Cold Driven
Set In Stone


3.5
great

Review

by Robert Garland STAFF
July 10th, 2011 | 25 replies


Release Date: 2005 | Tracklist

Review Summary: This Canadian five piece show they know how to make a solid effort but do not have the ‘wow factor’ that would push them to the hard rock heights.

First up, Cold Driven is:
• Billy Nickell – vocals
• Dennis Nickell – vocals/bass
• Ben Bouthillier – guitar
• Shane Bouthillier – guitar
• Jeremy McLachlan – drums

Debuting with ‘Set In Stone’ Cold Driven express their musical ideas in a manner that can be catchy, but at the same time uninteresting, lacking any special ‘wow factor’. The album can be described as melodic, heavy (more in a hard rock sense than heavy metal) and also includes some synth features. These self-learned musicians bring a diverse amount of influence to the music they produce. Influences can be heard from most notably the hard rock genre but also includes some electronica sections and progressive rock features.

After a short introductory passage the album leads into ‘Breaking Condemnation’ which on a first listen draws to attention what the entire record sounds like: that is the mix of melodic, heavy and electronic sound sources including that of a bell, that tastefully ends the rhythmic pattern during the song. The music at times can be as catchy as most other modern rock groups. Drawing the listener in and getting feet tapping. This can be attributed to the clever rhyming patterns and examples of the patterns are found in tracks ‘Breaking Condemnation’ and ‘In Stone’. Other elements of the band’s instrumentation also reinforce this. Mainly in the rhythm section that backs up the vocal phrasings. The riff patterns are tight ‘chug-styled’ chords usually timed with the drum’s double bass work in a series of triplet patterns or straight patterns. The vocals are a mix of your everyday typical clean rock vocals, coarser passages, nasal country cleans (found on ‘Slipping Away’) and screams all around the middle register, the screams being a touch deeper.

What lets the debut album down is that it’s over consistent. Where Set In Stone is fairly balanced it becomes too much of the same thing. This coupled with some timing issues that are found where Cold Driven adds melodic leads and passages. While these are some pretty key issues, they don’t take too much away from the record. Let’s face it all debut albums have flaws and listeners don’t expect much from the modern rock scene.

Whilst listeners don’t focus too hard on the music, they should find this pretty enjoyable although slightly boring. With highlights such as ‘Breaking Condemnation’, ‘Bittersweet Casualty’ and ‘In Stone’. Listeners should be able to achieve some playback value and a little more enjoyment from the Canadian rock scene. Rather than being disappointed by the same rock band over and over again.



Recent reviews by this author
Cognizance PhantazeinSarmat Determined To Strike
Thy Catafalque AlföldEsoctrilihum Astraal Constellations of the Majickal Zodiac
Blindfolded and Led to the Woods Rejecting ObliterationImpetuous Ritual Iniquitous Barbarik Synthesis
user ratings (1)
4
excellent


Comments:Add a Comment 
Gnocchi
Staff Reviewer
July 11th 2011


18256 Comments


Not actually that big on the Canadian Hard Rock scene.
I got hooked.Thoughts?

WashboardSuds
July 11th 2011


5101 Comments


I'll have to give this a listen

WashboardSuds
July 11th 2011


5101 Comments


I'd merge a couple of sentences in the last paragraph but a solid review nonetheless

Gnocchi
Staff Reviewer
July 11th 2011


18256 Comments


Cheers, solid is good!

AfterTheBreakdown
July 11th 2011


7245 Comments


Good review as always pos'd bro.

Gnocchi
Staff Reviewer
July 11th 2011


18256 Comments


Cheers champ, this is one i have been wanting to do for a while.

sifFlammable
July 11th 2011


2741 Comments


shudnt use that 'wow factor' phrase in the review aswell man

Gnocchi
Staff Reviewer
July 11th 2011


18256 Comments


noted.

Blindsided
July 11th 2011


1871 Comments


Album titles should be in italics not quotations.

TheSpirit
Emeritus
July 11th 2011


30304 Comments


Your first paragraph gets a little redundent stating how its heavily influenced by hard rock twice and to be honest while that intro paragraph shows you actually have improved, it still doesn't really have any kind of hook to really get someone interested in reading further. I haven't read the rest yet because I'm on from my phone and that's a hassle but ill read it when I get home.

Gnocchi
Staff Reviewer
July 11th 2011


18256 Comments


I haven't read the rest yet because I'm on from my phone and that's a hassle but ill read it when I get home.

@Spirit, i need to learn that still, thanks for the eventual look over.

"Album titles should be in italics not quotations."

I never have used those techniques and as such don't know the coding etc. If any one can put them up here it would be much appreciated.





TheSpirit
Emeritus
July 11th 2011


30304 Comments


Overall this is definitely one of your better reviews man. A little vague in places but you're actually presenting your ideas coherently this time around which was a big problem with your previous. I can definitely see you getting a lot better as you do more in this style. Pos.

Gnocchi
Staff Reviewer
July 11th 2011


18256 Comments


Thanks Spirit, just help me out here and point out the 'vague' spots. See if i can improve on this.

TheSpirit
Emeritus
July 11th 2011


30304 Comments


The music at times can be as catchy as most other modern rock groups. Drawing the listener in and getting feet tapping.


For the first sentence maybe try to compare it a specific band(s) so we can get a more solidified idea of how they sound. Second sentence is a fragment.

Gnocchi
Staff Reviewer
July 11th 2011


18256 Comments


So i need to maybe list and expand. Cheers Spirit.

dimsim3478
July 11th 2011


8987 Comments


Pos'd. Thanks for the rec'. Checking this out now.

EDIT: It's pretty epic. Solid material.

Gnocchi
Staff Reviewer
July 11th 2011


18256 Comments


Glad i could actually find something you like. But i don't think 'epic' is quite the word.

Sowing
Moderator
July 11th 2011


43943 Comments


Debuting with ‘Set In Stone’ Cold Driven express their musical ideas in a manner that can be catchy, but at the same time uninteresting, lacking any special ‘wow factor’.


-Put a comma after 'Set In Stone'
-To me, the word uninteresting seems to contradict the fact that it is catchy. Maybe pick an adjective that is more specific

The album can be described as melodic, heavy (more in a hard rock sense than heavy metal) and also includes some synth features.


-you forgot to include the subject of your sentence: and it also includes some synth features

These self-learned musicians bring a diverse amount of influence to the music they produce.


-to me, it seems redundant to say that musicians produce music

Influences can be heard from most notably the hard rock genre but also includes some electronica sections and progressive rock features.


-put a comma in there between genre and but

After a short introductory passage the album leads into ‘Breaking Condemnation’ which on a first listen draws to attention what the entire record sounds like: that is the mix of melodic, heavy and electronic sound sources including that of a bell, that tastefully ends the rhythmic pattern during the song.


-put a comma in between 'Condemnation' and 'which'
-replace "that is" with "a", remove the "and"
-change including that of a bell, that tastefully ends the rhythmic pattern during the song to read "including a bell that tastefully ends the song's rhythmic pattern"

Drawing the listener in and getting feet tapping.


-Fragment. Consider revising.

This can be attributed to the clever rhyming patterns and examples of the patterns are found in tracks ‘Breaking Condemnation’ and ‘In Stone’.


-Change to This can be attributed to the clever rhyming patterns, examples of which can be found in ‘Breaking Condemnation’ and ‘In Stone.’







Sowing
Moderator
July 11th 2011


43943 Comments


Mainly in the rhythm section that backs up the vocal phrasings.


-fragment, consider revising
The riff patterns are tight ‘chug-styled’ chords usually timed with the drum’s double bass work in a series of triplet patterns or straight patterns.


-good descritpion, but a comma between "chords" and "usually" would go a long way in making it read better

The vocals are a mix of your everyday typical clean rock vocals, coarser passages, nasal country cleans (found on ‘Slipping Away’) and screams all around the middle register, the screams being a touch deeper.


-"everyday" and "typical" mean the same thing, get rid of one of them
-get rid of "the screams being much deeper"

over consistent


-"unvaried", "overly constistent", something like that would sound better i think

Where Set In Stone is fairly balanced it becomes too much of the same thing.


-I would have written: While Set In Stone can be fairly balanced, it tends to wear on the listener after a while, rehashing the same ideas again and again.

This coupled with some timing issues that are found where Cold Driven adds melodic leads and passages.


-I think what you were trying to say is In addition, that problem is compounded by timing issues during melodic leads and passages.


Sowing
Moderator
July 11th 2011


43943 Comments


Let’s face it all debut albums have flaws and listeners don’t expect much from the modern rock scene.


-Just get rid of this. It goes without saying that all albums, let alone debuts, have flaws. And there is no need to generalize everyone's thoughts on a specific genre.

Whilst listeners don’t focus too hard on the music, they should find this pretty enjoyable although slightly boring.


-maybe it's just me, but a good old "while" sounds just as good or better than "whilst" here

With highlights such as ‘Breaking Condemnation’, ‘Bittersweet Casualty’ and ‘In Stone’. Listeners should be able to achieve some playback value and a little more enjoyment from the Canadian rock scene.


-merge these two sentences with a comma in place of the period

Rather than being disappointed by the same rock band over and over again.


-delete

------------

I know I tore this to pieces, but this is honestly one of your better works. The descriptions were detailed, and I got a good idea of what to expect from the album. But I'll be damned if your grammar isn't horribly awkward. If you cleaned that up and just developed a better sense of how to put things, you could be a very good reviewer. As is though, this is no more than a slightly above average review. It is just too much of a hassle to sort through all of your mistakes, and my bet is that the casual reader won't.

C +

I know you have an A in you. Let's see another review like this that is free of grammar and punctuation errors.




You have to be logged in to post a comment. Login | Create a Profile





STAFF & CONTRIBUTORS // CONTACT US

Bands: A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z


Site Copyright 2005-2023 Sputnikmusic.com
All Album Reviews Displayed With Permission of Authors | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy