Interpol
Interpol


2.5
average

Review

by ciaranmc USER (9 Reviews)
September 12th, 2010 | 9 replies


Release Date: 2010 | Tracklist

Review Summary: Interpol suffer difficult-fourth-album-syndrome, to add to their second and third-album-syndrome.

It’s always suspicious when a band chooses to self-title any album other than their first. It could be a lack of imagination or effort. It could also be a statement of intent; after all, you risk tainting your band’s name and brand by linking it up so intrinsically with a single album of work, actively suggesting that the album is the sole defining work of your career.

My theory however, is that Interpol did it to showcase their horrible new logo seen adorning the cover of this LP: monochrome and angular like an anorexic orgy, and about as uncomfortable to look at too. It doesn’t suit a band typified by slickness, subtlety, and that ineffable NYC cool. Their old logo was fine, most likely a variant on the Futura font, and as we all know, since Wes Anderson made The Royal Tenenbaums, Futura is the only font any self-respecting hipster can be seen to be typing up an ironic politically-themed poem with.

Of course, all the aforementioned adjectives are principally meant to describe the band’s image more than their sound, as in fact it was the clash of subtlety and angularity that injected dense soundscapes with infectious grooves on Turn On The Bright Lights. Most of those songs were as fit for the indie dance floor as they were for shoe-gazing, and it was brilliant. Following up with Antics, Interpol focused on the groove that made the first album so danceable, and made only a decent attempt at harnessing it. Our Love To Admire then seemed to trigger a process that saw Interpol smooth off every rough edge on their sound to leave something nearly bereft of artistic merit, like sanding down Michelangelo’s David until it looks like a Top Shop mannequin.

Realising that they had crafted an album as flat as the desert, Interpol probably thought it necessary to have a spiky new logo - and explode it into shrapnel on the front cover to add contours that the album’s music lacks. If only the cover was in 3D; momentarily thinking that your album is exploding in front of your eyes before realising that you’re an idiot for thinking that is probably the most exhilarating moment this album would have to offer.

Few tracks stand out in the 45 minutes of whitewashed sound contained within, with Paul Banks’ perpetually morose baritone consistently making sure each track blends into the next without you noticing any discernable difference between them. ‘Barricade’ is perhaps the only track that could rank itself among Interpol’s best, a successful meld of their signature bass-driven groove and actually-memorable hooks. Banks’ voice even dares to rise above talking pitch to make the chorus genuinely exciting, lashing on generous helping of thick backing vocals and powered by a pedalling bass. I must say it hurts a little to criticise Banks’ voice, as it was once encapsulating, but here it sounds tired. It doesn’t help any further that Daniel Kessler’s guitars are still doing their best impression of The Edge, and recently-departed Carlos Dengler’s formerly penetrating bass lines now sound blunted.

It’s really no surprise that Dengler decided to leave when listening to an album that can do nothing else but retread old ground. He must have foreseen a hopeless future and this album doesn’t do much to dispel this prediction. However, right at the death with the album closer ‘The Undoing’, Interpol present one last gasp to prove they still have a promising future. I’m not sure why they left it so late to present this beautifully suffocating, bleak and menacing offering, as it runs the risk of never being heard, but it’s almost worth sticking out the entire album for. Weaving English and Spanish lyrics together, it’s probably the most inventive song on the album, and leaves a dark impression. It’s odd that the song is so depressingly hopeless, as it paradoxically fills me with hope that despite their diminishing returns, Interpol are not finished yet.

Written for www.nightbus.tumblr.com



Recent reviews by this author
Twin Shadow ForgetOwen Pallett A Swedish Love Story
of Montreal False PriestThe Tallest Man on Earth Sometimes The Blues Is Just A Passing Bird
Arcade Fire The SuburbsWeezer Hurley
user ratings (698)
2.9
good
other reviews of this album
1 of
  • Dan H. EMERITUS (3.5)
    Interpol fight Interpol by reverting back to Interpol....

    teoferrazzi (4)
    Interpol is the most cohesive album ever made by the band, an ambitious effort with the oc...

    Insurrection (4)
    An ambitious, and for the most part, successful experiment by Interpol....

    outline (3.5)
    Interpol take a divisive and flawed step in the right direction....

  • Electric City (2)
    Interpol is Interpol is Interpol. And Interpol sucks....



Comments:Add a Comment 
IanDavila
September 12th 2010


442 Comments

Album Rating: 3.0

mmmmm... and what about the music?

Photon
September 12th 2010


1308 Comments

Album Rating: 3.5

yeah the last song is really good ..i think this album is much better than the last one .Interpol are suffering from the classic first album syndrome

AliW1993
September 12th 2010


7511 Comments

Album Rating: 3.0

Excellent review. I still need to check this out as well as their earlier stuff.

PoodleRapist
September 13th 2010


269 Comments

Album Rating: 3.5

this is very well written, but... as far as the album goes, all you talk about is how you liked two songs, didn't like banks' voice, and that the cover is dumb. it would've been nice if you'd spent more time on the album than the band's history.

HighandDriving
September 14th 2010


3288 Comments

Album Rating: 4.0

Neg for my boy Banks.

HolyKatana
September 14th 2010


12 Comments

Album Rating: 3.5

I thought it was really good, but then I also like shoegaze, and this album is almost shoegazy in terms of texture. Is it as good as Turn on the Bright Lights? Of course not.

VheissuCrisis
Emeritus
September 15th 2010


1391 Comments

Album Rating: 3.0

Agreed with the delightful PoodleRapist. Not a bad review but not a good one either. Album's definitely a 3.5. Maybe 4 with time.

Photon
September 15th 2010


1308 Comments

Album Rating: 3.5

I'm surprised that no Staff member has reviewed this yet

teoferrazzi
September 16th 2010


31 Comments

Album Rating: 4.0 | Sound Off

so am I. but I also looked up past records I found to be important and saw that the same is true for, say, Gimme Fiction and Bows + Arrows. I'm new here, so I'm wondering: was Sputnikmusic a relatively unknown website back then?

as for the review, overall it is a bit rant-y, but then I read the great analogy you used to describe how bad Our Love To Admire was. So I decided to pos it. Against my own interest.



You have to be logged in to post a comment. Login | Create a Profile





STAFF & CONTRIBUTORS // CONTACT US

Bands: A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z


Site Copyright 2005-2023 Sputnikmusic.com
All Album Reviews Displayed With Permission of Authors | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy