Mumford and Sons
Babel


3.0
good

Review

by gslasor USER (1 Reviews)
October 1st, 2012 | 3 replies


Release Date: 2012 | Tracklist

Review Summary: I Will Wait for the next one.

I'll admit I was optimistic to say the least for the arrival of Mumford and Sons' latest LP Babel, being a fan of their ale-soaked brand of folk rock. Their debut, Sigh No More was impressive but somewhat monotonous, albeit a great achievement. To see a band playing this style of music achieve the popularity that Mumford did is still somewhat staggering, and, I'll admit, not exactly warranted. Sure, the band is fresh and exciting, executing such anthemic cuts as "The Cave" and "Little Lion Man" with a catchy pop flair that has yet to be accomplished by another act. However, the act's strongest cuts have always been of the low-key, searching variety - take "Winter Winds" (a bit of a stretch - but the horn solo makes it) or "I Gave You All", songs on which the band reach an emotional depth unheard of by any of their contemporaries (that is, if they even have any).

Unfortunately, the band seems to disagree. Babel begins on a strong note with the title track opener - a savage maelstrom of acoustic guitars that simply explodes towards the end in some sort of folk version of a breakdown. Unfortunately, the band follows up with 3 more tracks of exactly the same variety - including the extraordinarily boring lead single "I Will Wait". The relentless barrage of rolling acoustic savagery makes "Ghosts That We Knew" particularly effective as a respite, but alas, the band simply rears its head and plunges headlong into another set of tunes that begin deceptively calm before building up into the same exact song you've now heard 5 times. The loud-quiet dynamic play worked for Led Zeppelin, but that's because there was actual black and white, not an endless sea of grey fist-pumping folk anthems. The unfortunately two-minute-long "Reminder" that follows is the album's strongest moment, where Marcus Mumford attempts to be Nick Drake and nearly succeeds, hindered only by his seemingly perpetual roughness.

The following track, "Hopeless Wanderer" is where the band actually succeeds at their apparently stock-in-trade. Featuring (Electric!) guitar and a structure almost reminiscent of prog-rock, the song is Mumford at their best. "Broken Crown" is similarly powerful and unnervingly dark, but unfortunately by this point (nearly 40 minutes in), I've simply had enough.

Therein lies the problem with Babel. It isn't a BAD album. The problem is that the novelty has worn off. On Sigh No More this level of monotony was acceptable, Mumford still had their niche and certain bouts of imperfection can be ignored on a debut. Not on a sophomore. With a bit of the fat trimmed, there's no doubt Mumford has a good album here, but as it is, it suffers the same affliction that its lead single did.


user ratings (690)
2.7
average
other reviews of this album
Knott- EMERITUS (1)
I'd like to tell you a story....

Sowing STAFF (3)
Mumford & Sons deliver Sigh No More Pt. II...

SingForTheDead (2.5)
Is the sophomore slump just superstition? Sadly (for some), in Mumford & Sons' case it isn't....

GiantMan (3)
“Fingers tap into what we were once.”...



Comments:Add a Comment 
Aids
October 1st 2012


24509 Comments

Album Rating: 3.0 | Sound Off

hmm i like what you wrote here. i actually agree with this review the most out of all of them so far.

TheSupernatural
October 1st 2012


2213 Comments


DAT SUMMARY

EyesHalfClosed
October 1st 2012


57 Comments


Solid review, I'm curious to check this one out.



You have to be logged in to post a comment. Login | Create a Profile





STAFF & CONTRIBUTORS // CONTACT US

Bands: A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z


Site Copyright 2005-2023 Sputnikmusic.com
All Album Reviews Displayed With Permission of Authors | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy