Night Verses
Lift Your Existence


3.0
good

Review

by EasyModeDX USER (1 Reviews)
April 23rd, 2014 | 14 replies


Release Date: 2013 | Tracklist

Review Summary: Night Verses pull an incredible debut out of their sleeve but there is a catch...

In this LP Night Verses are:
Douglas Robinson - Vocals
Nick DePirro - Guitar
Reilly Herrera - Bass
Aric Improta - Drums

Doppelgänger by the Fall of Troy always sprouted some intrigue within me. Thomas Erak proved that to make good modern progressive rock you don't need a musical equivalent to rocket science - the flashy songwriting coupled with their engaging approach to instrumentals, and the way the vocals bounced off of this backbone made the show, even though all Thomas was doing was basically saying non sense throughout doppelgänger's entirety. So, can Night Verses make their own sound when using similar ideas as basis for their last full length?

Yes, Night Verses are not another TFOT clone on their debut.

The album starts with Introducing: The Rot Under The Sun, which in combination with Rage clearly display what LYE is all about: the perfect balance between technicality and emotion - the Rot Under The Sun representing the former, shows the album has plenty of solos, and the band make the technical element fit , without sounding like self-indulgent wanking and Rage the latter, by making sure to drill into your mind a stellar energy filled interplay of vocals and guitar. They successfully introduce us the album, yet still work extremely good as standalone songs.

You'll quickly notice how crisp and highly adaptable the production is in the way that it seems to complement these guys' multifaceted approach to loud/quiet dynamics which I like to compare Of Malice And The Magnum Heart by Misery Signals when it comes to the deliverance of the contrast itself coupled to the aforementioned production quality, to the point they sound like a completely different band when alternating between these two modes. When going fast the band most of times has the drums setting the frenetic pace and basically being pretty loud overall with flashy dynamics associated, but flip the switch and effects laded post-rock style guitars take the wheel having the rhythm section following close with tasteful drum patterns courtesy of Aric Importa, through the use of rudiments that seem to enhance the guitars while never becoming slave to the guitarists' will, never stopping short of pumping out those chops, akin to say, Rosetta's more spacey sections. Another thing that impresses me is the ability these guys have to sense context, which is an aspect that Doppelgänger never fulfills. In contrast you can almost take it for granted here. All effects fit, they bring together these contrasting sections with amazing sensibility which is a quality I recon is becoming rare recently albeit talking about bands with a technical emphasis on their sound.

From start to finish the album show Night Verses are thoughtful and self aware when it comes to the instrumentation - knowing their limits, exhibiting a self-realized sound and most of the time having a great grip on their focus - cleverly executed instrumental driven tracks for which the band seems to retrieve ideas from some pocket linked to the 4th dimension, demonstrating an enormous flexibility within the very specific style of songs the album offers. The group also deviates from the standard rock outfit on occasion featuring alternatives such as bongos and integrate them to their style with success.

I would also understand if you thought they wouldn't be able to write a 10 minute closer without falling victim to the pretentiousness crisis most prog bands of today suffer from, yet still accomplished that here without sacrificing their own style. Sure, phoenix I.Rising II. Falling isn't that much of an epic closer, but it doesn't have to sacrifice precious minutes in order to make a worthwhile climax, nor embrace a pointless multitude of instruments which wouldn't really do anything but hurt the overall sound. What it does do is incorporate everything you loved about the album in those minutes without being constrained to the average 4 to 5 minute run time most songs have here.

So there you go, Arin Importa and company found maturation since their Out of The Sky EP, now showing a deliberate and perfected attempt at an original sound, never resorting to gimmicks and showing great examples of consistent songwriting through the 74 minute long effort that doesn't even feel dragged on, or like it has one song too many, which would be an expected problem considering the duration.

HOWEVER (here we go...)

Have you ever experienced anything similar to this?:
You are casually listening to a new album and there are so many aspects that are done right, save for one little cringe worthy thorn that prevents you from wholly enjoying a band's effort - an element that seems to affect the whole experience because at the end of the day, a record is the sum of it's parts, ending up sprouting a bit of a love/hate relationship between the listener and the record at hand. This is the best way I can find of describing how I feel about LYE.

The choruses are awful.

I understand the direction they wanted to take by implementing them in a lot of songs here - they wanted to carry the lyrics' point home, add that bit of accessibility and just help empowering the tracks. But to be honest, most of the time it just falls flat on it's face. Celestial Fires, Parasomnia, Whatever Makes You Hate Me, Blind Lighthouse, Antidepressants all fall victim to these choruses that although originally intended to be straightforward, sound dumbed down instead. This basically means that five out of fourteen tracks suffer from this crux. Trust me on this one, choruses are the equivalent of kryptonite on this LP. Have an example:

Whatever makes you hate me.

Whatever makes you cry.

I'll be the most persistent to know why.

I want to make you hate me.

I want to change your mind.

I'll be the most persistent to know why.

The lyrics quality dips, undeterred by the fact that these weren't even that strong to begin with - make no mistake, if you are planning to listen to Night Verses for their lyrical content you are doing it wrong. But you see, this is just an example which illustrates exactly what I mean - everything that makes the record strong suddenly disappears when a chorus kicks in, the interesting instrumentals included, indeed they turn into half baked attempts of accompanying a broken mechanic. The vocals are overall standard fare for post hardcore, they only stand out when coupled with the sensibility for context I previously talked about which has varying degrees of accomplishment. Usually the instrumental and vocals meld together pretty well but on these isolated situations it seems forced. When it all adds up you'll notice it disrupts any flow the album had drastically, hinders the otherwise slick song writing. Note that the instrumental backing of Whatever Makes You Hate Me is the exception to this since no matter how dumb the lyrics are, it still manages to keep my attention. Then there is Yours which seems to successfully deliver catchyness and make it the central focus of the track without all these problems plaguing it. It's the only attempt that really seems to incorporate this particular element seamlessly to their sound, otherwise it comes close to making the whole thing a trainwreck.

For the most part Lift Your Existence manages to put the listener in a very awkward position - once a chorus kicks in you'll be asking yourself when will it be replaced for the next technical solo or spacey bit, because they fail repeated listens unlike instrumental driven parts. And there are even times where the kryptonite factor makes a second appearance in the same song! I'm left thinking that this would have been a more successful album if the vocals weren't included therefore preventing the songs from being butchered in order to include what can be considered a bane since it does so much to hurt and so little to benefit the songwriting. Sure that would destroy some of the energy the vocals give off, especially in tracks like Rage or Cathexis, but it sounds like a more reasonable price to pay. I'd love an instrumental version of this just to get rid of that persistent smudge.

As it stands though, it's fairly addictive, at least for me yet for the reason I previously mentioned you might feel put off midway through the album. Or you'll be back for more if you can embrace a boring and uninspired way of approaching catchyness.

Either way, this is without a doubt a promising start for a potential filled band.

Highlights:
-Yours
-Altimeter
-Cathexis
-Phoenix I. Rising II. Falling


user ratings (353)
4
excellent


Comments:Add a Comment 
EasyModeDX
April 23rd 2014


140 Comments

Album Rating: 3.0

It's my first album review and as a newbie I'd love to receive some criticism. Not to mention I'm not a native speaker and that's bound to be a decisive factor on weather it has good flow, etc.

IronGiant
April 23rd 2014


1752 Comments


Alright first review, a bit awkward in some places but overall not too bad. To help dispel the wall-of-text problem, try italicizing your band names (album name and either bolding (song title) or "quoting" song titles. Welcome to sputnik man, continue writing and practicing!

IronGiant
April 23rd 2014


1752 Comments


to italicize follow this format: blah blah no spaces though for the real thing, bolding is the sam, just instead of an "i" it's a "b"

IronGiant
April 23rd 2014


1752 Comments


ugh it's not showing up so fuck it, just keep practicing and welcome to the community haha

EasyModeDX
April 23rd 2014


140 Comments

Album Rating: 3.0

Alright, I've taken note, the coding for italics too, (although these kind of things should be fairly obvious from the get go) many thanks Looking forward to write some more, maybe I'll try a shorter one next time for the sake of our fellow users' patience.

Pndi
May 2nd 2014


464 Comments

Album Rating: 3.5

Fucking spot on, I wish I loved this album more than I actually do (I had it at 4.0 because of the excitement at the time but it'd be closer to your score now) because it does have an unique sound and its members are incredible at their instruments. However, a less is more approach would be more appropriate on some songs and yeah, some choruses are so metalcore-like generic they drag the songs. It's really weird because the EP didn't have this problem. On the other side, those older songs weren't written with a singer in mind which means they still have to adapt their sound to the inclusion of vocals. The amount of potential is mindblowing though.

EasyModeDX
May 7th 2014


140 Comments

Album Rating: 3.0

Thanks, maybe the way these choruses are laid out are a throwback to Douglas Robinson's last band

The Sleeping but I'm not too sure since they had some line up changes in the vocal section

throughout the band's history and I've never been very attentive to any of their material to really

spot simillarities.



And you're right on the money, according to an interview the vocals were actually included after the

songs were finished songwriting wise at least in the EP, but I didn't really understand if that

pattern was still the norm here, which was why I avoided mentioning that in the review but if the

modus operandi didn't change since or at least partway, that certainly explains a lot. What I am

sure of from what the interview gave me is that the band's intention here was to have a catchy twist

to some of the songs so they could play that particular selection live to a crowd that had never

heard of them and be able to grab new fans with more ease.



I just wish I had been paying more attention to the comment section here, but I was just thinking

after some days without anything that this wouldn't really be able to spark a discussion and been

busy thinking about what I am going to review next.

ShitsofRain
May 7th 2014


8257 Comments


WHATEVER MAKES YOU HATE ME

EasyModeDX
May 7th 2014


140 Comments

Album Rating: 3.0

Well, I think it would be a waste of good songwriting honestly, once again the chorus section there is bland and devoid of any real purpose, unlike the rest of the song.

EasyModeDX
May 7th 2014


140 Comments

Album Rating: 3.0

"WHATEVER MAKES YOU HATE ME"



This part really makes me hate this band, so I think they accomplished what they wanted in the first

place, 10/10.



Now that I think of it it kinda makes me go WHATEVER MAKES YOU HATE mehhh...

TheSupernatural
July 10th 2014


2213 Comments

Album Rating: 5.0

Whatever Make You Hate Me sounds great to me... but then again, I don't care about lyrics lol

wwf
July 10th 2014


7198 Comments

Album Rating: 4.0

Good review, and you're right about the choruses.



But I think it might go deeper than that just a bit: they got damn near everything right on this album, but unfortunately it really didn't stick with me the way their EP did. I think even though there really isn't a bad song on the album, it could have been made shorter.



Kinda sad because this band really should be my favorite band because their sound when I first discovered it was pretty much exactly in line with how I wanted my own band to sound eventually, but still a pretty promising debut



/soundoff

Scoot
July 10th 2014


22193 Comments

Album Rating: 4.5 | Sound Off

still a beast

decisions
July 11th 2016


1087 Comments

Album Rating: 5.0

Parts of this review are well-written, but I have no idea what you are talking about. The choruses on this album absolutely slay. I have no idea how you could say that the musicianship falters during the choruses unless you just don't like heavy music. The chorus beat in Whatever Makes You Hate Me, for example. Just awesome.



You have to be logged in to post a comment. Login | Create a Profile





STAFF & CONTRIBUTORS // CONTACT US

Bands: A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z


Site Copyright 2005-2023 Sputnikmusic.com
All Album Reviews Displayed With Permission of Authors | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy