Rooney
Eureka


1.5
very poor

Review

by Bitchfork USER (61 Reviews)
June 13th, 2010 | 38 replies


Release Date: 2010 | Tracklist

Review Summary: Eureka shows Rooney still "holdin' on."

As evidenced by their first two albums, Rooney are a pop band whose most memorable feature is how absolutely forgettable they are. If not mistaken for a number of other acts working their way to small amounts of radio stardom, they're solidifying their reputation as one of the most tedious pop artists in recent history. They're complacent with the fact that their music redefines the term "conformity," even if their utter lack of originality has left them without an identity, or, worse yet, without an appeal. While the rest of their discography was able to reach a large demographic, Eureka rehashes material which their target audience probably hasn't even heard of. If seen as an attempt to draw their fans to a new set of music, all I can say is that it's the thought that counts. Alas, the modern sheen and shallow laxity which Rooney associate with all aspects of their music allows another reason for this new influx of influences to arise. Simply stated, with the arrival of Eureka, Rooney have run out of ideas.

It's not hard to think of the vast array of styles that Rooney are using in their quest to redefine unassuming pop music. Tracks like "Stars and Stripes" take the trite "motivational" lyrics of their peers and meld them with the simple, jazz flair of Steely Dan. As well, the band contributes their fair share of unsubstantial eighties pop music, drowning in waves of simplistic and tedious pop rehash. But, though the band specializes in everything that's been done before, that's not Rooney's most palpable problem. With Eureka, the band has produced an album which is so boring it's become distracting. It's hard to wade through the overwhelming amount of forgettable verses and lackluster hooks in order to hit a short moment of promise. However, when this promise is found, it's nearly always a near-replication of their influences' styles. Seventies and eighties pop tributes are abound, with sneaky takes on jazzy piano rock and modern production ethics. This style of sound manipulation gives the album a glossy sheen, of course, but it only makes Rooney's flaws more evident.

Because of these elements, Rooney becomes shallow. As if their problems weren't glaring enough already, they go about their music with such a bored attitude that their sound can't do anything but reflect it. When not shining a proverbial light on their influences (the Nilsson comparison is obvious, but then again it sounds like a watered-down Locksley), they're seemingly plodding along on their instruments, coming up with expected and pitiful results. To add on to their list of overwhelming problems, any character that Rooney may have is suffocated by this gloss; it doesn't allow any sort of disparity to come through, leading to a pristine, but frustratingly unassuming sound. The guitars rarely stray from the simplest melodies, the bass and drums are minimal inclusions, and the vocals are lazy end thoughts rather than accomplishments. But don't think that Rooney don't know this; on the closer, "Don't Look at Me," they proclaim that they're a poor, old-news sort of artist. It's ironic, yes, but I doubt it's reflective; the chorus is arguably the most profoundly boring part of the album. Similarly, despite all of the chuckles you'll get out of Rooney's proclamation: "And it never stops; it's all I got./ And I never know when to turn./ Like a merry-go-round, it all comes around again,/...Yes, I'm holdin' on for as long as I can." it never seems like they mean it. They're simply misguided. When they try to relate to their fan base, they fail to form a connection (probably because such tracks like "Holding On" are so shallow and saccharine). When they try to craft perceptible pop hooks, they instead craft tawdry lulls. They're making the same mistakes that were made on their first two albums; now it's just more palpable. Unfortunately for Rooney (and the listeners of course), that is where any memorable feature of Eureka ends.



Recent reviews by this author
Mattin Proletarian of NoiseGuernica (Japan) Shinseiki e no Unga
Veliotis/Sugimoto/Kinoshita/Unami QuartetKesha Cannibal
Mathos Franz JosephSachiko M / Toshimaru Nakamura / Otomo Yoshihide Good Morning Good Night
user ratings (14)
3.4
great
other reviews of this album
Observer EMERITUS (2)
Eureka! Offensive radio pop...

related reviews

Rooney
recommended by reviewer
Locksley Be In Love


Comments:Add a Comment 
Bitchfork
June 14th 2010


7581 Comments


Any corrections? I know that my review is similar to Ponton's, but I find that he was too forgiving, unlike the unrelenting me.


No descriptive enough?
Grammar errors?
Corrections, etc?

Hit me up.

WatchItExplode
June 14th 2010


10450 Comments


isn't this that band that performed at the Peach Pit: After Dark?

Bitchfork
June 14th 2010


7581 Comments


I wouldn't know or care.

Bitchfork
June 14th 2010


7581 Comments


They did that When Did Your Heart Go Missing song if it helps.

ShadowRemains
June 14th 2010


27741 Comments


good review, pos'd

WatchItExplode
June 14th 2010


10450 Comments


idc either, that is the only interest I can feign in this band...review was enjoyable though

Bitchfork
June 14th 2010


7581 Comments


thank you.
don't bother checking this album out it's not all about the deaf metuhll

bloc
June 14th 2010


69990 Comments


When Did Your Heart Go Missing is pretty awesome, I remember it from Nancy Drew.

Bitchfork
June 14th 2010


7581 Comments


I hardly remember that song/review.

Slum
June 14th 2010


2580 Comments


Decent review

Bitchfork
June 14th 2010


7581 Comments


just decent?

ShadowRemains
June 14th 2010


27741 Comments


don't bother checking this album out it's not all about the deaf metuhll


heheheh



iBosley
June 14th 2010


268 Comments


not gonna check this out

Bitchfork
June 14th 2010


7581 Comments


I was going to post a reply which reversed the spelliong of heheheh, but alas heheheh backwards is still heheheh. palindromes are bitches

Bitchfork
June 14th 2010


7581 Comments


ya iBosley not worth anyones time evar

iBosley
June 14th 2010


268 Comments


i'll take your word for it

Bitchfork
June 14th 2010


7581 Comments


You always have.

iBosley
June 14th 2010


268 Comments


and look where its gotten me

mvdu
June 14th 2010


992 Comments

Album Rating: 3.5

I won't neg, because it's not badly written, but you spend too much time attacking the band instead of backing up why you don't like the album. Read's the opposite of a super fan's review. Album's not that bad, either. 3/3.5.

mvdu
June 14th 2010


992 Comments

Album Rating: 3.5

Meant "Reads" instead of "Read's"



You have to be logged in to post a comment. Login | Create a Profile





STAFF & CONTRIBUTORS // CONTACT US

Bands: A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z


Site Copyright 2005-2023 Sputnikmusic.com
All Album Reviews Displayed With Permission of Authors | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy