Band of Horses
Infinite Arms


3.0
good

Review

by killrobotmusic USER (5 Reviews)
May 19th, 2010 | 8 replies


Release Date: 2010 | Tracklist

Review Summary: Infinite Arms shows Band of Horses attempting to integrate their haunting soundscapes with a more folk-oriented approach. While the end result produces some undeniable strengths, the album as a whole ends up falling short of previous watermarks.

One word often used to describe Band of Horses is earnest. This can be derived mostly from their harmonious simplicity, whether it is singer Ben Bridewell’s unadorned yet powerfully delivered lyrics or the subtle interplay between richly melodic guitar textures (try to listen to “Window Blues” on a warm summer night and NOT think that everything is right in the world). After the young quintet surprised the Indie world with the highly acclaimed Everything All the Time (2006) and Cease to Begin (2007), it was only natural that a major label debut would follow. Infinite Arms shows Band of Horses attempting to integrate their haunting soundscapes with a more folk-oriented approach. While the end result produces some undeniable strengths, the album as a whole ends up falling short of the high watermark left by their previous attempts.

The main area that creates both the album’s strong and weak points is in the production. While Phil Elk returned as the producer for Infinite Arms, the overall sound is discernibly different from the band’s previous albums. This time around, Elk has used a multiplicity of sonic textures to create a more subtle and warmer sound. This is plainly evident from the opening track “Factory”, when a bright string arrangement accompanied by a plain acoustic guitar set the stage for a lush Americana-esque atmosphere. Similarly, the vocal layering has been taken to a whole new level. While past albums occasionally played with accompaniments for Bridewell’s soaring vocal melodies, Infinite Arms uses them as a primary constituent of the overall sound (I can only imagine how many vocal tracks were recorded to produce the striking harmonies in “Neighbor”). The end result adds considerably to the warm folksy sound that permeates each track, and adds new dimensions to Band of Horses’ overall aural palette.

For all the positives that these changes produce however, there are substantial drawbacks. The changes effected to Bridewell’s vocal melodies account for a large part of the problem. The rich emotive nature of his voice was part of what was so captivating about Band of Horses’s first two albums. Even such songs like “Monsters” and “Marry Song”, which otherwise could be described as instrumentally plodding, took on powerful new dimensions with the addition of Bridewell’s reverb-soaked crooning standing out prominently in the mix. Despite the rich textures obtained by the vocal layering described above, Bridewell’s main vocal presence has effectively been minimized. Even the soaring choruses of “Compliments” never seem to reach the raw power present in similarly energetic tracks like “The Great Salt Lake”. The higher octave range of Bridewell’s voice also is used much less this time around, which tends to add to a less emphatic presentation overall. The slower tracks do a good job of demonstrating the difference this can make, with “Evening Kitchen” and “Infinite Arms” coming across as downright boring while “For Annabelle” shines, in part due to a starkly vibrant vocal presentation which is more in line with their former sound.

The biggest problem with Infinite Arms is that is just doesn’t seem to have the emotional core of past releases. These aren’t bad songs by any means, but the overall presentation doesn’t always bring out their intended strengths. Hopefully, this just proves to be a transitory album between the indie and major label environments, and that Band of Horses can continue to develop their sound while using what made them so relevant in the first place to their advantage.


user ratings (350)
3.3
great
other reviews of this album
Rudy K. EMERITUS (3.5)
Nothing new to see here except a band making the most confident, assured work of their career....



Comments:Add a Comment 
Bitchfork
May 19th 2010


7581 Comments


This is a compilation of watered-down attempts at recreating what once was. Hell, EATT was a 4.5 in my book. Pos'

killrobotmusic
May 19th 2010


676 Comments

Album Rating: 3.0

Thanks man. I agree, it was much harder to take away from this album what I was took away from the first two.

Bitchfork
May 19th 2010


7581 Comments


uh huh

klap
Emeritus
May 19th 2010


12410 Comments

Album Rating: 3.5

i'll have a review up for this later, but i actually liked this better than the previous two (but not by much). band of horses have never really been my thing

killrobotmusic
May 19th 2010


676 Comments

Album Rating: 3.0

yeah, i can imagine that if the first two albums weren't your thing, this may rate a bit better. it actually has obtained some pretty

decent reviews so far from what i researched.

KebertXela
May 19th 2010


367 Comments


I think your summary is pretty spot on. There are some great tunes on this album, but as a whole it just doesn't have that perfect 'sound' that the others have.

Absolutely love the band though. I was really hoping for some more banjo on this one.

klap
Emeritus
May 20th 2010


12410 Comments

Album Rating: 3.5

i might have to listen to the debut again it didn't really grab me

Douglas
May 20th 2010


9303 Comments


the debut was fantastic, still havent really listened to this yet.



You have to be logged in to post a comment. Login | Create a Profile





STAFF & CONTRIBUTORS // CONTACT US

Bands: A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z


Site Copyright 2005-2023 Sputnikmusic.com
All Album Reviews Displayed With Permission of Authors | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy