Nine Inch Nails
Pretty Hate Machine: 2010 Remaster


2.0
poor

Review

by Herbie Chrost USER (22 Reviews)
May 6th, 2015 | 46 replies


Release Date: 2010 | Tracklist

Review Summary: "What I used to think was me is jut a fading memory; I looked him right in the eye and I said 'goodbye'"

One of the chief reasons people seem to hate the original Pretty Hate Machine is the “piss poor production.” These same people cite the music as “quiet,” “lo-fi in the bad way,” and variations thereof. In the remaster, however, it gleams and shines like a polished diamond. The sound in general is very crisp, and it literally sounds like a well-polished modern day pop or industrial rock album with the clipping and compression in full swing.

Before I proceed any further there are a few things I want to address:

1. The first time I heard PHM, I listened to the remaster. With that said, it subconsciously became a tad harder to focus on the more subtle approach to sampling on the original whereas I was used to the conspicuous crisp loudness of the remaster.

2. If The Downward Spirals was NIN’s first album and this remaster became the official release of PHM and made its debut in 2010, I would not at all mind this album too much. Electronic albums suffer most from clipping and are more blatantly discernable than a, say, metal record where it would take someone like Rick Rubin to really distort an electric guitar. But despite the plethora of clipping - still continuing aforementioned theory - this record would be a breath of fresh air and be a more than welcome sound for the band. With this album taking up where The Slip left off, PHM would be a strong achievement in the NIN discography and would even aptly foreshadow the fully electronic laced album Hesitation Marks. However, in the context of a remaster, this album is a disaster. Yes it sounds unbelievably crisp and polished brighter than any diamond (and it succeeds in that way) but the remaster only accomplishes just that.

To avoid a track-by-track I will address typical compliments directed to the remaster to keep the rest of this review concise.

“It sounds less dated and it sounds better with a louder beefed up production!”:

Although the original can sound quite 80’s-ish, there a few other 80’s masterpieces I want to call out that also “suffer” from this outdated type of production: Tears for Fears’ “The Hurting” and Depeche Mode’s “Black Celebration.” While neither of those two album don’t necessarily have the musical complexity of PHM (Depeche’ Black Celebration more comparable of the two) upon hearing them, there is no denying that they are quite “quiet” in terms of loudness. Even despite the quietness of those albums, I have never seen, heard, or met anyone who has criticized either of the two for the “outdated”/”quiet” production.

“On Head Like a Hole, the bass is badass and the drums bang your head in the remaster, it’s sexy!”:

If you’re to crank the volume on the original to a comfortably loud level to match the remaster, the drums on both versions have the same punch. But there is one huge difference and it can be found in the chorus. The chorus on the original is claustrophobic with a chainsaw-like guitar riff and synthesizers going absolutely berserk in the background. In the remaster, the (clipped to oblivion) guitar drowns every other instrument out leaving the “banging” drums almost acting more like added bass than actual percussion and the intricate synthesizers in the original are completely gone. And you wanna know something you’ve likely never heard on Head Like a Hole? If you listen closely, you can hear timely sampled cymbals crash sporadically in the far background throughout the chorus. On the remaster it is inaudible.

“Everything is so pronounced! You’ll notice things you didn’t notice in the original sparkle in the remaster!”:

Terrible lie. The drums on “Terrible Lie” and “Down in it” sound like metal clanking, but lose that metallic feel when heard on the remaster. With everything the same volume due to compression, the vocals on “Sin” and “Down in it” are substantially drowned while the instrumentation outdo the vocals and other nuanced samples mixed in. The chorus on the remaster for “Down in it” almost renders the gangly chanted “heeeyy”s while the sporadic guitar lines and sampled drum beats end up sounding like tv static while the repition of “Hey God” that bookends every verse on “Terrible Lie” are drowned out with the sampled guitar riffs also ending up drowned out in the chorus.

Another thing about the instrumentals that become annoying is how loud the background synths become. While on the original the synths that serve as nothing more but to help facilitate the mood of the song, they become way too loud for their use and end up becoming the “loudest” instrument hearable in the extreme cases of compression on this album (just listen to “Terrible Lie”). On the remaster, the “vocal” background synth on “Down in it” (most notable during the bridge and the final chorus) loses notability and the listener will fail to realize that it is reprised later on the last verse and chorus on “That’s What I Get.”

On “Kinda I Want to” the erratic synthesizers and reckless abandon of sampled percussion float around with ease blasting your ears with the barrage of samples; on the remaster it sounds like pure noise moving around the 2 speakers. Closely listening to “Kinda I Want to,” it is noticeable that instrumental elements of “Down in it” are reprised in the breakdown + guitar section but on the remaster it’s going to take quite a few listens with so much of its subtlety lost.

Despite all of that, I firmly believe that “Something I Can Never Have” most definitely benefited the most in terms of the remastered production. While the lyrics are banal, this new remaster more than makes up for it. Indeed the loudness is beefed up but the minimalist type structure grants the song less reasons to suffer due to increased loudness and achieves exactly what the remaster was aiming for. The song, like every other song on the album, is crisp and polished, but the compression ends up (surprisingly) benefitting the song’s ominous atmosphere and leaves it absolutely crushing to listen to with machinery whirring in the background and birds chirping apathetically in the background towards the end. The hopelessness and the despair writhing from every word Trent spits out pleads to the listener to not help him grant what he can’t have (but neither does he want sympathy) but to hear what he’s saying and leave it as a confession he wanted to get off his chest. The confession that the pretty hate machine (whirring and working her gears in the piano/atmosphere driven ballad) will be the end of him.


And that’s what Pretty Hate Machine sounds like. A confession bridled up inside Trent waiting to explode onto the listener in hopes you will, not just hear but to listen to his cries. Regardless of bad remastered production. Pretty Hate Machine will always go down as one Nine Inch Nails greatest efforts as an album, concept, and achievement.



Rating as an album: 5/5
Rating as a "Remaster": 2/5



Recent reviews by this author
Kanye West Donda 2Failure Fantastic Planet
Merzbow VenereologySoundtrack (Film) The Crow: City of Angels
Shredder 1984 NemesisLinkin Park One More Light Live
user ratings (298)
4.3
superb
other reviews of this album
rjmunthe (5)
It really is a masterpiece, after all......

MassiveAttack (4.5)
Truly you aren’t hearing another Nine Inch Nails LP; this is the debut, but with a substantial cha...



Comments:Add a Comment 
TwigTW
May 6th 2015


3934 Comments


Didn't know people hated the original Pretty Hate Machine.

"how do I italicize and bold words?"
BB Code: http://www.sputnikmusic.com/forums/misc.php?do=bbcode

". . . is jut a fading memory . . . "

Supercoolguy64
May 6th 2015


11787 Comments


YOU'RE GOOOOIIIIINGGGGG
TO
GET
WHAT
YOOOOUUU DESEEEEEERRRVVVEEE

ArsMoriendi
May 6th 2015


40960 Comments


Why all of the negs? Review wasn't bad.

TheCrocodile
May 6th 2015


2925 Comments

Album Rating: 4.0

It's unpolished, but I've seen worse on here.

Parallels
May 6th 2015


10144 Comments


Oh you are so dead.

People aren't going to read through to the point where you rated the original a 5.

Honestly I don't know why this album is even still up on the site. We normally don't allow remasters of every album do we? Just because they added a song and changed the album art?

deathschool
May 6th 2015


28620 Comments


Oh.












It's a microphone.

ArsMoriendi
May 6th 2015


40960 Comments


Wait... the cover is a microphone?

I knew it was something metal!

Fuuuck.

Supercoolguy64
May 6th 2015


11787 Comments


wtf no way
looks like a line of people, only all distorted and shit

Parallels
May 6th 2015


10144 Comments


I thought it was some part inside of a piano

I remember him saying whatever it was they were trying to make something mechanical look like ribs

Supercoolguy64
May 6th 2015


11787 Comments


i thought it was like a pair of boots or something the first time i saw it

deathschool
May 6th 2015


28620 Comments


It's totally a microphone

Parallels
May 6th 2015


10144 Comments


how does that even remotely resemble boots?

Supercoolguy64
May 6th 2015


11787 Comments


idk they kinda look like the really fancy kind

Parallels
May 6th 2015


10144 Comments


this the most difficult game of I Spy i have ever played

TwigTW
May 6th 2015


3934 Comments


It's a microphone.

ArsMoriendi
May 6th 2015


40960 Comments


http://www.soundstagedirect.com/media/nine_inch_nails_pretty_hate_machine_reissue.jpg

It looks more obviously like a microphone in this extended picture.

Parallels
May 6th 2015


10144 Comments


That choir-like bellowing in Sanctified that almost sounds demonic is so awesome I would sample it if I was a hip-hop artist.

laughingman22
May 6th 2015


2838 Comments


I thought the cover was some type of mechanical rib cage. I can see the microphone but thats lame.
I've never checked the remaster but the original production didn't bother me just the songwriting and general cheesiness

Parallels
May 6th 2015


10144 Comments


It's a microphone [1356246]

DrGonzo1937
Staff Reviewer
May 6th 2015


18253 Comments

Album Rating: 4.0

Some of the word choices on this review are pretty bad. Not a bad rev though. And I agree with the points made.



You have to be logged in to post a comment. Login | Create a Profile





STAFF & CONTRIBUTORS // CONTACT US

Bands: A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z


Site Copyright 2005-2023 Sputnikmusic.com
All Album Reviews Displayed With Permission of Authors | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy