Six Feet Under
Unborn


2.5
average

Review

by Pon EMERITUS
March 19th, 2013 | 16 replies


Release Date: 2013 | Tracklist

Review Summary: So-so band release a so-so album

To be frank, Six Feet Under have been trotting down the path of monotony since their inception, consistently releasing poor to average albums every few years or so. The issue they face after what is now 20 years since Chris Barnes’ founded the project, is that after a run of consistently unremarkable hogwash, they barely even register of the radar anymore. Sure, in terms of commercial success, these guys are up there with some of the best, but their lack of artistic relevance in today’s death metal scene couldn’t be overstated. Unborn shows a band attempting to correct their misdeeds, but at this point, it’s apparent that they lack both inspiration and ability.

Unborn consists of a multitude of death metal clichés, including but not limited to juvenile lyrics and inaudible bass. Jeff Hughell’s performance, when it can be heard, comes across as rather pedestrian, blending in with the guitars as if he weren’t even there. The drumming follows in the same vein as the bass work, while competent, it does little more than provide an obligatory rhythmic backdrop, recycling patterns and fills with irritating regularity. The strongpoint of the album is the groove-soaked mid-tempo riffing of Steve Swanson and Ola Englund. Their musicianship will hardly set the world alight, but the riffs are undeniably catchy and have some hefty staying power, sometimes trickling back into your head hours after the album has ended. Unfortunately, Chris Barnes’ vocals drag the whole experience down a notch. Lacking in range, audibility and projection, Barnes’ performance is - to put it bluntly - quite dull. For almost the entire album, Chris spits a barely decipherable mush of forced low-register growls, baring no resemblance to the delivery that characterised his Cannibal Corpse days.

While the individual performances of the musicians aren’t exactly spectacular, they at least appear to have recognised their strengths and mixed the guitars significantly higher than anything else. This devotion to the guitars basically relegates the performances of the other members to being part of an unobtrusive backdrop. They provide neat little aesthetic touches to the overall sound, but aren’t distracting, nor do they feel out of place. Being Six Feet Under, the song-writing on display here is obviously formulaic, but it works for the most. Most of the tracks are surprisingly easy to distinguish despite a lot of them appearing identical in terms of composition. Across the album, the riffs are diverse enough set individual tracks apart with relative ease, and due to said composition, the album is very consistent in a thematic sense. Sure, it is the standard verse-chorus affair we’ve all heard a million times before, but the strength of the riffs themselves and the simplicity of their implementation do make for a relatively enjoyable listen, if taken a song at a time.

Unborn is obviously not going to change the opinions of purists or vigilant detractors of this band. In fact, at this point, I don’t think Six Feet Under are ever going to release something that genuinely defies expectations as a maligned act within the death metal community. It may be too late to undo the damage done by their previous output, but at least these guys have appeared to make an effort on Unborn.



Recent reviews by this author
Ad Nauseam Imperative Imperceptible ImpulseUlcerate Stare Into Death and Be Still
Sweven (SWE) The Eternal ResonanceBeneath the Massacre Fearmonger
Grave Infestation Infesticide (demo)Obliteration Cenotaph Obscure
user ratings (89)
2.8
good
other reviews of this album
Robert Garland STAFF (3)
Same old Six Feet Under, with a couple of friends....



Comments:Add a Comment 
Gnocchi
Staff Reviewer
March 19th 2013


18256 Comments

Album Rating: 2.0

Dammit, i was going to be the first on this, with exactly the same rating.

BassDemon333
March 19th 2013


3435 Comments

Album Rating: 2.5

Good review. I didn't like this as much as Undead. Rob Arnold should have contributed more, hes a good part of what made that album actually decent.

Gnocchi
Staff Reviewer
March 19th 2013


18256 Comments

Album Rating: 2.0

Been writing for a coupke of weeks now, and from the jist of your review compared to mine, this has very littlelasting value.

Atari
Staff Reviewer
March 19th 2013


27950 Comments


nice revew you should do grave - into the grave next lol

Atari
Staff Reviewer
March 19th 2013


27950 Comments


I'm not worried I just think you'd be a good writer for the job. I pos'd by the way ;)

necroscope86
March 19th 2013


213 Comments


Good review, "Undead" was the only album I heard from Six Feet Under and even that was disappointing given that many said it was a good place to start. One thing worth noting is that they are not below "the radar" at all, their albums still sell among the best in the genre which is why they are something like the eighth best selling death metal act. This is coming from someone who knows nothing about death metal at all and has only heard some of the bands that were actually big in the mid-1990's and a few albums here and there.

necroscope86
March 19th 2013


213 Comments


That's true except for a band like Cannibal Corpse who sold 2 million units and yet have little relevance given that their albums are all boring and the same over and over again aside from 1 or 2 tracks and they just do not know when to quit.

Topaz
March 19th 2013


325 Comments


These guys are shitheads

Pterazord13
March 19th 2013


4 Comments

Album Rating: 4.0

I think it's one of their strongest releases. It's not as good as Undead, though. It totally destroys their previous work.

Madbutcher3
March 19th 2013


3143 Comments

Album Rating: 2.5

better than their other albums (not that hard) but still pretty bleh.

KILL
March 19th 2013


81580 Comments


their first records their best

FrozenVain
March 19th 2013


3043 Comments


Great work, Jac (pos) I fucking love the album cover for this so I'm going to listen to it anyway, but I actually thought Undead was good so I dunno. How would you rate undead (If you have heard it), Jac?

necroscope86
March 20th 2013


213 Comments


"Undead" was alright but there was nothing that stood out about it. Six Feet Under are just a band that makes death metal, they do nothing unique with the genre and their riffs are over-played to the point of stagnancy.

FrozenVain
March 20th 2013


3043 Comments


prob some faggot SFU fanboys that ghost negged.

...but who the fuck is a SFU fanboy?

FrozenVain
March 20th 2013


3043 Comments


agreed

TalonsOfFire
Emeritus
May 22nd 2015


20969 Comments

Album Rating: 2.7

This is definitely their best in years, the guest artists made a big difference with the songwriting choices I'd imagine.



You have to be logged in to post a comment. Login | Create a Profile





STAFF & CONTRIBUTORS // CONTACT US

Bands: A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z


Site Copyright 2005-2023 Sputnikmusic.com
All Album Reviews Displayed With Permission of Authors | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy