5 Seconds of Summer
5 Seconds of Summer


1.0
awful

Review

by Telemarketer USER (2 Reviews)
July 26th, 2014 | 23 replies


Release Date: 2014 | Tracklist

Review Summary: Blandness in its purest form.

Take a moment and ask yourself: What makes music bad to you?
Off-key vocals? Poor instrumentation? Uninspired songwriting?

Though I suppose there is no incorrect (or correct) answer to this question, I have always felt that the greatest sin of music is simply bringing nothing new to the table. As far as I'm concerned, your creativity and artistic style should shine through in your music. Unfortunately, this is becoming less and less common for a couple of reasons. First of all, many modern "artists" are simply untalented and have no creativity. The other the end of the spectrum, though, is far more disturbing to me; when artists sacrifice their artistic integrity to appeal to the largest possible audience.

This brings me to today's subjects, 4 young boys from down under who call themselves 5 Seconds of Summer, or 5SOS. They have actually created quite a large buzz even before the release of their debut album, which is quite a feat as far as I'm concerned.
Well, actually, it would be quite a feat if they had accomplished this in literally any other way possible. To my horror, and the horror of those of us blessed with functioning ears, these fine lads found their way to fame and fortune by posting lame song covers on the Internet, and opening for the worst thing to happen to music since Creed, One Direction.

However, against my greater judgment, I decided to give 5SOS the benefit of the doubt, and sat down to listen to their debut album from start to finish.
About halfway through the first song, I went through sever diabetic shock due to the massive amounts of sugar that I had just been exposed to. This was quite an accomplishment, mind you, because I don't actually have diabetes.

Well, I suppose it's time for me to bite the bullet and actually talk about the damn music.

Easily the most impressive thing about the album is the fact that it manages to provoke absolutely no emotion whatsoever. In fact, I completely forgot I was even listening to music multiple times. As I stated earlier, I can't stand the lack of originality, but this takes it to a whole new level. This is quite possibly the blandest, safest, and most sugar-coated music I have ever had the misfortune of hearing. To be honest, I'm actually quite forgiving when it comes to music that's inherently "bad," as long as it makes an effort to be unique and interesting.

For example, My Chemical Romance's fourth album, "Danger Days," was essentially a disaster musically. However, MCR could have easily just released another "Black Parade" and called it a day; instead, they attempted to branch out and explore a different style of music. Though the album itself was a failure, I can't help but give it a slide, because at least it was a legitimate effort-and legitimate efforts are damn hard to find these days.

Let me make this clear: 5 Seconds of Summer are certainly no My Chemical Romance. And I'm not referring to talent; Hell, every member of 5SOS might be extremely talented as far as I know(though I tend to doubt it), but it certainly doesn't show through in the album. While MCR took a leap of faith, our friends from Australia committed the mortal sin of music, and sacrificed every last bit of their integrity. It's a real pity, too, because 5SOS distinguish themselves from other boy bands by the fact that they actually play instruments. Perhaps if they had cared more about releasing quality music than making quick cash, we might have a half-decent album on our hands.

I feel obligated to at least mention the instrumentation, although there's distressingly little to discuss. Though, as I mentioned, the boys do play their own instruments, they might as well have hired studio musicians; the album is chock-full of the standard 4-chord crap. The vocals, while not "bad" per se, fail to provoke any sort of emotion in the listener, a major shortcoming. Furthermore, the lyrics are so bland and meaningless that they literally could have been performed by any other boy band that has ever existed. The music itself simply lacks identity.

What it all comes to isn't the fact that the album is bad,(because that was to be expected), but that it is simply devoid of anything good. In even the most inherently, obviously awful music, I can usually come up with at least something positive, but this album is the rare exception. While nothing is strikingly terrible, it lacks even a single redeeming quality, and therefore is impossible for me to recommend.

Oh, and don't even get me started on them trying to be "punk rock..."


user ratings (136)
1.8
poor
other reviews of this album
TheMoonchild (2)
The Dairy Queen to One Direction's McDonald's....

ShadyTwist (1.5)
The kings and queens of this new broken scene's debut. Oh, boy....



Comments:Add a Comment 
Telemarketer
July 26th 2014


49 Comments

Album Rating: 1.0

Hooray for ghost negs!

Rice303
July 26th 2014


385 Comments


Not a bad review, I wouldn't say that these guys are quite as terrible as what's stated, but album is definitely a 2 at most. It's really concerning knowing how many fans bands like these have

HolidayKirk
July 26th 2014


1722 Comments


@AaronFullerton: *sees something for which I'm not the target market* "Ha! That's terrible and dumb! Why does it even exist?"

https://twitter.com/aaronfullerton/status/492400196827881472

Telemarketer
July 26th 2014


49 Comments

Album Rating: 1.0

It's irrelevant that I'm not the target. There are plenty of musicians who appeal to a gender and age other than mine who are actually quite talented.



And I was overly harsh with the rating to stress the point that while it's not strikingly horrible, it's completely devoid of anything good.

Calc
July 26th 2014


17478 Comments


"I have always felt that the greatest sin of music is simply bringing nothing new to the table."

4.5 superb:

My Chemical Romance The Black Parade

EddieMarais
July 26th 2014


230 Comments


Burn.

BeneaththeDarkOcean
July 26th 2014


687 Comments


Not much of a burn, The Black Parade's a good, meaningful album.

Jots
Emeritus
July 26th 2014


7584 Comments


Review drags on and on to point out things we already knew. I don't think anyone on sputnik has any illusions of 5SOS being innovative or interesting... I guess you could say this review brings nothing new to the table.

Xar
July 26th 2014


1652 Comments


Yes black parade is cool

Tellthelads
July 26th 2014


84 Comments


Lol, this is not a 1, probs a 2.5 tbh

Telemarketer
July 26th 2014


49 Comments

Album Rating: 1.0

How is the Black Parade unoriginal? It's a quantum leap in quality compared to most charting music.



And yeah, I did get the sense it dragged on a bit too long, but I didn't see anything that I really wanted to take out.

Telemarketer
July 26th 2014


49 Comments

Album Rating: 1.0

Thanks for all the feedback, though. Constructive criticism is always welcome.

HolidayKirk
July 26th 2014


1722 Comments


The reason I point out you not being the target market is because this review demonstrates your complete failure to approach this record with any empathy whatsoever. Throughout history bands like this function as gateways to their influences. Kids that got into Nsync got into their parents Michael Jackson records. What's not new for you might be new for them and there is merit to that.

Furthermore when this review starts sizing up this band to My Chemical Romance it jumps the tracks and never looks back. I get guitars are involved with both groups but the two are not pop conemporaries in any way. If your knowledge of pop is so limited that they're the best comparison you could come up with, you're not qualified to review an album like this.

Telemarketer
July 26th 2014


49 Comments

Album Rating: 1.0

I see your point, but I must disagree. In my eyes, My Chemical Romance is actually a quite similar band in its construction, instrumentation, and even target market to some extent.



Both bands are made up of a group of relatively attractive males who can easily appeal to a younger, predominantly female audience. However, while MCR released somewhat unique work with interesting themes and lyrics, 5SOS instead decided to really numbingly bland music with nothing that even approaches uniqueness.



They are two bands that are similar in quite a few ways, who recorded very different types of music. I'm calling 5SOS out because I feel that there are far better bands that young girls to be introduced to music with. 5SOS are the lowest common denominator, while other bands like Green Day (who I don't even like), are at least putting a bit of effort into their work.

HolidayKirk
July 26th 2014


1722 Comments


On a purely superficial level the comparison works.

But as soon as you start to look deeper it falls apart. MCR is a group created for artistic reasons, the members came
together out of a shared desire to express themselves. They appealed to a female audience but their appeal went way
beyond that.

5 Seconds of Summer is a product. They were assembled by record executives in a boardroom somewhere. Their songs
are written by literal teams of songwriters. 5SOS is being sold directly to girls. This is where the comparison stops
working. It's two groups created for two entirely different reasons in two entirely different musical climates. They are
nothing alike.

That said, "product" alone is not valid criticism. There is still enjoyment that can be had in products (I'm typing on one
right now after all). 5SOS is may copy a feint and a pose from punk rock but that does not mean they are trying to be
punk rock. At all. This is clearly, back to front, a pop band.

Lastly while, yes, there are many bands that could be used as introductions to certain spheres of music those bands are
lame. 5SOS is cool. Will anyone care about them in 2 years? Probably not. But that's fine. Popular music is only
about filling a need in the current moment. It's meant to satisfy and that typically doesn't involve innovation. Not all
music has to innovate. In fact the vast majority of it doesn't. Most music is just trying to do what's been done really well
and that's been true forever.

Jots
Emeritus
July 26th 2014


7584 Comments


Kirk destroyed you... don't even bother

Telemarketer
July 26th 2014


49 Comments

Album Rating: 1.0

I completely understand what you're getting at, and I honestly agree with the vast majority of what

you're saying, but that doesn't change the fact that to someone with even a decent knowledge of

music, it simply can't hold up. Though I understand that I am not the target audience, and perhaps I

didn't make the best comparison in the world, but the fact of the matter is that this is album

simply fails at being anything more than a crappy pop album.



And though I am quite aware that it isn't TRYING to be anything more than a crappy pop album, that

doesn't change the fact that it is a crappy pop album. Whether or not it's "cool" for kids to listen

to, and may introduce them to far superior music, this album in its current state is simply...bad.



Sure, it's hip for the kids to listen to; and sure, I'm not the target audience. But the album is

still a musical failure, and I stand by my rating.



Thanks for the criticism, I really do appreciate you taking the time to critique my review, and I

feel it will help me in the future.

HolidayKirk
July 26th 2014


1722 Comments


More than anything I respect your willingness to listen and respond to critisism. Furthmore, I like this band and I know a thing
or two about music.

godownatall
July 26th 2014


4 Comments

Album Rating: 2.5

As a sixteen year old who loves both pop and punk music, this band was like a dream come true for me - four genuine and

genuinely talented guys who made some really seriously catchy pop rock/pop punk tunes that they wrote by themselves.



Their EPs were so promising - songs like ''Heartache On The Big Screen'', ''Rejects'', ''Wrapped Around Your Finger'' and even

their earlier ''Unpredictable'' and ''Out Of My Limit'' blended pop and rock/punk so perfectly; I would honestly recommend

listening to those songs before you call this band awful, because on those tracks they prove that they aren't that by any

means. Those songs had more of an alternative/rock/punk vibe to it, which like I said was pretty much perfect for me and

showed so much potential. And although it still contains hints of rock and sometimes punk without a doubt, they pretty much

went in the pop direction with their album, which would have been understandable if those songs were so much greater than

their previously mentioned work, but they just aren't, neither lyrically nor musically.



That being said, they weren't put together by label executives; they actually all knew each other from school, started out

playing pubs and bars, opened up for Hot Chelle Rae on an Australian tour and then landed the opening slot for 1D. Which

just makes me wonder whether they would have gone in this musical direction if they hadn't been signed by 1D's

management. (By the way, they don't think they're punk rock. It's an inside joke between them and their fanbase, basically. I

don't know if I can link here but in their Billboard photoshoot they described the album as ''pop rock and punk influenced, but

still a pop album.'' https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HerrnAz7KoQ/)



It makes me sad because they all seem to have a knack for songwriting (because their songs aren't written by a team of

songwriters but by them, although not exclusively; Alex Gaskarth actually wrote on a good portion of the songs on the

album). Which is this album's redeeming factor. Can't deny they can write some pretty solid pop tunes with seriously catchy

choruses. SLSP was written by two of the guys with the help of their producer which I think is pretty amazing, especially

considering how young they all are.



Anyway, I'd recommend listening to some of the deluxe songs - specifically ''Social Casualty'' which is a lot more punk than

anything else on the regular record, ''Independence Day'' which imo sounds like something early ATL could have written, and

there's some pretty good guitar work on ''Greenlight''. Also, their cover of ''What I Like About You'' is pretty great.

godownatall
July 26th 2014


4 Comments

Album Rating: 2.5

Sorry for the way my previous comment looks. I tried to edit it after I submitted it and then the lay-out got fucked up and seemingly impossible to fix.



You have to be logged in to post a comment. Login | Create a Profile





STAFF & CONTRIBUTORS // CONTACT US

Bands: A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z


Site Copyright 2005-2023 Sputnikmusic.com
All Album Reviews Displayed With Permission of Authors | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy