Threat Signal
Threat Signal


2.0
poor

Review

by CJISASKANK USER (2 Reviews)
October 12th, 2011 | 7 replies


Release Date: 2011 | Tracklist

Review Summary: The Most Uninspiring Album This Year.

In 2006, Nuclear Blast and Threat Signal gave Metalheads around the globe an album to be excited about - 'Under Reprisal'. An album that incorporated both the technical and melodic aspects of groove-oriented death metal in almost perfect balance. Songs such as 'As I Destruct' and 'Counterbalance' deserve masterpiece status alone for the sheer journey through aggressive and atmospheric dynamics that the music takes the listener.

As well as fantastic songs, the album as had a very unique production, keeping a lot of the higher frequencies in the mix, which emphasised singer Jon Howard's unique high pitch scream and the crunch of the guitars riffs - sounds that were instantly recognisable to Threat Signal.

However, since that point, things have simply disintegrated to the point were they have released one of the most uninspiring albums I have ever heard in the twelve years I have loved Metal music. It is worth noting that very quickly that after the release of 'Under Reprisal', every member of the band except singer, Jon Howard, left to focus on their own personal issues and the following months were used to find replacements for upcoming tours.

With a line up seemingly sorted, the band released their second album - 'Vigilance', and as soon as you put it on, you realised that the new members and new production team(the band themselves instead of Christian Olde Wolbers of Fear Factory) had created a new sound for Threat Signal that seemed more thrash metal oriented and lacked much of what we had become accustomed to as the 'Threat Signal sound'.

I realise I have not mentioned the album I am reviewing, but I felt this introduction necessary, as it puts everything from this point on in context. So here we go.

I found out last week that there was a new Threat Signal album, so without any hesitation I found the album online and gave it a listen.

The first thing I noticed straight away was that the production on the album is very clean and clinical, normally a good thing, but I found it suffocating and lacking of any emotion that you should get from a song this aggressive. The reason for this production is possibly due to the artistic direction the band seem to have taken themselves.

For starters, this album is A LOT more Tech Death Metal than any previous Threat Signal album, reminding me of the new Cryptopsy sound. If you love that sound then you will like this album, but the fact is that new members and production have lead this band into the same trap that lot of bands fell into with the explosion of 'Deathcore', trying to emulate bands such as 'Despised Icon', 'Job For A Cowboy, 'The Red Chord' - who all received huge success in a very short space of time. The irony here being that, the 'Deathcore' scene is not as popular as it used to be.

Apart from the first track, 'Uncensored', which wil grab your attention straight away for its..'wtf is this Threat Signal' factor, you could play the entire album without even realising that you were changing tracks. Each song has the same layout:

1) Mediocre, not very memorable riff
2) Same time/groove/feel
3) Emotionless guitar solo( if you loved the first album, you will notice this the most)

In summary, the fact that this bands first album was so good, always meant that they were going to find it hard to repeat such a refreshing album. The fact of the matter that in finding new band members and a new sound, they have ended up losing all the elements that people found most endearing about their music. Lets hope they get back on the wagon because another bad album could seriously finish this band.


user ratings (96)
3
good
other reviews of this album
Robert Garland STAFF (2.5)
Threat Signal is now but a shadow of their former selves....

related reviews

Under Reprisal

Vigilance


Comments:Add a Comment 
CJISASKANK
October 12th 2011


3 Comments

Album Rating: 2.0

few typos guys, sorry x

Scoot
October 12th 2011


22193 Comments

Album Rating: 2.0 | Sound Off

band is long dead

linchpin313
October 12th 2011


830 Comments

Album Rating: 3.0

Apart from the singer, its a completely different line-up from the debut... bound to sound different... album's not that bad, better than Vigilance that's for damn sure.

KILL
October 12th 2011


81580 Comments


band sucks yea

Gnocchi
Staff Reviewer
October 12th 2011


18256 Comments

Album Rating: 2.0

I know you already stated it but you didn't really review the album at all. When you do actually start to, it looks more like a soundoff. But i agree band is going straight down.

TheSpirit
Emeritus
October 12th 2011


30304 Comments


band has always sucked

RenegaDrifter
October 12th 2011


273 Comments

Album Rating: 3.5 | Sound Off

That was an "uninspiring" review.



Better yet I find it amusing how much hate/dislike these guys are getting in general. I mean sure its

not like a band like Cave In where we expect something different every album and they deliver, or ABR

where we aren't even sure if they even like the genre of music they are supposed to be making. I

stumbled upon Vigilance before Under Reprisal and that's how I got into these guys and honestly I'd

put them in my top ten.



I've also been craving some really heavy stuff lately and when certain bands let me down Ordinance and

Threat Signal made my day so while I may be more forgiving I do actually like this.



You have to be logged in to post a comment. Login | Create a Profile





STAFF & CONTRIBUTORS // CONTACT US

Bands: A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z


Site Copyright 2005-2023 Sputnikmusic.com
All Album Reviews Displayed With Permission of Authors | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy