Owl City
All Things Bright And Beautiful


1.0
awful

Review

by danielsfrebirth USER (27 Reviews)
June 17th, 2011 | 7 replies


Release Date: 2011 | Tracklist

Review Summary: This album does seem better than its predecessor, even though it isn't. But why? Maybe I’ve become so used to Owl City’s music that there’s nothing new or shocking about just how bad it is.

I was actually looking forward to this album, if only to give it a scathing review. Since I first discovered Adam Young’s music in 2009, shortly before the single “Fireflies” and album Ocean Eyes became massive sleeper hits, I have felt an intense dislike and disgust for Young’s music and aesthetic. Though this was only exacerbated after a listen to Young’s latest release All Things Bright and Beautiful, I have found myself actually incapable of writing the historic trash piece I expected to drop on this album. This album, though it is no less abysmal than Ocean Eyes, does seem better than its predecessor. But why? Is it because I’ve heard it all before? Is it because All Things Bright And Beautiful is actually more mediocre than awful, though it is both? Or maybe I’ve become so used to Owl City’s music that there’s nothing new or shocking about just how bad it is?

One key reason may be its stylistic diversity. While the tracks on Ocean Eyes stuck to one stylistic formula (monophonic synths, overpronounced vocals, mock-IDM beats--in other words the Postal Service on Prozac), Young explores a number of different genres on All Things. “Honey and the Bee” flirts with country; “Alligator Sky” is a bizarre foray into B.o.B-style cuddle rap; “Deer in the Headlights” is almost arena rock; “Galaxies” is an almost queer-sounding club-pop tune. Unsurprisingly (and sadistically satisfyingly), all these attempts at stylistic exploration fall flat on their faces. “Alligator Sky,” which has rapper Shawn Chrystopher rattling off verses as vapid as Young’s lyrics, is particularly insufferable (worst second and a half: the part of the chorus where Chrystopher intones “in-the-al-li-ga-tor-sky” in the background).

Another key difference between the two albums is its scale. While Ocean Eyes solidly felt like the work of one person recording in some empty basement somewhere in Middle America, All Things sounds like it just could be the work of a collective of musicians. Though the minimalism of Ocean Eyes carries over on some songs (“The Real World,” which will likely be this album’s hit due to its similarity to “Fireflies”), songs like “Deer in the Headlights” or “Plant Life” simply feel too grand to be the product of one insomniac’s brain. Perhaps the large scale of the music serves to distract the listener somewhat from Young’s lyrics, which are as mindlessly vapid and painfully nonsensical as ever but are no longer front and center.

Yet perhaps the main thing that makes All Things seem so much better than Ocean Eyes is the fact that it is, indeed, the new Owl City album. A little-known fact about Owl City is that it is only one of several dozen projects in which Young is evolved, each one with its own name and clear-cut sound. If Young wanted to make anything drastically different or better than the four albums he has cut under this particular name (which happened to get the most attention), he would likely release it under a different moniker. Who knows, he may be releasing a masterpiece under another name as we speak. But Owl City is the project that sells hundreds of thousands of records, had a hit single, and is being followed by millions and millions. It is thus the one we will stick with for however long, and Young will likely continue to make records of the same abysmal quality as his previous ones. By his next album, just how atrocious this music is may not seem so shocking anymore. When will we get used to it? Probably never.



Recent reviews by this author
John Lennon Rock 'n' RollI-LP-O In Dub Communist Dub
Erykah Badu New Amerykah Part Two: Return of the AnkhThe Residents Eskimo
The Other People Place Lifestyles Of The Laptop CafePink Floyd The Piper at the Gates of Dawn
user ratings (333)
2.1
poor
other reviews of this album
1 of


Comments:Add a Comment 
AtavanHalen
June 17th 2011


17919 Comments


I was actually looking forward to this album, if only to give it a scathing review.


Stopped reading.

Seriously, people, this has gotten old quick. Move on and grow up.

YetAnotherBrick
June 17th 2011


6693 Comments


hey guise didja hear? the new Owl City album suckkkkss

Irving
Emeritus
June 17th 2011


7496 Comments


I was actually looking forward to this album, if only to give it a scathing review.

Stopped reading.[2]

Tyrael
June 17th 2011


21108 Comments


You just admitted being biased against this album while the whole point of reviewing is to maintain some sort of objectivity and an open mind while listening to the album. Also, Klap4music and Knott covered everything that's terrible about this album so we really don't need any more negative reviews.

ReturnToRock
June 17th 2011


4805 Comments


YOU WOULD NOT BELIEVE YOUR EYES
IF TEN MILLION FIREFLIES
LIT UP THE WORLD AS I FELL ASLEEP
'CAUSE THEY'D FILL THE OPEN AIR
AND LEAVE TEARDROPS EVERYWHERE
YOU'D THINK ME RUDE BUT I WOULD JUST STAND AND
STARE


Knott-
Emeritus
June 17th 2011


10260 Comments

Album Rating: 1.0

Yet perhaps the main thing that makes All Things seem so much better than Ocean Eyes is the fact that it is, indeed, the new Owl City album. A little-known fact about Owl City is that it is only one of several dozen projects in which Young is evolved, each one with its own name and clear-cut sound. If Young wanted to make anything drastically different or better than the four albums he has cut under this particular name (which happened to get the most attention), he would likely release it under a different moniker. Who knows, he may be releasing a masterpiece under another name as we speak. But Owl City is the project that sells hundreds of thousands of records, had a hit single, and is being followed by millions and millions. It is thus the one we will stick with for however long, and Young will likely continue to make records of the same abysmal quality as his previous ones. By his next album, just how atrocious this music is may not seem so shocking anymore. When will we get used to it? Probably never.




This paragraph is straight-up confusing, pseudo-articulate bullshit at its most irritating. What the fuck does this even mean? It's better, but it's worse? Fuck this shit.

Eko
June 17th 2011


2118 Comments


guys this isnt that bad but I may drop it down anywas. first listen was mildly pleasurable.



You have to be logged in to post a comment. Login | Create a Profile





STAFF & CONTRIBUTORS // CONTACT US

Bands: A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z


Site Copyright 2005-2023 Sputnikmusic.com
All Album Reviews Displayed With Permission of Authors | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy