Perhaps you could go more in depth?
|
| |
electro pop at it's finest
Dude needs to hear some Electric Light Orchestra
|
| |
obviously meant to be a joke/sarcastic review. if so, it's a good one.
otherwise, this dude is twelve.
|
| |
let him down gently.
|
| |
Or her, as the case may be
|
| |
all righty then...
how long have you been listening to music, dearie?
*flashes gallons*
|
| |
And I´m sorry, but your wording...it's like you're TRYING to sound sincere for the purpose of sarcasm. Like you're trying to sound like a gushing fangirl while being a jaded musical elitist.
Which is what most of us are.
|
| |
Also Asiatic who's the hottie in the avatar?
Zooey De-, I mean, Katy Perry.
|
| |
Also Asiatic who's the hottie in the avatar?
Katy Perry, of course
And I´m sorry, but your wording...it's like you're TRYING to sound sincere for the purpose of sarcasm. Like you're trying to sound like a gushing fangirl while being a jaded musical elitist.
"I thought that too, lou, untill he said Yard Trimmings. you gotta learn to listen!"
|
| |
I never thought William Control could lead to a boob discussion.
I guess he is good for something
|
| |
"Strangers" offer the best synth riff on any electronic album to date
With hyperboles like that you lose a lot of credibility. Nobody cares about giving you constructive critiscism because just about all of it is crap.
If anybody disagrees with me say so, but I think that sums up a lot of people's feelings.
|
| |
i wouldn't call it COMPLETE crap. it just seems like a well-written version of what a bad reviewer/12-year-old girl would write in her Live journal or Facebook entry.
constructive criticism: work on lenght, describe WHY you like this album, if possible find points that people may not like so much, even if you do like them. think outside the box - act like you weren't you, the wiL fan. think "what would someone who DOESN'T know who wiL is and/or who the artist playing is think of this record?"
THEN you write the review.
Also, take your time. listen to the album several times, and be thorough. i've had my opinion about an album's rating change abruptly the fifth or sixth time i listened to it. sometimes, say when i'm hesitating between a 3.5 and a 4.0, an extra listen may be the crucial tiebreaker.
and NEVER adopt the "automatic 5.0" mentality. this may be an automatic 5.0 for YOU, but if you tell it like that, nobody's going to believe you and you'll get comments like the ones above.
good luck on future endeavours, and welcome to the boys' club that is Sputnik!
- ReturnToRock, designated old fogey and newbie PR agent for sputnikmusic.com
|
| |
in short, don't just say "wiL roxxxx nd so does ths ablmu". it makes you look newbish and fangirlish. but assuming you're a fangirl is a first step.
also, don't take negs to heart. it's not worth it.
- RtR
|
| |
Album Rating: 1.0
the fact that this isnt a joke makes me laugh so hard.
|
| |
Album Rating: 1.0
because this isn't a classic in any genre.
this is one of those rare gems that is objectively bad
|
| |
Album Rating: 1.0
it's not an opinion. this is objectively bad.
|
| |
Album Rating: 1.0
hahaha chill chill i was just playing. sup i'm qwe. i'm not a retard. review needs lots of work but stick around and welcome
|
| |
qwe bites
he bites
|
| |
Album Rating: 1.0
but yeah you need to search around and find better music. i used to like creed, dw.
this place is a cornucopia of good and interesting music if you allow it to be
|
| |
just listen to obscure screamo records, that way you can be like "sup have you heard this band?" and people can be like "nope, oh man how do you do it"
|
| |
|
|
