Meshuggah
I


2.0
poor

Review

by Epicenter USER (4 Reviews)
June 8th, 2013 | 184 replies


Release Date: 2004 | Tracklist

Review Summary: They are technically outstanding musicians, but weak songwriters.

Meshuggah. They don’t really need much explanation. They’re the ones that originated the djent sound while other bands, such as Periphery, popularize that sound. They’re a band that has influence so many other bands that Devin Townsend had to proclaim that we all rip off them. They’re one of the most beloved bands in metal.

They also made this unorganized mess, “I,” a twenty-one minute song that goes nowhere.

You see, making a twenty-one minute song is an extremely difficult thing to accomplish. Everything needs to flow together damn-near perfectly to keep people interested throughout the whole thing. The band’s songwriting has to be very good to pull it off. It’s not impossible. Bands such as Frost* and Mendel can pull off very impressive 20+ minute songs. They accomplish that by swinging the songs into unexpected directions, adding new ideas into the song as it goes along, and make them flow almost perfectly.

Meshuggah are good at pulling the song in unexpected directions, but there are definitely not good enough at making the song flow well and adding new ideas to it.

You see, Meshuggah has a problem with drawing out songs. Every riff here is draw out to a length that makes you beg for them to hurry up. It doesn’t help that the riffs are mostly comprise of the guitars chugging at odd time signatures. While this is technically impressive, it’s boring. Very boring. The bass generally plays the exact same thing as the rhythm guitarist and render pretty inaudible. When we reach the ambient moment, the guitarists are by themselves and played the same notes for most of it. The second ambient section I want to pay special attention to as the transition between the two riffs there at 14:43 is very awkward. It’s like they finish the song, but then went into completely different song. The flow there is broken almost immediately and was left wondering how they didn’t notice that.

The vocals are, in simple terms, terrible. His tone remains at the same exact tone throughout the whole thing. It’s monotonous to an extreme degree. He’s sort of like the Ben Stein of metal, always shouting in the same exact tone no matter what. The moment where he does something different is where he does this kinda whisper-yell voice, if that makes since. I appreciated that for the full minute it lasted before it went back to the same old yelling.

The drums really don’t do much. I mean, yeah, Haake is very proficient behind the kit, but it’s musically boring. He doesn’t do many different things through the song. He just uses the same beats and changes them up once every few minutes. It’s like AC/DC, only if the drummer decided to do polyrhythms instead. It also doesn’t help that the snare drums just seems off at points and wreck the groove of the song.

Is everything bad about this? Well, not really. For starters, Meshuggah strongest point in every album they do is the lyrics. They are generally awesome and completely kick-ass. Another thing is the fact that some of the grooves here actually work. They just go on for far too long. Also, that intro was entirely unnecessary. It’s like the intro to an album that leads to the next song, not the beginning of a song. The first two minutes could be cut out and not change the song at all.

So overall, is it bad? Yeah. The song goes nowhere, music is generally uninteresting, vocalist is boring, and the song is just generally a mess. But, they have very good lyrics and can get a serious groove going that slightly redeems the song a little. It’s just that the groove is wreck a lot by not very good transitions and the fact that they go on way too long. They are technically outstanding musicians, but weak songwriters.


user ratings (1227)
4.1
excellent
other reviews of this album
1 of


Comments:Add a Comment 
Epicenter
June 8th 2013


287 Comments

Album Rating: 2.0 | Sound Off

Here comes the negs. Ugh. Tell me how the review is please and find mistakes for me that I missed please.

Hoppoman
June 8th 2013


725 Comments

Album Rating: 4.5

IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII disagree with your rating, but the review isn't bad.

Insurrection
June 8th 2013


24856 Comments

Album Rating: 4.0

The vocals are, in simple terms, terrible.



So overall, is it bad? Yeah.




so… tempted… to neg……



but i wont

DirtyDan
June 8th 2013


147 Comments


It’s monotonous to a. extreme degree

Is this supposed to be "an extreme degree"?

I havent heard this but I think I know what it will be like. Good review. pos

Friday13th
June 8th 2013


7624 Comments

Album Rating: 3.0

This really is awful. What's interesting about the polyrhythm concept is it's hard to get right and these guys clearly don't. ChugyChugyChug/////ChugChug///!

FadedSun
June 8th 2013


3199 Comments

Album Rating: 4.0

After Nothing came out, I thought this was the best thing Meshuggah had done in a long time.

Epicenter
June 9th 2013


287 Comments

Album Rating: 2.0 | Sound Off

DirtyDan: Fixed.

BigPleb
June 9th 2013


65808 Comments

Album Rating: 4.5

Haha, wtf is this shit?

slaythesocialists
June 9th 2013


172 Comments


agree with the assessment, but the review is a steaming pile of dog shit

Epicenter
June 9th 2013


287 Comments

Album Rating: 2.0 | Sound Off

Can you tell me why? I want to get better at this.

conesmoke
June 9th 2013


7875 Comments


"They are generally awesome and completely kick-ass"
generic comment, you could maybe mention some of the lyrical subject matter?

"It’s like AC/DC, only if the drummer decided to do polyrhythms instead"
weak and inaccurate argument, no need to reference AC/DC in a meshuggah review man.

"It also doesn’t help that the snare drums just seems off at points and wreck the groove of the song"
The snare drum is placed perfectly, it's just hard to follow if you haven't heard the track a few times already and/or don't bother to try lock onto it with thought.





conesmoke
June 9th 2013


7875 Comments


double post


Epicenter
June 9th 2013


287 Comments

Album Rating: 2.0 | Sound Off

Alright, I'll remember that for my next review.

conesmoke
June 9th 2013


7875 Comments


it's not a bad review by any means man. Maybe review something you like so you can highlight positives, as opposed to pointing out musical ideas that haven't clicked with you (yet) ;)

Epicenter
June 9th 2013


287 Comments

Album Rating: 2.0 | Sound Off

Yeah, I seriously doubt I'll ever like Meshuggah. I still need to check out the rest of their albums, but from what I've heard so far, their name is a pretty apt description since they do virtually the same thing in every song I've heard.

climactic
June 9th 2013


22914 Comments

Album Rating: 3.5

lol

conesmoke
June 9th 2013


7875 Comments


"their name is a pretty apt description since they do virtually the same thing in every song I've heard"

well... you say that, and it may seem that way... But, you're soo wrong.

MO
June 9th 2013


24240 Comments

Album Rating: 4.5

yea Haake is very proficient behind the song he doesn't play, its like you know this so well you had to review it!



" For starters, Meshuggah strongest point in every album they do is the lyrics."



bullshit

Epicenter
June 9th 2013


287 Comments

Album Rating: 2.0 | Sound Off

I guess we'll see.



Also, who neg me and didn't give reasons why? I'm trying to get better at this. The least you can do is give me some advice on how to write better reviews.

conesmoke
June 9th 2013


7875 Comments


review a sound you're more familiar with bruthaaaaaaaa.



You have to be logged in to post a comment. Login | Create a Profile





STAFF & CONTRIBUTORS // CONTACT US

Bands: A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z


Site Copyright 2005-2023 Sputnikmusic.com
All Album Reviews Displayed With Permission of Authors | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy