Three Days Grace
Human


1.5
very poor

Review

by Toondude USER (77 Reviews)
March 31st, 2015 | 37 replies


Release Date: 2015 | Tracklist

Review Summary: ...dead

It’s been a grueling two years for Three Days Grace. With Adam Gontier out of the picture, it became the duty of Matt Walst to fill in the lead position, only to be met with skeptics questioning whether or not Matt could capture the “passion” and “raw talent” of Gontier. That’s when ‘Painkiller’ was released to the public, welcomed by two opinions. Three Days Grace elitists immediately pushed the band aside, claiming that it’s just wasn’t the same, typing down their “I miss Adam” comments on Youtube, and weeping for the inevitable demise of a band they once loved. The others however, simply stated “It’s a Three Days Grace song,” and went on their merry way. Thus we have Human, the first full length album featuring Matt Walst as the lead vocalist, and quite possibly the first album that even the most devoted fans didn’t care for.

Right now, Three Days Grace are suffering from a case of “Nickelback Syndrome,” the delusion that the band can still get away with the typical clichéd themes that have been told way before they even formed. How “I’m sick of running” and how “I don’t belong here” despite the fact that the band's image has been changed multiple times for better or worse. The biggest problem with this is that Human constantly repeats the same ideas and lyrical themes over and over again, and it weighs down the entire album so much that it scrapes the bottom of the barrel. Songs like ‘Painkiller’ and ‘Human Race’ are perfect examples of this, as the choruses are constantly repeated over and over again (monotonous enough to make 'Until It's Gone' look varied) to the point where it's cringeworthy. It’s only made it worse because Matt Walst’s vocals are so laughably bad that it might give Tyler Connelly from Theory of a Deadman a run for his money.

Three Days Grace are also suffering from an identity crisis, as the production shows so well. Human is caught between Three Days Grace’s old sound, the heavy, catchy side of the spectrum, and an “atmospheric”, electric-filled sound in an attempt to be different. What results is a confused and unfocused mess. The production is on this roller coaster ride teetering between proving that Three Days Grace is still the band that fans loved with songs like ‘Landmine’ and ‘So What’, and a band trying different ideas and a different sound that has already been taken in the first place. The atmospheric ideas that are present in ‘The Real You’ and ‘Car Crash’ are so incredibly unoriginal that it’s not so much “stepping outside their comfort zone” as it’s more like they're just finding an excuse to say “Hey look, we’ve changed our sound, that makes us better, right?” Thus a question is raised, what exactly are Three Days Grace trying to prove?

This is an album that almost everyone is going to forget even existed within the next year. There isn’t a single song on here that’s noteworthy of praise. The lyrics, the guitar riffs, and the production of each and every song on Human are so predictable and unmemorable that they practically hand themselves over to the cutting board, waiting for the critics to chop it to pieces. Three Days Grace has been reaching towards a genre that’s been dead for years at this point. They’re out of ideas and have absolutely nowhere to turn. This isn’t what music critics are looking for, and this isn’t an album that fans are going to listen to. Human is, put simply, a Three Days Grace album, and that itself is a felony.



Recent reviews by this author
Periphery Periphery V: Djent Is Not a GenreIn Flames Foregone
Shinedown Planet ZeroEvanescence The Bitter Truth
Starset DivisionsKamelot The Shadow Theory
user ratings (539)
2.1
poor
other reviews of this album
1 of


Comments:Add a Comment 
Toondude10
March 31st 2015


15372 Comments

Album Rating: 1.5

there's more reviews for this on the way!

this was a lot worse than I expected it to be

Credit to ExplosiveOranges for proofreading, feedback appreciated

Mongi123
March 31st 2015


22443 Comments

Album Rating: 1.5

Nice work dude. Agreed so hard too.

someguest
March 31st 2015


30519 Comments


They're only Human guys. They make mistakes too.

Toondude10
March 31st 2015


15372 Comments

Album Rating: 1.5

The question remains...who will get the feature first!?

someguest
March 31st 2015


30519 Comments


Transit of Uranus

Toondude10
March 31st 2015


15372 Comments

Album Rating: 1.5

oh shit! mine got flagged :D

WesleyJones
March 31st 2015


199 Comments

Album Rating: 1.0 | Sound Off

Goddamnit guys, I was here first

NervousBreakdown
March 31st 2015


172 Comments

Album Rating: 1.5

enough fucking reviews

Relinquished
March 31st 2015


50089 Comments


"The question remains...who will get the feature first!?"

and i know you're serious about this too lol

Scoot
March 31st 2015


24126 Comments


ehh i am machine is decent

RogueNine
March 31st 2015


6043 Comments


Dev is behind the publishing of four straight Human reviews, I am sure.
Edit: five

MrMatt767
March 31st 2015


559 Comments


Why sososo many D:

Tunaboy45
March 31st 2015


18939 Comments


So glad there's 20 reviews for this, all saying the same thing.
(this is a good review though)

RadicalEd
March 31st 2015


9546 Comments


why is this reviewd 5 times. Do people care about 3daysgrace in 2015?

Shiranui
March 31st 2015


1106 Comments


Coz' it's just like a car crash, you can't look away.

Toondude10
March 31st 2015


15372 Comments

Album Rating: 1.5

where the fuck did these reviews come from?

tempest--
March 31st 2015


20634 Comments


are you fucking serious

http://i.imgur.com/55g2Dtz.jpg

Aftertheascension
March 31st 2015


3564 Comments

Album Rating: 2.5 | Sound Off

ghost negs

Toondude10
March 31st 2015


15372 Comments

Album Rating: 1.5

Thanks Arcade!



I assume that they're from the other reviewers competing for the default review spot :P

tempest--
March 31st 2015


20634 Comments


I hope you guys can one day realise that it's not who is first that matters, but who is best. if you spend more time on your reviews they are bound to be better -- not having a go at the quality of the reviews because I haven't read any of them.



You have to be logged in to post a comment. Login | Create a Profile





STAFF & CONTRIBUTORS // CONTACT US

Bands: A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z


Site Copyright 2005-2023 Sputnikmusic.com
All Album Reviews Displayed With Permission of Authors | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy