How to Destroy Angels
How To Destroy Angels


1.5
very poor

Review

by Otaku USER (4 Reviews)
May 30th, 2011 | 20 replies


Release Date: 2010 | Tracklist

Review Summary: How to Destroy Angels you ask? I wish somebody would figured it out already.

Listen, here's the deal: Trent Reznor is one of those rare people who played a major role in re-defining the somewhat basic term "music". He changed it, he released stuff that 40 years ago would be considered as "traffic noises gone wrong" but he made it listenable, enjoyable and therapeutic at times. I have nothing but the utmost respect for the guy.

That said, every great artist has his ups and downs and then eventually he drowns (rhyme is not intended, it just reads that way). The key is to know when to stop. A good example is Kurt Cobain who realized that his one trick pony is starting to limp after the In Utero, so he really made sure that he doesn't start making the same albums over and over again. He did a damn good job preventing repetition and after In Utero we barely heard any new Nirvana songs.

Trent is not of the same caliber. He - at times - just doesn't know when to quit, but that is good at times (see KoRn) and sometimes not so good (see Radiohead).

"How to Destroy Angels" is a prime example of when to just call it quits. Wikipedia states that HTDA are post-industrial, experimental, electronica, which begs the question "what the hell is post-industrial" and "do we really need more post- tags for the same genres that have been around since forever?" but that is out of the scope of the Trent Reznor and Mariqueen Maandig (his wife, just in case you've been living in Afghanistan for the last few years) duo.

The self-titled album which goes by the name from the first release by the seminal industrial band Coil, feels forced. Feels unnecessary. Feels like they just got married and Trent said "hey, you know what'd be a good idea?" (after massive amount of sex, of course). In a way, one wonders: why make this record? Why not just let the marriage sink in, take some time off, I don't know, whatever. Don't rush it, because it feels rushed. Well, the only explanation I could find was, they needed money. Badly. Basically everyone who bought this poor album is kind of paying for Trent's wedding expenses. In a way, you know? Not like literally "here you go Mr. Trent Reznor, here's little something from me" but as in "I'll give money for this album" but then the money goes directly to the "wedding expenses" jar, that Trent probably put somewhere in the kitchen.

So what do they offer in exchange for your fortune?

"The Space in Between" is probably their single, since it's got an official video for it. The video is classic Trent: high heels lying on the floor which represent sex (yes, high heels are rarely associated with anything else than sex, however, more studies need to be done in this area to provide empirical data that would somehow confirm or reject this hypothesis). But as everything with Reznor, nothing is at is seems; indeed, there's blood on high heels. So it's like "yes, this is sex BUT with a twist". Nice twist if I might add.

His wife is bloodied and still somehow manages to sing. She seems pretty with the blood on her face, but it's probably just kind of image enhancer to modify her face, because sincerely she's not that pretty in real life. Back to the video: her singing and the actual voice are out of sync and I don't think I've watched a corrupted version of the video, since it's from their official youtube. Then, everything goes bananas. B-A-N-A-N-A-S. Some kind of violent fire breaks loose, burning everything, even her. But she still sings, which is kind of farfetched. I mean, when Th*ch Quảng Đức burned himself, I don't think he was singing. Still, it's just a video, I know, but silly things like that really bother me.
Oh, there are shots of two people that absolutely make no sense or connection to the video and Reznor is lying on the floor, bloodied and probably dead, but there's no proof for that. Still, the video manages to grab the attention away from the music, which is – in all fairness – pretty horrible. That said, the video probably makes sense, because Trent & Mariqueen Maandig combination brings out the most uninspired sound I've heard in a while: no wonder somebody wants to kill them. But I want to go on the record and say that I don't condone murder, I'm just saying that if someone DID decide to murder both Trent and Maandig because of what music they make together, I wouldn't be too surprised. Still, murder is never the only answer.

From the begging to the end, the entire album plays out like some unfinished NiN material, that should be on B side. All songs, and I do mean all songs sound unfinished, empty, monotonous. And when it manages to get a bit out there, it has NiN semen all over the place.

"A drowning" is indeed drowning the listener in uninspired singing, backed up by some mediocre rhythm section, and on top of that there's a classic "Fragile"-era NiN melody. No, I kid you not, listen to this song. Go on, do it. Youtube it. It will sound like classic NiN, except for the female vocals. It's almost as if Trent gave up on NiN, realized that he just lost his touch and wants to blame the bad songs now on his wife. And I think she realizes that, thus including her desperation in the lyrics:
"Please, anyone?
I don't think I can
Save myself...
I'm drowning here, please"

We are too. We are too.

"Fur Lined" IS a NiN song. Call me repetitive but "Fur Lined" sounds EXACTLY like "Discipline". Even her voice almost sounds like Trent's. It's sad to see that there's nothing innovative about How to destroy angels, but the album is really depressing when you think about it. I think she realizes the sadness in this album, too. Hence the chorus: "Is this really happening?".

I can imagine only a handful of people enjoying this, namely hardcore NiN and Mariqueen Maandig fans. But I'm not really sure about hardcore NiN fans, since even if you enjoy everything Trent ever made, you'll find this album hard to swallow. You will feel like somebody took your favorite NiN songs and raped them, brutally, violently, carelessly.

Actually it comes as no surprise that hipsters liked this album, because it offers you nothing (musically), thus by faking to enjoy this album makes you instantly against the majority who will dislike it, because it's really not good. And that's what hipsters need and feed on; artifacts, gadgets and music that majority just doesn't like for objective reasons.


user ratings (297)
3.4
great
other reviews of this album
red0 (3)
A promising, yet inconsistent release with more ups and downs than a rollercoaster....

669 (4)
How to Destroy Angels carries Trent Reznor's legacy sound with the addition of some great soothing v...

related reviews

An Omen

Welcome Oblivion
recommended by reviewer
Nine Inch Nails Discography


Comments:Add a Comment 
Mordecai.
May 30th 2011


8410 Comments


Kurt Cobain who realized that his one trick pony is starting to limp after the In Utero, so he really made sure that he doesn't start making the same albums over and over again. He did a damn good job preventing repetition and after In Utero we barely heard any new Nirvana songs.


I'm on the edge of my seat. What was Kurt's secret?

crazyblinddude
May 30th 2011


3388 Comments

Album Rating: 3.5

Err you kinda sound like an angry fanboy, in this review, tbqh.



And I don't think the critique on the music video they made was really necessary at all.

DoubtGin
May 30th 2011


6879 Comments

Album Rating: 3.0

another fantastic review from you

Otaku
May 30th 2011


60 Comments

Album Rating: 1.5

Do I sense a bit of sarcasm?

letsgofishing
May 30th 2011


1721 Comments


"Actually it comes as no surprise that hipsters liked this album, because it offers you nothing (musically), thus by faking
to enjoy this album makes you instantly against the majority who will dislike it"



Those goddamn bloodsucking hipsters

joplinpicasso
May 30th 2011


427 Comments


Go ahead, rip on Reznor all you want .... but by your logic, if he had 'quit' when he needed to, he wouldn't have won an Academy Award for an amazing film soundtrack (he wouldn't have created). The distaste being lobbed at his personal ambitions shouldn't be confused with distaste for his collaborations - the man wants to keep making music, and I commend him for it. Yes, I think this EP is quite mediocre, and I am a gigantic NIN fan. But it's at least a 2, Haha. And there's no mention of the third member of this band, Atticus Ross!

Also, the phrase "NiN semen all over the place" is quite discomforting LOL.

Tyrael
May 30th 2011


21108 Comments


How to Destroy Angels you ask? I wish somebody would figured it out already.

Grammar ftw

Lambda
May 30th 2011


2654 Comments


The review has grammatical issues all over it.... though I did laugh at a couple of spots..

Zettel
May 30th 2011


661 Comments


I had a good laugh. Have a pos.

SharkEthic
May 30th 2011


585 Comments


A few thoughts:

- Your review is generally unstructured.
- You spend a shit-ton of the review ranting about a video.
- You write conversationally and air-quote every other word.
- The few words that's not air-quoted is in parentheses.

I.e. your shit's borderline unreadable and you come off as a HUGE douch.

DonniSharK
May 30th 2011


466 Comments


"which begs the question "what the hell is post-industrial""

Post-industrial is an experimental subgenre of industrial that originated in the 80's. It was pioneered by Swans.



SeaAnemone
May 30th 2011


21427 Comments


"Trent is not of the same caliber. He - at times - just doesn't know when to quit, but that is good at times (see KoRn) and sometimes not so good (see Radiohead)"



had to read this three times to make sure I was understanding its illogic correctly and then subsequently laughed heartily.





heartily

Rev
May 30th 2011


9882 Comments


>Review by Otaku
>No Evangelion references

Fail

Rev
May 30th 2011


9882 Comments




DarkNoctus
May 30th 2011


12757 Comments


PINK FLUFFY BEAR!! :]

LoneWanderer
May 30th 2011


184 Comments


Otaku my man...I don't know crap about review writing but get yer grammar straight lad..

demigod!
May 30th 2011


49662 Comments


it's not a bad review... just not good

elephantREVOLUTION
May 30th 2011


3065 Comments

Album Rating: 3.0

lol, didn't know this was so highly regarded in the hipster community.

afghanwhigger
June 2nd 2011


71 Comments


I don't think your aesthetic opinion of Mariqueen Maandig's was relevant to the review of the album. Stick to THE MUSIC.

Minushuman24
November 11th 2012


5009 Comments


Words cannot describe my hate for this reveiw



You have to be logged in to post a comment. Login | Create a Profile





STAFF & CONTRIBUTORS // CONTACT US

Bands: A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z


Site Copyright 2005-2023 Sputnikmusic.com
All Album Reviews Displayed With Permission of Authors | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy