The Mire
Glass Cathedrals


3.5
great

Review

by PistolPete USER (51 Reviews)
July 31st, 2014 | 13 replies


Release Date: 2014 | Tracklist

Review Summary: An exciting debut full-length that brings with it a whirlwind of expectations, most of which are met, and a few that aren’t.

UK post-metal band The Mire is clearly not a band that feels the pressure to mass produce music on a frequent basis, electing to take their time to carefully construct their art. Their first full-length album Glass Cathedrals is a long time coming, but entirely reasonable given that the band’s lineup was still being shuffled around up until 2011 paired with the fact that the members juggle jobs on the side too. Until now, the band had managed on average two songs (not counting interludes) every two years. Not only is that frustrating from the perspective of fans, but it also undoubtedly raised questions as to whether The Mire was capable of scaling their sound up to a full-length whilst keeping their consistency in check. We now have our answer.

First, some background. The band plays a bleak, sludgy post-metal sound that blends both heaviness and melody, effectively creating a smoother, more refined sound than their obvious influences like Isis and Cult of Luna. Their 2010 EP Volume II, a compilation of every song they had produced up to that point, was a shining highlight amidst a genre that had grown quite predictable over the years. Songs like “Shadows” and “The Rift” showcased a culmination of quite a few elements, with a foundation based in sludgy riffs but combined with chiming guitars and beautiful harmonies of harsh and soft vocals, thanks mainly to their stellar vocalist Robin Urbino. Their 2012 split with Chronos softened things up a bit with a more progressive feel inherent within their half of the split. What was most impressive was how comfortable the band sounded in the many sides of their sound, and how well everything blended together.

Where the focus before seemed to be culminating everything together into one neat package, Glass Cathedrals tends to focus more on specific aspects of the band’s sound. The instrumentation is also a bit heavier, often kicking songs off with fast-paced riffs that slice through like machetes. “False Idol”, the first true song of the album, races out of the gates brimming with low-tuned sludge and heavy chugging riffs. The harsh vocals effectively accomplish their task and compliment the sound with a raw and aggressive texture. However, the softer vocals feel as if they are left in the background. They don’t surface much and when they do, they seem to be more of a placeholder as opposed to something adding value like before. On the flipside, tracks like “Triple Gemini” focus more on the softer vocals. The instrumentation here is again powerful and well-paced, but the harsh vocals seem to be what gets forced in without much thought. And that really is the sense of the entire album, most songs work well but the little elements that are neglected take away slightly from the experience and the melodic sound they are trying to go for.

The album does suffer from a bit of monotony as well. As an example, go play the first ten seconds of “False idol”. When you’ve done that, go play the first ten seconds of “Dark Sun”. It’s the same idea but at a faster tempo. Okay, now go play the first ten seconds of closer “Stone Devils”. It’s a slower version of the same thing right? This is where you begin to get the feeling that The Mire might have a smaller bag of tricks than we originally thought; an ominous sign. The title track is one of a select few moments on the album where the band writes something a little more experimental. Otherwise, besides a couple interludes, the album pummels you non-stop, with many songs that do shine but unfortunately a few that seem more like crude blueprints rather than fresh ideas. The title track is a great accomplishment though, a soft and sorrowful ballad with touching vocals that lifts itself into a soaring and emotional finish. I just wish that it didn't get sandwiched between two heavier tracks, which makes it feel more like a brief respite rather than the gem it’s supposed to be.

Don’t think for a second though that Glass Cathedrals is a bad album; it’s worth a listen for any post-metal fan. Almost all the songs funnel immense energy throughout the album, but just lack that sense of culmination and melody that worked so well on their earlier EP and split. There are definitely strong moments here like the mid-section of “Pale Heart” where the band transitions nicely between soft sections and heavier ones with the adept precision you’d come to expect from them. But the monotony does creep in after a while, and makes you wonder whether The Mire might be out of ideas, and that’s really the only thing that keeps this album from becoming something more. This would be very disappointing for a band so early in their career. It took a little over three years to craft this debut full-length album, but the band seems to be caught with its wheel’s spinning rather than building intelligently off of what they've already achieved. Let’s hope that’s not the case.



Recent reviews by this author
Sarin (CAN) You Can’t Go BackBanks III
Suldusk Lunar FallsThe Moth Gatherer Esoteric Oppression
Dead Letter Circus Dead Letter Circus (2018)Toundra Vortex
user ratings (216)
3.9
excellent


Comments:Add a Comment 
PistolPete
July 31st 2014


5326 Comments

Album Rating: 4.0

I feel like all my 3.5 reviews are written the same way :[

a) Introduce the album + background

b) Write a paragraph expressing a painfully mixed opinion

c) Write a negative paragraph

d) Realize you were a bit too harsh on the album and use the concluding paragraph to balance off the

negativity

e) Sum it all up while making sure to remind ppl that while it's good, there's definitely flaws



Fml....

Relinquished
July 31st 2014


50089 Comments

Album Rating: 3.5

yes fuck your life you basic bitch

PistolPete
July 31st 2014


5326 Comments

Album Rating: 4.0

THANK YOU SOMEBODY ACTUALLY UNDERSTANDS



Relinquished, I know you were recommending this to me a long time back but



Vol II > this any day of the week

Relinquished
July 31st 2014


50089 Comments

Album Rating: 3.5

"go play the first ten seconds of “False idol”. When you’ve done that, go play the first ten seconds of “Dark Sun”. It’s the same idea"



it's not though



neg

Relinquished
July 31st 2014


50089 Comments

Album Rating: 3.5

did i? i don't recall. and vol II is too boring for me

PistolPete
July 31st 2014


5326 Comments

Album Rating: 4.0

didn't expect ya too, meh different tastes



any good post-metal to recommend these days though? (not that this is really post-metal)

Relinquished
July 31st 2014


50089 Comments

Album Rating: 3.5

walk through fire - hope is misery



get grushed hard with that

Loveless
July 31st 2014


85 Comments

Album Rating: 4.5

I love this album, but I can see where you're coming from. There isn't enough variety on this album, and the dynamics of the previous EP's are gone. The vocals and melodies were the centre-point to their music before but they now take a back-seat to the heavy instrumentation, which can be a little disappointing if you're a long-time listener. However Glass Cathedrals is almost a completely different beast from their previous material, and if you expect it to be similar to their EP's then you're bound to be disappointed.



I don't think it's particularly fair to compare everything a band or artist does to their previous work, especially if the material is of a similar quality. But I guess it's inevitable with any band given enough releases.

SomeGuyDude
July 31st 2014


377 Comments

Album Rating: 3.5

It's absolutely fair to compare a band's output to their previous work. You get enamoured with a band because you like what they've put out, so when their next album comes out you're all ready to buy it and bang. Different.



I also don't think this is just plain as GOOD at Volume II, even on its own merits.

Loveless
August 1st 2014


85 Comments

Album Rating: 4.5

Double post sorry

Loveless
August 1st 2014


85 Comments

Album Rating: 4.5

I would argue it would constrict creativity entirely for the band to be expected to be held to it's original sound, and past releases shouldn't prevent you from enjoying the music objectively, which is what a good reviewer should be doing in the first place. Even then it's not as if they sound like a different band now and have changed genres, the base elements that make up The Mire are all still there.



Whether the music itself is of the same quality as their previous work is a different argument altogether however. I think if Vol II had of been extended into a full length album it might have suffered from the same lack of variety as on this, it's short length worked in it's favour.

PistolPete
August 1st 2014


5326 Comments

Album Rating: 4.0

You both make fine points, the gist of what I'm getting at here is in past releases, certain things

worked. And when they opted away from what worked and tried something a little different, it didn't

achieve the same enormous heights as before. If my review doesn't read that way though, that's my

fault.



I agree though, Vol II was the perfect length, any longer and we could have had the same issue as

here. The lack of variety definitely holds this down a bit.

DDDeftoneDDD
January 29th 2020


23528 Comments

Album Rating: 4.5 | Sound Off

cool you 4d it after reviewing it at 3.5.

That's the way to do it! The humble way. congrats!



You have to be logged in to post a comment. Login | Create a Profile





STAFF & CONTRIBUTORS // CONTACT US

Bands: A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z


Site Copyright 2005-2023 Sputnikmusic.com
All Album Reviews Displayed With Permission of Authors | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy