Lotte Kestner
China Mountain


4.0
excellent

Review

by Rationalist USER (50 Reviews)
January 5th, 2010 | 15 replies


Release Date: 2008 | Tracklist

Review Summary: A minimalist folk subtlety that hinges off of voice, rather than musical exploration, which allows Williams' voice to shine like the flawless gem that it is.

Throughout the years of female voices, some just stick with you. The reason why is sometimes obvious; such is the case for Marnie Stern, as her voice are like jabs of an aural knife. But there can also be the polar effect. Emily Haines, in my opinion, is a perfect example of this. I can't exactly point out why I think that she's a great vocalist, but I certainly do believe that she is a memorable one. Now, where does Anna-Lynne Williams fit into this spectrum? She lays on the former. Her voice is like a soft croon that soothes while it intrigues. It's perceptible and tender; it's contributions to the music make the composition she contributes to all the better and never fade away into the background. And she doesn't command the spotlight, the spotlight commands her. So, saying that, I was naturally ecstatic when I heard that she was moving away from the rock music chock full of shoegaze tendencies for a more minimalist folk sound.

Beginning with the somber, "Crush the Bird" the album takes flight, and immediately, the evolution that Williams has undergone is evident. While retaining the poignancy she had mastered on her last outfit, she includes elements of tenderness and refreshment. The combination of these musical achievements are subtle and sparse however, which is a reflection upon the sparse, subtle nature of the album. Most of this is most likely subsequent action provoked by the album's minimalism, as the album places Williams' voice as the music's utmost priority rather than the lone acoustic guitar. Even the acoustic guitar oftentimes escapes the aural mix entirely, making an even more diaphanous soundscape. And though the a'capella styles may seem like a plague to listen to, her soloist outings are a pleasant occurrence. This all leads to an album that oozes coherency and delicacy that is gorgeous, but lacks the exigency that her former work possessed so naturally. This may be the album's only flaw however, and some tracks like “Leif Erikson” hint at a lot of potential exigency. In fact, the middle of the album's duration melds in this urgency without compromising its former integrity before the album ends on as high of a note as it began.

In short, this is a great collection of eleven minimalist-folk compositions that secure Williams' place at the forefront of the genre itself. Not only does this album show that she can produce a solo album that cuts all ties from her former project, but that her musical exploits can be marked excellent, rather than a total tedium. While being overtly passionate, the album is a diaphanous symphony that utilizes both elements of this musical achievement. It allows the listener to reflect oft, and is a mellow work that is intense not because of a gruesome mix of spasmodic aggressiveness, but because of its lack of that. This quiet masterpiece allows subtlety to be exciting with its shifts in dark yet whimsical atmospheres, and therefore, the album is like riding a bicycle, you never forget what it entails.

FINAL RATING: 4.3/5-A minimalist folk subtlety that hinges off of voice, rather than musical exploration, which allows Williams' voice to shine like the flawless gem that it is.



Recent reviews by this author
The Radio Dept. Clinging to a SchemeThe Chariot Wars and Rumors of Wars
Alcest Souvenirs D'Un Autre MondeMetric Fantasies
Henryk Gorecki Symphony No. 3, Op. 36The Locust New Erections
user ratings (31)
3.8
excellent
other reviews of this album
rasputin (4)
minimalist folk from one of our favourite voices....



Comments:Add a Comment 
Crysis
Emeritus
January 6th 2010


17625 Comments


Aside from the intro about the poignancy of fruit I was impressed with this review.

Rationalist
January 6th 2010


880 Comments


I take it that you don't like metaphors and pseudo-intellect?

Rationalist
January 6th 2010


880 Comments


alright, who neg'd?

rasputin
January 6th 2010


14967 Comments


In short, this is a near-stagnant collection of eleven minimalist-folk compositions

Near-stagnant? That doesn't sound too nice.

Review is pretty good.

rasputin
January 6th 2010


14967 Comments


I really don't like your first paragraph - it tells me nothing and is just a waste of space. Sure, it may be well written, but the metaphor isn't that good for it to be worth having.

Another thing is that your use of advanced vocabulary is a little irritating - you come off like you're trying to sound smart.

that is quite beauteous, but lacks the exigency

I understand beauteous is a word, but I've never seen that used anywhere. Formality is good with reviews, but you need to find a balance so that the reader can feel comfortable reading. This is not to say you should dumb down your reviews, but just make them more accessible, and not look like you're trying to use odd/difficult words on purpose.

Rationalist
January 6th 2010


880 Comments


I'm surprised you picked out "beauteous" rather than "phantasmagorical"

This quiet masterpiece allows subtlety to be exciting with its shifts in phantasmagorical atmospheres, and therefore, the album is like riding a bicycle, you never forget what it entails.


But yeah, I think I'll remove some of the first paragraph.

thebhoy
January 6th 2010


4460 Comments


^ It's like reading Lacan, difficult for the sake of difficult.

You also use words somewhat improperly.

phantasmagorical atmosphere


that's an example, phantasmagorical doesn't really describe an atmosphere. More proper would've been like, I don't know, "the ______ atmosphere is created through phantasmagoria." Or something.

And using exigency two sentences in a row is ugly. I would switch to urgency or some other synonym in the second sentence. Basically like Rasputin said, you need to balance the difference between literary language (ie. beauteous, anything connotative) and non-literary language
(denotative). Otherwise it's well written and doesn't really deserve that neg.

Ulsufyring
January 6th 2010


1748 Comments


i see grammar issues here and there that still make me question whether your vocabulary is legitimate

and remember, a big fake vocab is like a really big car: overcompensating doesn't change reality

Rationalist
January 6th 2010


880 Comments


Fixed

Willie
Moderator
January 6th 2010


20212 Comments


I couldn't make it through that introduction, ha ha. Good album though.

jrowa001
January 6th 2010


8752 Comments

Album Rating: 3.5

good album but it can be a bit tiresome to sit through. i love Anna-Lynne Williams though

Willie
Moderator
January 6th 2010


20212 Comments


Yeah, I have to be in a specifc mood for this.

I have a reccomendation for you... the artist is called Dear Euphoria and the album is self-titled.

jrowa001
January 6th 2010


8752 Comments

Album Rating: 3.5

thanks Willie i am sure i will like it. i will probably let you know what i think on last.fm

jingledeath
January 6th 2010


7100 Comments

Album Rating: 4.0

great album

Rationalist
January 6th 2010


880 Comments


Fixed... again.



You have to be logged in to post a comment. Login | Create a Profile





STAFF & CONTRIBUTORS // CONTACT US

Bands: A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z


Site Copyright 2005-2023 Sputnikmusic.com
All Album Reviews Displayed With Permission of Authors | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy