Six Feet Under
Graveyard Classics III


1.5
very poor

Review

by Mags172 USER (2 Reviews)
January 28th, 2010 | 30 replies


Release Date: 2010 | Tracklist

Review Summary: A third cover album? Whats the point anymore...

Bands that release covers are either loved or hated by their fans. It isn't very often that a popular band releases entire albums solely based upon covers, let alone more than one. Six Feet Under defies that, and instead of choosing the route of writing their own material, they choose to do even more pointless covers.

I'm going to say this: There is really only one point in listening to this, and that is the curiosity some people might have in listening to death metal covers of ridiculous songs. Most of them have no place in the genre and shouldn't be converted into death metal form at all. They chose to cover some classic artists and songs in the past, such as Deep Purple's "Smoke On The Water," and Henrix's "Purple Haze." This time the songs are a little more metal and a little less classic rock, but still the same confusion as to why these songs. There is some Anvil, Prong, Van Halen, Slayer, and even Metallica. Very few of these covers are actually decent.

In my opinion, Chris Barnes went way downhill as a vocalist, and it definitely shows on this album. There's almost no aggression when growling even some of the heavier stuff. It just sounds like he isn't trying and that he is half asleep most of the time, such as on the song "Metal On Metal." Another thing is that it seems like they haven't really changed the instrument sound too much, which is probably for the better, considering that I don't want to hear a toned down version of Van Halen. It's kind of like karaoke with Chris Barnes, except this is actually being put on the shelves of stores.

One thing that isn't too bad is actually the sounds of the instruments themselves. Staying even the slightest true to the original sound can be a positive for this garbage. It's kind of like saying "This cover really sucks, but at least I can recognize the song they are covering." Only because of the riffs of the guitars and the drumming patterns can you identify what song it actually is. Based purely on the instrumental side, some of the songs are actually half-decent. Such as the Metallica cover "The Frayed Ends Of Sanity." and Slayer's "At Dawn They Sleep."

There really isn't too much to say about these set of covers, because it's kind of what you would expect. Death metal sing-along with Chris Barnes is fun at first, but it gets really tiring, really fast. There's really no point in listening to most of these covers; other than just to have a good laugh at how bad Six Feet Under completely butchers them.


user ratings (76)
1.5
very poor

Comments:Add a Comment 
KILL
January 29th 2010


81580 Comments


a dangerous meeting is funny lol cool review man

Ire
January 29th 2010


41944 Comments


5 it bro

KILL
January 29th 2010


81580 Comments


no one sees the comedy of these albums!

Mags172
January 29th 2010


127 Comments

Album Rating: 2.0

I saw the comedy in the first one but this isn't really funny. Its just bad.

BallsToTheWall
January 29th 2010


51216 Comments


I couldnt imagine how butchered A Dangerous Meeting sounds. I'm almost too scared to find it and listen to it. But I will.

KILL
January 29th 2010


81580 Comments


http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZV75ie3TWtc

i love the comments

XulOnerom
January 29th 2010


1818 Comments


At least they didn't butcher an entire AC/DC album this time around

Carnifex
January 29th 2010


1918 Comments


Album is an atrocity, if Barnes wasn't doing vocals I'd say this is around a 3. Listen to their Prong cover for some serious lols.

Mags172
January 29th 2010


127 Comments

Album Rating: 2.0

I really couldn't decide if I should have given this a 1 or a 2, either way it sucks.

Willie
Moderator
January 29th 2010


20212 Comments


Chris Barnes' vocals have always sucked, much like this band.

P.S. - Spellcheck is your friend.

Hawks
January 29th 2010


86772 Comments


I listened to A Dangerous Meeting and it was decent except for the vocals of course. Chris Barnes seriously sucks fat cocks and has pretty much his whole career.

Dryden
January 29th 2010


13585 Comments


That Mercyful Fate cover is so terrible.

Mags172
January 29th 2010


127 Comments

Album Rating: 2.0

Okay, I fixed a bunch of typos and improved a few sentences.

@Dryden the Metal On Metal cover is worse.



This probably deserves a 2 though because its mostly the vocals that ruin it.

Carnifex
January 29th 2010


1918 Comments


and the Ramones cover, oh god the ramones cover...

ov420
January 29th 2010


300 Comments


ya omg

ReturnToRock
January 29th 2010


4805 Comments


RIdicuLOUS.

TheSpirit
Emeritus
January 29th 2010


30304 Comments


fuck this band for ruining twisted sister

KILL
January 29th 2010


81580 Comments


he ruled in cc mother fuckers

Regulator
January 30th 2010


623 Comments


man i remember liking six feet under in like 1996 cos they were death without being too deathy lol.

i listened to warpath the other day and was bored shitless. even nostalgia couldn't keep me into it

Carnifex
January 30th 2010


1918 Comments


he ruled in cc mother fuckers

Because his vocals were so low in the mix.



You have to be logged in to post a comment. Login | Create a Profile





STAFF & CONTRIBUTORS // CONTACT US

Bands: A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z


Site Copyright 2005-2023 Sputnikmusic.com
All Album Reviews Displayed With Permission of Authors | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy