use of odd timings/patterns absolutely separated them from bands who chugged just to chug. But every time it happens on this album, it's usually in a breakdown that sounds almost exactly the same as every other breakdown to happen since Risecore. It's a little more technical than that, but it's still structured the exact same way.

peartnoy
May 18th 2015


2184 Comments

Album Rating: 3.5

I basically disagree with 90% of this review, oh well.

chriskrispy
May 18th 2015


22 Comments

Album Rating: 2.5

To each their own. If this was an entirely new band I'd probably react much more positively, but it's hard not to be bitter to go from jams like "It's Not Safe to Swim Today" to stuff like "Mikasa." But it is technically a lot easier to listen to this new album.

ayylmao
June 8th 2015


7 Comments

Album Rating: 3.5

Dude, this album probably has the least chugging compared to Eclipse, ID and CMC. And funny how you dislike the chugging but still cite "Phoenix" as your favourite track. Btw, VOM barely uses odd time signatures, they are mostly polyrhythms, which are not the same.



You have to be logged in to post a comment. Login | Create a Profile





STAFF & CONTRIBUTORS // CONTACT US

Bands: A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z


Site Copyright 2005-2023 Sputnikmusic.com
All Album Reviews Displayed With Permission of Authors | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy