Iron Maiden
Killers


4.0
excellent

Review

by ExplosiveOranges USER (72 Reviews)
July 25th, 2014 | 26 replies


Release Date: 1981 | Tracklist

Review Summary: Not the best work from Maiden's early days, but an essential album nonetheless.

It’s always somewhat strange going back to an older band’s discography and sorting through their first couple releases. Sometimes, the band’s definitive and ultimately significant style was formed within the span of those first few years, such as with Black Sabbath or Led Zeppelin. Other times, the albums are still memorable and fantastic in their own ways, but it’s evident that the band was still experimenting with their sound, and would later refine it into something that would lead them into more critical and commercial success, such as with Judas Priest and Deep Purple. But what about Iron Maiden, the band who had two vocalists, two drummers, and three guitarists between their first four full-length albums? How would their earlier works manage to stack up to their more well-known material? And most of all, could their 1981 album, Killers, trump the infamous sophomore slump?

Fortunately for the fans, the answer to that final question was yes.

Going into the album, a few things become evident immediately. The punk vibe of Iron Maiden is still there, but it has diminished slightly, exemplified by the two instrumentals “Genghis Khan” and “The Ides of March”. However, there aren’t any long epics like “Phantom of the Opera”, and songs like “Wrathchild” showcase the most upbeat, lighthearted side of Iron Maiden. This album also marks the first appearance of guitarist Adrian Smith, whose leads manage to stand out on tracks such as the aforementioned “Wrathchild”, “Purgatory”, and “Murders in the Rue Morgue”. On the rhythm side of things, guitarist Dave Murray and bassist Steve Harris still manage to come up with interesting and smooth-flowing riffs, with Steve’s bass being just loud enough in the mix so that it can act as somewhat of a counterweight to Dave and Adrian’s guitar parts. Clive Burr still manages to steadily support the rest of the band with his drum fills, even providing a brief intro in “Another Life”. However, the standout performance of the album really comes forth in the vocal department, with Paul Di’Anno’s improved style of singing. Despite not having a very large range, Di’Anno’s more aggressive vocal delivery helps to set him apart from more operatic singers such as Rob Halford, and suits the more punk-oriented feel of the music.

In some ways, the album is actually superior to the debut, as it does still very much contain the classic NWOBHM sound, only with a more crisp and clear job in the mixing and production department. And despite having two instrumentals, some of the track runtimes are actually shorter than those on Iron Maiden. Still, the album very much gives off the feel of a young band simply jamming out and generally having a good time, as opposed to later epics such as Powerslave. Sadly, the key flaw of the album is the fact that the songs simply aren’t quite as memorable as those found on Iron Maiden. Of course, tracks like “Wrathchild” and “Murders in the Rue Morgue” are very impressive and rank among some of Maiden’s best songs, but they simply don’t compare when up against tracks such as “Phantom of the Opera” or “Running Free”.

Even if it isn’t a classic album, though, Killers is still an essential album for any Maiden fan, from the diehards to the casuals. And even if you’re not a fan of Iron Maiden’s more popular works such as The Number of the Beast, I would still recommend listening to this album because of both stylistic differences and the fact that it’s quite simply a well-composed, well-put together example of punk-influenced British metal.



Recent reviews by this author
Every Time I Die Low TeensAsking Alexandria The Black
School of Seven Bells SVIIBTextures Phenotype
Fat White Family Songs for Our MothersIntervals The Shape of Colour
user ratings (2922)
4
excellent
other reviews of this album
1 of


Comments:Add a Comment 
ExplosiveOranges
July 25th 2014


4408 Comments

Album Rating: 4.0

First review in a while. Constructive criticism and feedback appreciated.

NeroCorleone80
July 25th 2014


34618 Comments


Saw this and decided to post mine to m/ up this site a bit more

ExplosiveOranges
July 25th 2014


4408 Comments

Album Rating: 4.0

That's the Nero I know and love m/

TheSpirit
Emeritus
July 25th 2014


30304 Comments

Album Rating: 4.5

m/ pos



This is my second favorite maiden, after the s/t.

NeroCorleone80
July 25th 2014


34618 Comments


This is actually prob my least fave of their 80s albums.

ExplosiveOranges
July 25th 2014


4408 Comments

Album Rating: 4.0

[2]

cryptside
July 25th 2014


2406 Comments

Album Rating: 4.5

I auto-pos'd and went back to read it haha. Very nice review, man. One small thing, and it's no big deal:

"And despite having two instrumentals, some of the track runtimes are actually shorter than those on Iron Maiden. And still, the album very much gives off the feel of a young band simply jamming out and generally having a good time, as opposed to later epics such as Powerslave."



Two sentences consecutively start with 'And'; I would just omit the second one because it reads even more naturally.



Awesome job dude.

ExplosiveOranges
July 25th 2014


4408 Comments

Album Rating: 4.0

Will do. Thanks, sig.

Cimnele
July 25th 2014


2527 Comments

Album Rating: 3.0

my fave Maiden

probably plebbin' up the site but what's new

TheNotrap
Staff Reviewer
July 25th 2014


18936 Comments

Album Rating: 4.5 | Sound Off

Pretty nice review, your summary is quite accurate.

menawati
July 25th 2014


16715 Comments

Album Rating: 4.5

Wrathchild dont seem lighthearted to me it's about a angry bastard searching for his father.

DrJohn
July 25th 2014


1041 Comments


Wrathchild dont seem lighthearted to me it's about a angry bastard searching for his father. [2]

Cool album.

insanedrexl1
July 25th 2014


1209 Comments

Album Rating: 5.0

Magnificent album m/

Hovse
July 25th 2014


2740 Comments


This is actually prob my least fave of their 80s albums.[3]

Atari
Staff Reviewer
July 25th 2014


27950 Comments

Album Rating: 3.5

debut is better but this still rules



nice review man

DrJohn
July 25th 2014


1041 Comments


Yeah debut is better...

BMDrummer
July 25th 2014


15096 Comments


Nice review

treefingered2
July 26th 2014


221 Comments

Album Rating: 5.0

cool stuff mate

facupm
July 26th 2014


11850 Comments

Album Rating: 4.0

rules, i like this almost as much as the debut

treefingered2
July 26th 2014


221 Comments

Album Rating: 5.0

better than the debut imo i mean this is perfect



You have to be logged in to post a comment. Login | Create a Profile





STAFF & CONTRIBUTORS // CONTACT US

Bands: A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z


Site Copyright 2005-2023 Sputnikmusic.com
All Album Reviews Displayed With Permission of Authors | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy