Dance Gavin Dance
Downtown Battle Mountain II


4.0
excellent

Review

by kevin234 USER (21 Reviews)
March 24th, 2011 | 18 replies


Release Date: 2011 | Tracklist

Review Summary: proving they are one of the best

Screamo, post hardcore, scene, whatever you call that angry music; most either love it or hate it. The genre is monotonous and unoriginal. Few bands really stand out because their albums lack creativity, talent, or progression. A few have created great music: Underoath, Thrice, and Thursday, but they are few and far between. Somehow in 2007 a little band from Sacramento released a real gem that became a mainstay in any scenester’s musical library. Dance Gavin Dance’s Downtown Battle Mountain is an undeniable classic. Now five years later, after countless line-up changes, scandals, rumors and drug abuse Dance Gavin Dance gathered that same legendary line-up and have released Downtown Battle Mountain II. And I’ll tell you, it’s just as good.

The album combines screaming, R&B, rap, progressive, and funk to make something very original, creative, and actually good! There is no filler intros or synth interludes here either. The band packed eleven songs with intense yet catchy guitar melodies, tight instrumentation, and thought provoking lyrics.

Lead guitarist Will Swan writes both guitars, an impressive feat by anyone, and displays much originality and undeniable talent. His guitar parts seamlessly play off each other and have plenty of funk and R&B vibes. The rhythm section is tight and noticeable. Where most bands have a bass that is nearly non-existent, the bass shines on this album. And the drumming is not just tons of double bass. There is technicality and life throughout.

Vocally the album features co-front man Jon Mess and Jonny Craig as well as Will Swan. Mess’s lyrics are thought provoking and interesting, taking a few listens to fully grasp. His screaming is actually diverse and easy on the ears. He doesn’t just sound like a guy throwing up into a toilet. To contrast with Mess’s harsh shoot is the Michael Jackson- like croons of Jonny Craig. His passionate soaring voice really helps this band separate it self from other acts. He is undeniably one of the better voices in music today. Even with all this, potentially the best part of the album is the rapping by guitarist Will Swan.

The album effectively puts an end to the whole past hardcore genre. No band is going to replicate what Dance Gavin Dance has been able to accomplish. In today’s music of auto tuned over programmed music, Dance Gavin Dance has managed to make something highly unique in a stale genre. Bands like The Devil Wears Prada and A Day To Remember are a dime a dozen with mediocre musical ability. And with this being the band’s fifth release it shows they have proven longevity and creativity to keep the musical genius flowing. It’s now time for this Sacramento band to get the respect it deserves.

Recommended tracks:

Spooks
The Robot With Human Hair pt. 2.5
Elder Goose
Heat Seeking Ghost of Sex



Recent reviews by this author
Chad Reynvaan Strange TwistClosure in Moscow Pink Lemonade
Secret Band Secret Band EP (Remastered)Strawberry Girls French Ghetto
Circa Survive Violent WavesBrand New The Devil and God Are Raging Inside Me
user ratings (1504)
3.6
great
other reviews of this album
1 of


Comments:Add a Comment 
kevin234
March 24th 2011


247 Comments

Album Rating: 3.0

wrote this for my school's newspaper, thought id just throw it on here b/c i haven't had a review in a while

twlight
March 24th 2011


10507 Comments

Album Rating: 4.5

good review. nice to see a 4 up

SHAKEandBAKE
March 24th 2011


1346 Comments

Album Rating: 3.5

"The rhythm section is tight and noticeably."



I think you either meant noticeable or forgot a word.



I agree with your rating, but I don't see how the best part of the album is Will's rapping, especially when he only showcases it two or three times.

twlight
March 24th 2011


10507 Comments

Album Rating: 4.5

^ agreed. that point was pretty dumb.

FromDaHood
March 24th 2011


9111 Comments

Album Rating: 2.5

This review has some good points but has minor grammar errors. Also, the band is called 'The Devil Wears Prada.' I do agree that the rap on Spooks is the best part of the album, but not with much else

whywontyoudie
March 25th 2011


3067 Comments

Album Rating: 3.0

there are so many things that i completely disagree with in your review, but your write up is pretty decent.



"And the drumming is not just tons of double bass. There is technicality and life throughout."



expand on this. how are they technical, if at all? what are some interesting parts that are attention grabbers?



"His passionate soaring voice really helps this band separate it self from other acts. He is undeniably one of the better voices in music today."



tbh, i think it's the exact opposite.





i pos'd it because the review itself isn't badly written, but it could definitely be beefed up.

FromDaHood
March 25th 2011


9111 Comments

Album Rating: 2.5

Actually the drum, in a lot of songs, IS just tons of double bass. I love Matt Mingus but he used to

use the double as a weapon

Crymsonblaze
March 25th 2011


8232 Comments


How much better is Jon Mess than before? Because he's the reason I hate DBM and their self-titled.

IAmKickass
March 25th 2011


840 Comments

Album Rating: 3.0 | Sound Off

Jon Mess kills it on this album, and while Craig has seemed to soften it up a little bit it still sounds really good.

drasticaction74
March 25th 2011


1947 Comments

Album Rating: 5.0 | Sound Off

they're mocking themselves. that's how good they are

DanceJosephDance
March 25th 2011


2 Comments

Album Rating: 5.0

I'm seriously considering reviewing this album and giving it a 5, seriously nothing can touch this but everyone on this site is so damn hard on it

MalleusMaleficarum
March 25th 2011


16396 Comments

Album Rating: 3.0

yeah dude, dont.

HRArchitect
March 25th 2011


2 Comments

Album Rating: 3.0 | Sound Off

This review contains terrible grammar and sentence structure. This is why no one reads high school "news" papers.

SHAKEandBAKE
March 25th 2011


1346 Comments

Album Rating: 3.5

"This review contains terrible grammar and sentence structure. This is why no one reads high school "news" papers."



This.



Sorry I had to neg.

kevin234
March 25th 2011


247 Comments

Album Rating: 3.0

@ hrarchitect

its a college newspaper. and 7 out of 8 people think this reviews good. plus an editor fixes all the mistakes for me before its pressed. so if you want to fix the mistakes for me thatd be great. thanks for being my bitch

kevin234
March 26th 2011


247 Comments

Album Rating: 3.0

@ malleusMaleficarum



who the heck are you to talk? you have no reviews and no ratings

MalleusMaleficarum
April 12th 2011


16396 Comments

Album Rating: 3.0

not on this account, no.



and it doesn't matter.

ShinXetsu
April 12th 2011


605 Comments

Album Rating: 3.5

Someone got a little fussy people had issues with their review. The little grammatical errors you have

don't do too much to hurt your review by themselves but there's enough here to really bring it down.

If your editor is actually worth his salt then you wouldn't have presented us with this.



You have to be logged in to post a comment. Login | Create a Profile





STAFF & CONTRIBUTORS // CONTACT US

Bands: A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z


Site Copyright 2005-2023 Sputnikmusic.com
All Album Reviews Displayed With Permission of Authors | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy