Taylor Swift
1989


4.0
excellent

Review

by Mall USER (42 Reviews)
January 11th, 2015 | 32 replies


Release Date: 2014 | Tracklist

Review Summary: Faster than the wind, passionate as sin

1989 was the only album of any genre to go platinum last year. What this says about Swift is that not only is she one of the best hit-makers in mainstream music where the single is of utmost importance, but her songwriting finesse is so great that she's able to craft entire albums that sell equally as well. And generally, they live up to the hype.

Well, aside from Red of course. There were a lot of great songs on that album, but as a whole it flopped. It largely eschewed her traditional country epics in favour of pretty lame pop songs equipped with only moderately catchy choruses that desperately tried to save a boring album that sorely lacked Swift's traditional spark.

Luckily, her comeback album has no such faults. Lead single 'Shake It Off' should prove as much, rocking blaring horns and gorgeous harmonies in Swift's increasingly zany vocals. The crunchy beat of this track makes it the unquestionable hit of the record, rivalled only by follow up 'Blank Space', an anthemic pop behemoth that serves as the second helping of a delicious meal of self-deprecation (that will undoubtedly be misinterpreted) alongside its witty music videos.

Elsewhere, things get a bit fluttery and synth-led. 'Wildest Dreams' is a sprawling soundscape that sounds almost nothing like T. Swift until the chorus, evoking Ultraviolence-era Lana Del Rey better than the woman herself. She's never been afraid to borrow from other artists, and the distinctly Chvrches sounding 'Out of the Woods' is evidence enough of this. The typical 'end of relationship' songs she gets mocked for making so often seem to have driven her towards even more lyrical diversity. Far from making 'girl-power' Charli XCX-type songs she paints pictures of relationships (and the breakups that follow) that seem very down to earth with the situation and avoid melodrama.

The production on this album is magnificent, with the contributors serving almost as doting admirers, giving her voice a funky but morose backdrop on 'Style' (which probably steals the title for most infectious hook on the record) and ramming others like 'How You Get the Girl' (which nearly edges it out) choc-full of beautiful acoustic guitars and elaborate percussion. This latter track sound a lot like something from Red in that it spins tales of teenage romance in much the same way, with two lovers caught between making themselves and their partner happy. This is probably the only song here that sounds like it could have been a leftover from a past record, but that makes it no less incredible in its execution.

Though it's been the thing that has saved much of her music from blandness in the past, the chorus actually plays a fairly small part here. For example, 'Welcome to New York' features a rather unexciting one that only drags it down as an effective opener. The lack of country on the song isn't that much of a shock, but hearing something as mundane as this as your first taste of 1989 makes the initial change a little more disappointing. However, the fact that nothing here sounds like 'Love Story' or 'Mine' only shows quite how diverse a musician Swift is.

As a whole, the evolution of an artists talents can never be a bad thing. Sure, there's less memorable tracks here, but I don't think Swift has ever made such a strong set of of tracks as 1989. In a year where pop music of this ilk has been almost entirely absent, I welcome this change just as much as Swift welcomes us to to her world on 1989.



Recent reviews by this author
Rick Ross Hood BillionaireSecret Band Secret Band EP
Converge GravelPitbull Globalization
Touche Amore Touche AmoreLa Dispute Vancouver
user ratings (1170)
3.4
great
other reviews of this album
1 of


Comments:Add a Comment 
Tunaboy45
January 11th 2015


18954 Comments


Good review, enjoyed reading. Have a pos.

Not sure why this is getting such positive feedback compared to her others considering the singles seemed pretty run of the mill (at least to me).

Cygnatti
January 11th 2015


36394 Comments

Album Rating: 3.0

Sweet record [2]

riffariffic7
January 11th 2015


652 Comments


I agree, Tuna. That "Shake It Off" single was terrible IMO. However, all of this positive feedback does give me hope that the rest of the album will be enjoyable (just not sure when I'll give it a listen). Usually pop-artists release their worst track as their single to build up expectations, giving people the sense that, when they listen to it, the album is gold. Great review though, Mall (plus, funny seeing 2 Taylor Swift reviews at the same time; and BOTH are 4 stars, I definitely have to give this album a shot), thumbs up from me.

tempest--
January 11th 2015


20634 Comments


"Usually pop-artists release their worst track as their single to build up expectations"

uh

Gameofmetal
Emeritus
January 11th 2015


12095 Comments

Album Rating: 4.0

nice review, pos'd



still dont' understand how people love shake it off but think welcome to new york is a weaker song but whatever

HalfManHalfAmazing
January 11th 2015


2795 Comments


such a hipster album cover lol

riffariffic7
January 11th 2015


652 Comments


@tempest--: I don't see your confusion. Maybe "pop-artists" was the wrong thing to say, I should have said record labels/producers instead, but it's a perfectly clear statement in my mind. The majority of society is built around averageness, whatever feels familiar gets the most attention, hence why they would pick this song over the rest, because it's about putting haters in their place. I highly doubt a person as popular as Taylor Swift needs to release the greatest song on her album as the single since she's got so many fans who'll just eat up whatever she spits out anyway. She (or they) literally could have chosen ANY OTHER SONG off this as the single and have it be just as successful as the other one would have been, but the decision-makers probably chose this track because of its appeal to the TMZ/tabloid crowds who are always bashing her for simply "dating too many guys".

tempest--
January 11th 2015


20634 Comments


you are so misguided it's not even funny

riffariffic7
January 11th 2015


652 Comments


And you're so bland it's not even funny. You can't even bring yourself to capitalize a letter, let alone use a period, so your aimless words mean nothing to me. You have over 14,000 comments, but not even a single review. You, sir, are a troll.

tempest--
January 11th 2015


20634 Comments


oh i thought this was the internet not my year 11 english essay, my mistake.

jesus christ man, lighten the fuck up.

tommygun
January 11th 2015


27148 Comments


agreed

Cygnatti
January 11th 2015


36394 Comments

Album Rating: 3.0

And you're so bland it's not even funny. You can't even bring yourself to capitalize a letter, let alone use a period, so your aimless words mean nothing to me. You have over 14,000 comments, but not even a single review. You, sir, are a troll.
this has nothing to do with anything. what are you even trying to accomplish?



treeqt.
January 11th 2015


16970 Comments


im died

Tunaboy45
January 11th 2015


18954 Comments


pls no

ChoccyPhilly
January 11th 2015


13693 Comments


"Usually pop-artists release their worst track as their single to build up expectations"

Ridiculous statement

Gameofmetal
Emeritus
January 11th 2015


12095 Comments

Album Rating: 4.0

I would probably agree with everyone else but tempest is kinda mean to me for some reason and the other guy has george rr martin for his pic soooooo



oh wait im not great with capitalization so im friends with neither now

tempest--
January 11th 2015


20634 Comments


i hold no vendettas or anything like that, i'm only mean to people when they write idiotic posts. if i am often talking shit to you, that means that your comments are often garbage.

Lethean
January 11th 2015


1495 Comments


nice

Gameofmetal
Emeritus
January 11th 2015


12095 Comments

Album Rating: 4.0

"i hold no vendettas or anything like that, i'm only mean to people when they write idiotic posts. if i am often talking shit to you, that means that your comments are often garbage."



lmao the time that comes to mind was when i commented on this dudes thrash recommendations list and you promptly said that he shouldn't listen to any band i rec and then shoutboxed me telling me how unmetal i am

Gameofmetal
Emeritus
January 11th 2015


12095 Comments

Album Rating: 4.0

for reals tho i think that was the only time so maybe i don't write that many idiotic posts after all



You have to be logged in to post a comment. Login | Create a Profile





STAFF & CONTRIBUTORS // CONTACT US

Bands: A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z


Site Copyright 2005-2023 Sputnikmusic.com
All Album Reviews Displayed With Permission of Authors | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy