Imagine Dragons
Smoke + Mirrors


3.5
great

Review

by Subho USER (8 Reviews)
February 17th, 2015 | 15 replies


Release Date: 2015 | Tracklist

Review Summary: "Smoke + Mirrors" isn't a particularly classic album, but it's not piss poor either.

It’s a strange world we’re living in today. And the music world is even stranger. There exist a million bands that are happy with recycling the same tunes over and over again, but are still loved by their fans. With that, though, come a great number of haters as well. Ideal listeners are always looking for something “new”, and bands that are successfully able to reinvent themselves with each new release are few and far between. But, then, a band like Imagine Dragons comes along, that possesses a lot of talent, but is still discarded by the “ideals” as being just another one of the pack.

While Night Visions was propelled by the massive success of its singles, “It’s Time” and “Demons”, the album had enough promise within itself to make the listeners come back for more. It didn’t have much variety, but it showed that, if the band wanted to, it can really deliver. And that is what they have done with Smoke + Mirrors, their sophomore effort.

The album starts with “Shots”, an upbeat song, which has Imagine Dragons’ signature catchy chorus, but that is where the comparison with their previous songs ends. The song was eventually released as a single, but shows a desire to experiment, and that’s a trait shown throughout the album. It perhaps crams too much into a single piece, but it’s evident that Imagine Dragons weren’t going to be satisfied with their old selves.

“Gold” follows with another upbeat song, but the time signatures are unlike anything you’ll find in general mainstream music. In fact, it’s mainstream in an almost revolting way. It’s the kind of thing that slips through the cracks, all the while quenching your thirst for something new. “Smoke and Mirrors” also boasts of a variable time signature, and while it ultimately falls flat, it’s a laudable attempt at the very least. “I’m So Sorry” is an album highlight, and is elevated by Dan Reynolds’ excellent vocal work.

The 3 preceding tracks keep showing doses of variety displaying Caribbean, Folk and Eastern influences respectively. We then enter the mellow section of the album with “It Comes Back To You” and “Dream” providing a couple of easy listens. The album picks a frenetic pace with “Trouble” and “Summer” – which are two songs that can be loosely related to their previous work - before signaling things out with “Hopeless Opus” and “The Fall”.

Smoke + Mirrors isn’t a particularly classic album, but it’s a very spirited effort nevertheless. With the success that Imagine Dragons had, one would have expected them to rest on their laurels and try to milk the popularity. But, what they’ve shown here is a band that is not afraid to experiment, even when they are at their highest. These songs all have sing-along abilities and can be massively over in a stadium, but sprinkled in between are moments that can only be appreciated if one listens to this on his own.

They could have easily brought out an album that was a virtual photocopy of Night Visions, but they’ve gone for something else entirely, whilst still retaining some of the elements from Album #1 so as to not alienate their fans on a whole. They may have tried to be too smart here, but at least they tried. Let’s not discard a near miss as a complete failure; after all, it’s the effort that matters the most.


Recommended Tracks:

“Shots”
“I’m So Sorry”
“Polaroid”
“Summer”



Recent reviews by this author
The Parlor Mob Cry WolfKongos Lunatic
The Smith Street Band Don't Fuck With Our DreamsSeether Isolate And Medicate
Decyfer Down Scarecrow7Lions Born 2 Run
user ratings (476)
2
poor
other reviews of this album
JamesMarlon (2)
Smoke+Misses...

NordicMindset (1.5)
In order to be considered a sophomore slump, the debut actually has to be good, right?...

TheMoonchild (1.5)
Imagine Dragons have learned absolutely nothing from their past mistakes....



Comments:Add a Comment 
Subho
February 17th 2015


128 Comments

Album Rating: 3.5

Album stream here:



http://mexicoindie.net/2015/02/stream-imagine-dragons-smoke-mirrors/



(Don't expect this one to go over well.)

Tunaboy45
February 17th 2015


18954 Comments


Might want to put the song titles in italics, it makes it easier to read.

TumsFestival
February 17th 2015


2470 Comments

Album Rating: 1.5

kinda reads like a tbt of just the first couple tracks. I wouldn't say the effort put in is the most important part of an album.

Subho
February 17th 2015


128 Comments

Album Rating: 3.5

Might want to put the song titles in italics, it makes it easier to read.




Fixed!



kinda reads like a tbt of just the first couple tracks. I wouldn't say the effort put in is the most important part of an album.




Oh, I only wanted to highlight how they've experimented throughout the album. And the effort put is certainly not the "most important" part of an album, but an appreciable one nonetheless.

trackbytrackreviews
February 17th 2015


3469 Comments

Album Rating: 2.0

"It's not piss poor either"



Average Rating 2.0 Poor

JWT155
February 17th 2015


15039 Comments

Album Rating: 2.5 | Sound Off

Hence the review of him disagreeing with the only 20 or so people who've rated it so far.

JWT155
February 17th 2015


15039 Comments

Album Rating: 2.5 | Sound Off

Well written review, but I disagree with many of your points.



The way you describe Gold it sounds like a 9 minute prog rock epic that the world has never seen before.

Truth is that it's a mediocre pop rock song hinged on the lead singer mumbling Gold a few times in a

bombastic and iambic pentameter-esque flow. Nothing ground breaking.



You also mention a lot of the musical influences on the record, ranging from Caribbean, Folk and Eastern

influences, but sadly they neither excel or dramatize either genre to any effect. The record is so mashed

up that there's very little cohesion and flow.



Finally, you mention that the band is not afraid to experiment. A 3 year old child isn't afraid to

experiment with crayons either but it doesn't glorify the sprawling colors of scribbled lines on the page.

They've mashed together a bunch of sounds and influences but I'd hardly call the combination experimental.



I agree with you that the band gets too much hate and shouldn't be frowned upon so much and that this

record has many enjoyable qualities, but let's not kid ourselves and pretend that Imagine Dragons are

musical masterminds penning the world's greatest and most experimental music of the 21st Century. Contrary

to your beliefs, I consider this Night Visions 2.0 and it's no where near as good.

psandy
February 18th 2015


280 Comments


this is still shit

oisincoleman64
February 18th 2015


2871 Comments


I'm So Sorry had me swinging my hips but that's the most I can say

metalheadrunner
February 18th 2015


343 Comments


Good review, have a pos. I've heard about half the record, I don't detest it, but I'm not overly impressed.

RogueNine
February 18th 2015


6070 Comments


While Night Visions was propelled by the massive success of its singles, “It’s Time” and “Demons”


Surely "Radioactive" should be mentioned here.

Subho
February 18th 2015


128 Comments

Album Rating: 3.5

Well written review, but I disagree with many of your points.



The way you describe Gold it sounds like a 9 minute prog rock epic that the world has never seen before.

Truth is that it's a mediocre pop rock song hinged on the lead singer mumbling Gold a few times in a

bombastic and iambic pentameter-esque flow. Nothing ground breaking.



You also mention a lot of the musical influences on the record, ranging from Caribbean, Folk and Eastern

influences, but sadly they neither excel or dramatize either genre to any effect. The record is so mashed

up that there's very little cohesion and flow.



Finally, you mention that the band is not afraid to experiment. A 3 year old child isn't afraid to

experiment with crayons either but it doesn't glorify the sprawling colors of scribbled lines on the page.

They've mashed together a bunch of sounds and influences but I'd hardly call the combination experimental.



I agree with you that the band gets too much hate and shouldn't be frowned upon so much and that this

record has many enjoyable qualities, but let's not kid ourselves and pretend that Imagine Dragons are

musical masterminds penning the world's greatest and most experimental music of the 21st Century. Contrary

to your beliefs, I consider this Night Visions 2.0 and it's no where near as good.




But, sometimes, a 3 year old child can also create something magical.



And maybe this was just meant to be an innocent experiment? Perhaps they felt the risk was worth taking cuz they have a well established fan base now which will more than likely take what they offer. And, like I said, this isn't a very, very good album. But it's good enough. I liked the variety on offer, and yes, not all the influences clicked, but to be fair, some of them did. I like how they are an open ended band, and most of all, this gave me high hopes for the next album.



ID aren't musical masterminds. But they aren't shabby like others in their league either. They've created an enjoyable album, which might not be everyone's alley, but it doesn't count those who'll like it.





Thanks for the pos, and the great reply! Like me some discussion!

jacobclark512
February 22nd 2015


29 Comments

Album Rating: 1.0

JWT, totally agree with you and agree that ID gets too much hate here.



That being said, this album is worse than their debut by a decent margin. It lacks the hits and substance behind its catchiness. Not quite done with my listen yet, but a 2 seems very likely.

makrand
February 26th 2015


52 Comments


Nicely written subhodas! Pos'd

Subho
March 1st 2015


128 Comments

Album Rating: 3.5

jacob -- I liked how they went outside of the box, and didn't just try to be 'catchy' but implemented many sounds along the way. To each their own, though.



makrand -- Thanks for the pos, man!



You have to be logged in to post a comment. Login | Create a Profile





STAFF & CONTRIBUTORS // CONTACT US

Bands: A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z


Site Copyright 2005-2023 Sputnikmusic.com
All Album Reviews Displayed With Permission of Authors | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy