Dum Dum Girls
Too True


2.5
average

Review

by humblerodent USER (29 Reviews)
January 28th, 2014 | 8 replies


Release Date: 2014 | Tracklist

Review Summary: "Too true, too true, too true, to be good."

Repetition plays an essential role in music. Without it, listeners get lost and distracted. It magnifies certain points, ingrains patterns into the mind of the audience, and allows for easier recognition. However, too much, and one ends up with an incongruous blob of similar sounds.

On “Too True,” the third studio album from the all-female dream-pop quartet, Dum Dum Girls, repetition is so prevalent that by the end of its short 31 minute run time I was itching to put on something different.

It wasn’t that the music itself was bad -- I found myself bobbing my head and tapping my feet on more than one occasion. Intro song, “Cult of Love,” combined a fast paced drum beat with a guitar riff straight from an old-western gun fight in such a way that I wanted to get up and dance. The bass line reminiscent of Silversun Pickups on “Evil Blooms” and the distorted guitar riff that flared in and out of the upbeat “Little Minx” were pleasant breaks in the monotonous wall of sound that characterized “Too True.”

However, those songs-- coincidentally also the three shortest on the album-- were the exception, not the rule. More common were tracks like first single “Rimbaud Eyes,” which repeats the phrase “You got Rimbaud eyes” 14 times. It takes lead singer Dee Dee Penny six seconds to get that phrase out each time, which means that one minute and 24 seconds of the three and a half minute song is taken up by that one utterance. It’s not the only track with that problem, and it gets old fast.

“Are You Okay?” repeats “You say, ‘Are you okay?’” 12 times; “Too True To Be Good,” repeats the line “too true” an absurd 28 times; and “Under These Hands” -- which sounds surprisingly close to the musical theme for “American Hustle” -- repeats its title at least 17 times.

See how annoying that is?

I could keep counting and chronicling the ridiculous repetition on each song, but it would be a fruitless exercise. The point is that Dum Dum Girls likes to repeat itself. A lot.

Couple that with 31 minutes of bass heavy, Metric-esque, subdued dream pop, in which the song structures rarely progress beyond their initial catchy intro, and you get one boring hodgepodge of great musical ideas that never realize their full potential.

Hopefully, next time around, Dum Dum Girls will be willing to step out of their comfort zone and make some music that doesn’t strictly stick to one sound. Because no matter how good the band is at their brand of restrained pop music -- and they are quite good at it -- too much of the same is never good.

The verdict: Despite a pleasantly catchy underlying sound, too much repetition bogs down and prevents Dum Dum Girls from reaching its true potential.

2.6/5



Recent reviews by this author
Donnie Trumpet and The Social Experiment SurfTwenty One Pilots Blurryface
Surfer Blood 1000 PalmsMumford and Sons Wilder Mind
Modest Mouse Strangers to Ourselvesalt-J This Is All Yours
user ratings (70)
3.2
good
other reviews of this album
Rudy K. EMERITUS (3.5)
True romance....



Comments:Add a Comment 
humblerodent
January 28th 2014


252 Comments

Album Rating: 2.5

Originally published by The Daily of the University of Washington: http://dailyuw.com/archive/2014/01/27/arts-leisure/album-review-%E2%80%98too-true%E2%80%99-dum-dum-girls#.Uuf8gmTTm2w



Starting to post my reviews I do for my college paper here too. My editor said it was fine as long as I attributed it. Anyone

know how to hyperlink within reviews?



Also, would love people's thoughts and constructive criticism so I can grow as a writer.



Thanks!

Brostep
Emeritus
January 28th 2014


4491 Comments


Probably a better idea to put the review's link in the comment section (it's what I did when contribs were allowed to cross-post) but otherwise good review. The super-short newspaper-style paragraphs are a lot less common here than, say, in a newspaper, but it's a good review nonetheless.

HolidayKirk
January 28th 2014


1722 Comments


Don't include the link in the review, place that in your comment. Review looks overall solid. Your "verdict" should be your Review Summary and these paragraphs look a little too broken up (Don't get to say that often) but for the most part a solid effort.

AliW1993
January 28th 2014


7511 Comments

Album Rating: 3.5

I quite like this record, and I've not particularly liked the Dum Dum Girls until now.



Also, what Brostep said.

humblerodent
January 28th 2014


252 Comments

Album Rating: 2.5

Thanks my spookynewghostfriend!



humblerodent
January 28th 2014


252 Comments

Album Rating: 2.5

Although if I can't hyperlink within the review I may just do that anyway.

humblerodent
January 28th 2014


252 Comments

Album Rating: 2.5

I know it didn't apply within the review =[

Worked in the comments though!

humblerodent
January 28th 2014


252 Comments

Album Rating: 2.5

And @holidaykirk

The breakup is normal for newspaper reviews because of the style/how it looks on the page, but its understandable why that might look odd compared to most sputnik reviews



You have to be logged in to post a comment. Login | Create a Profile





STAFF & CONTRIBUTORS // CONTACT US

Bands: A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z


Site Copyright 2005-2023 Sputnikmusic.com
All Album Reviews Displayed With Permission of Authors | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy